204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20552093)
1. Reliability and validity of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale in prosthodontic patients.
Larsson P; John MT; Nilner K; List T
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 20552093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Psychometric properties of the Croatian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale and suggestions for modification.
Persic S; Milardovic S; Mehulic K; Celebic A
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(6):523-33. PubMed ID: 22146251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of an Orofacial Esthetic Scale in prosthodontic patients.
Larsson P; John MT; Nilner K; Bondemark L; List T
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 20552092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Methodological studies of orofacial aesthetics, orofacial function and oral health-related quality of life.
Larsson P
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (204):11-98. PubMed ID: 20623943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of the Chinese version of the Oro-facial Esthetic Scale.
Zhao Y; He SL
J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Sep; 40(9):670-7. PubMed ID: 23829233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and validation of the German version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale.
Reissmann DR; Benecke AW; Aarabi G; Sierwald I
Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jul; 19(6):1443-50. PubMed ID: 25467234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the psychometric characteristics of the Macedonian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire (OHIP-MAC49).
Kenig N; Nikolovska J
Oral Health Dent Manag; 2012 Mar; 11(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 22488030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and Validation of the French Version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale.
N'Guyen-Van TL; Moreau N; Braud A
Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(2):137-142. PubMed ID: 30856637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and convergent and discriminant validity of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP Child's version).
Broder HL; Wilson-Genderson M
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 35 Suppl 1():20-31. PubMed ID: 17615047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychometric properties of the Albanian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale: OES-ALB.
Bimbashi V; Čelebić A; Staka G; Hoxha F; Peršić S; Petričević N
BMC Oral Health; 2015 Aug; 15():97. PubMed ID: 26306391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and validation of the Italian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES-I).
Rella E; De Angelis P; Nardella T; D'Addona A; Manicone PF
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Mar; 27(3):1055-1062. PubMed ID: 36121495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development, validation and psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale: OES-Ar.
Alhajj MN; Amran AG; Halboub E; Al-Basmi AA; Al-Ghabri FA
J Prosthodont Res; 2017 Jul; 61(3):290-296. PubMed ID: 27888096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES-NL) in dental patients with and without self-reported tooth wear.
Wetselaar P; Koutris M; Visscher CM; Larsson P; John MT; Lobbezoo F
J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Nov; 42(11):803-9. PubMed ID: 26037598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability and validity of a Swedish version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-S).
Larsson P; List T; Lundström I; Marcusson A; Ohrbach R
Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Jun; 62(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 15370634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring patients' orofacial appearance: Validity and reliability of the English-language Orofacial Esthetic Scale.
Reissmann DR; John MT; Enstad CJ; Lenton PA; Sierwald I
J Am Dent Assoc; 2019 Apr; 150(4):278-286. PubMed ID: 30922458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. General well-being as an important co-factor of self-assessment of dental appearance.
Wolfart S; Quaas AC; Freitag S; Kropp P; Gerber WD; Kern M
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 17323722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.
Chiba R; Miyamoto Y; Kawakami N
Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Mar; 47(3):314-22. PubMed ID: 19679304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does the Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire measure dental appearance?
Mehl C; Kern M; Freitag-Wolf S; Wolfart M; Brunzel S; Wolfart S
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 19260435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A valid and reliable measure of constipation-related quality of life.
Wang JY; Hart SL; Lee J; Berian JR; McCrea GL; Varma MG
Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Aug; 52(8):1434-42. PubMed ID: 19617757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility of oral health-related quality of life assessment in prosthodontic patients using abbreviated Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaires.
Baba K; Inukai M; John MT
J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Mar; 35(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 18254801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
