205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2055252)
1. Dental and skeletal changes following sagittal split osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
Vasir NS; Thompson RT; Davies TM
Eur J Orthod; 1991 Apr; 13(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 2055252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgery-first approach in skeletal class III malocclusion treated with 2-jaw surgery: evaluation of surgical movement and postoperative orthodontic treatment.
Baek SH; Ahn HW; Kwon YH; Choi JY
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 21(2):332-8. PubMed ID: 20186090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical treatment of mandibular prognathism in collaboration with orthodontic treatment in Korea.
Park CG; Yoo JW; Park IC
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 1994; 18(4):407-12. PubMed ID: 7817892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stability after surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. I. Mandibular setback.
Proffit WR; Phillips C; Dann C; Turvey TA
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1991; 6(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 1940541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An American Board of Orthodontics case report. Correction of a Class III mandibular prognathism and asymmetry through orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.
Baker RW; Subtelny JD; Iranpour B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Mar; 99(3):191-201. PubMed ID: 1998295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal class III malocclusion on mandibular movement.
Nagamine T; Kobayashi T; Nakajima T; Hanada K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1993 Apr; 51(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 8450356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment of Class III malocclusion in a young adult patient: a case report.
Kiran BH; Kumar P; Ravi S; Shivalinga BM; Bhagyalaxmi ; Pradeep ; Kudagi V
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(3):35-41. PubMed ID: 23094557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Orthognathic surgical approach and partial glossectomy to a skeletal 3 adult open bite.
Petdachai S; Inoue Y; Inoue H; Sakuda M
J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1993 Dec; 33():14-20. PubMed ID: 8935077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of progressive cephalometric changes and postsurgical stability of skeletal Class III correction with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment.
Ko EW; Hsu SS; Hsieh HY; Wang YC; Huang CS; Chen YR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 69(5):1469-77. PubMed ID: 21256648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.
Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stability after vertical subcondylar ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
Tornes K; Wisth PJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1988 Aug; 17(4):242-8. PubMed ID: 3139795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stability of mandibular setback surgery with and without presurgical orthodontics.
Kim CS; Lee SC; Kyung HM; Park HS; Kwon TG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 72(4):779-87. PubMed ID: 24268965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A retrospective analysis of the stability and relapse of soft and hard tissue change after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback of 64 Taiwanese patients.
Chou JI; Fong HJ; Kuang SH; Gi LY; Hwang FY; Lai YC; Chang RC; Kao SY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 15742287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in condylar and joint disc positions after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
Fang B; Shen GF; Yang C; Wu Y; Feng YM; Mao LX; Xia YH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 38(7):726-30. PubMed ID: 19375280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relapse and stability after mandibular setback surgery one year postoperatively: a retrospective study.
Halvorsen ET; Beddari IY; Schilbred Eriksen E; Boe OE; Wisth PJ; Loes S; Moen K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 72(6):1181.e1-11. PubMed ID: 24831939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cephalometric evaluation of surgical-orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion.
Schatz JP; Tsimas P
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 9082005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the Stability After Mandibular Setback With Minimal Orthodontics of Class III Patients With Different Facial Types.
Lee YS; Kim YK; Yun PY; Larson BE; Lee NK
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 74(7):1464.e1-1464.e10. PubMed ID: 27060493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Skeletal changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
Lai SS; Tseng YC; Huang IY; Yang YH; Shen YS; Chen CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 17223511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stability of the mandible after sagittal ramus osteotomy for correction of prognathism.
Kobayashi T; Watanabe I; Ueda K; Nakajima T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1986 Sep; 44(9):693-7. PubMed ID: 3462361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
