229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20553792)
1. Speech versus non-speech as irrelevant sound: controlling acoustic variation.
Little JS; Martin FH; Thomson RH
Biol Psychol; 2010 Sep; 85(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 20553792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ERP correlates of the irrelevant sound effect.
Bell R; Dentale S; Buchner A; Mayr S
Psychophysiology; 2010 Nov; 47(6):1182-91. PubMed ID: 20456662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What characterizes changing-state speech in affecting short-term memory? An EEG study on the irrelevant sound effect.
Schlittmeier SJ; Weisz N; Bertrand O
Psychophysiology; 2011 Dec; 48(12):1669-80. PubMed ID: 22067074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Top-down modulation of auditory processing: effects of sound context, musical expertise and attentional focus.
Tervaniemi M; Kruck S; De Baene W; Schröger E; Alter K; Friederici AD
Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 30(8):1636-42. PubMed ID: 19821835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can the irrelevant speech effect turn into a stimulus suffix effect?
Schlittmeier SJ; Hellbrück J; Klatte M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 18421641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Serial recall of rhythms and verbal sequences: Impacts of concurrent tasks and irrelevant sound.
Hall D; Gathercole SE
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1580-92. PubMed ID: 21563018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of various articulatory features of speech on cortical event-related potentials and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
Korczak PA; Stapells DR
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):491-504. PubMed ID: 20453651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Deviance detection in congruent audiovisual speech: evidence for implicit integrated audiovisual memory representations.
Winkler I; Horváth J; Weisz J; Trejo LJ
Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):281-92. PubMed ID: 19733617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Disruption of immediate memory and brain processes: an auditory ERP protocol.
Campbell T; Winkler I; Kujala T
Brain Res Brain Res Protoc; 2005 Feb; 14(2):77-86. PubMed ID: 15721813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression: is it a suffix effect?
Hanley JR; Hayes A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):482-7. PubMed ID: 21928934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: Further evidence for changing-state disruption.
Campbell T; Beaman CP; Berry DC
Memory; 2002 May; 10(3):199-214. PubMed ID: 11958724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Listening to the sound of silence: disfluent silent pauses in speech have consequences for listeners.
MacGregor LJ; Corley M; Donaldson DI
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Dec; 48(14):3982-92. PubMed ID: 20950633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.
Marsh JE; Hughes RW; Jones DM
Cognition; 2009 Jan; 110(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 19081558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Familiarity affects the processing of task-irrelevant auditory deviance.
Jacobsen T; Schröger E; Winkler I; Horváth J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Nov; 17(11):1704-13. PubMed ID: 16269107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conceptual priming for environmental sounds and words: an ERP study.
Orgs G; Lange K; Dombrowski JH; Heil M
Brain Cogn; 2006 Dec; 62(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 16793186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Age-related differences in auditory evoked responses during rapid perceptual learning.
Alain C; Snyder JS
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Feb; 119(2):356-66. PubMed ID: 18083619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distraction in a continuous-stimulation detection task.
Horváth J; Winkler I
Biol Psychol; 2010 Mar; 83(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 20064580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The evocative power of sounds: conceptual priming between words and nonverbal sounds.
Schön D; Ystad S; Kronland-Martinet R; Besson M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 May; 22(5):1026-35. PubMed ID: 19583472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
