These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20554126)

  • 1. Bacterial diversity dynamics in rumen epithelium of wethers fed forage and mixed concentrate forage diets.
    Sadet-Bourgeteau S; Martin C; Morgavi DP
    Vet Microbiol; 2010 Nov; 146(1-2):98-104. PubMed ID: 20554126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of fermentation of diets of variable composition and microbial populations in the rumen of sheep and Rusitec fermenters. II. Protozoa population and diversity of bacterial communities.
    Martínez ME; Ranilla MJ; Tejido ML; Saro C; Carro MD
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Aug; 93(8):3699-712. PubMed ID: 20655439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microbial protein synthesis, ruminal digestion, microbial populations, and nitrogen balance in sheep fed diets varying in forage-to-concentrate ratio and type of forage.
    Ramos S; Tejido ML; Martínez ME; Ranilla MJ; Carro MD
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Sep; 87(9):2924-34. PubMed ID: 19465498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PCR-DGGE analysis reveals a distinct diversity in the bacterial population attached to the rumen epithelium.
    Sadet S; Martin C; Meunier B; Morgavi DP
    Animal; 2007 Aug; 1(7):939-44. PubMed ID: 22444795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phylogenetic diversity and dietary association of rumen Treponema revealed using group-specific 16S rRNA gene-based analysis.
    Bekele AZ; Koike S; Kobayashi Y
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2011 Mar; 316(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 21204927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postprandial changes of fiber-degrading microbes in the rumen of sheep fed diets varying in type of forage as monitored by real-time PCR and automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis.
    Saro C; Ranilla MJ; Carro MD
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4487-94. PubMed ID: 23100580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of detachment procedure and diet on recovery of solid-associated bacteria from sheep ruminal digesta and representativeness of bacterial isolates as assessed by automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis-polymerase chain reaction.
    Ramos S; Tejido ML; Ranilla MJ; Martínez ME; Saro C; Carro MD
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Nov; 92(11):5659-68. PubMed ID: 19841225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pyrosequencing reveals shifts in the bacterial epimural community relative to dietary concentrate amount in goats.
    Wetzels SU; Mann E; Metzler-Zebeli BU; Wagner M; Klevenhusen F; Zebeli Q; Schmitz-Esser S
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Aug; 98(8):5572-87. PubMed ID: 26051320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes to the rumen bacterial population of sheep with the addition of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene to their diet.
    Perumbakkam S; Mitchell EA; Craig AM
    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2011 Feb; 99(2):231-40. PubMed ID: 20607404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of forage:concentrate ratio and forage type on apparent digestibility, ruminal fermentation, and microbial growth in goats.
    Cantalapiedra-Hijar G; Yáñez-Ruiz DR; Martín-García AI; Molina-Alcaide E
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Feb; 87(2):622-31. PubMed ID: 18952730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic diversity and diet specificity of ruminal Prevotella revealed by 16S rRNA gene-based analysis.
    Bekele AZ; Koike S; Kobayashi Y
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2010 Apr; 305(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 20158525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of rumen acid load from feed and forage particle size on ruminal pH and dry matter intake in the lactating dairy cow.
    Rustomo B; AlZahal O; Odongo NE; Duffield TF; McBride BW
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Dec; 89(12):4758-68. PubMed ID: 17106107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA) and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) techniques for analysing the influence of diet on ruminal bacterial diversity.
    Saro C; Molina-Alcaide E; Abecia L; Ranilla MJ; Carro MD
    Arch Anim Nutr; 2018 Apr; 72(2):85-99. PubMed ID: 29381103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors influencing ruminal bacterial community diversity and composition and microbial fibrolytic enzyme abundance in lactating dairy cows with a focus on the role of active dry yeast.
    AlZahal O; Li F; Guan LL; Walker ND; McBride BW
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jun; 100(6):4377-4393. PubMed ID: 28390722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk of subacute ruminal acidosis in sheep with separate access to forage and concentrate.
    Commun L; Mialon MM; Martin C; Baumont R; Veissier I
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Oct; 87(10):3372-9. PubMed ID: 19574575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of a proteolytic feed enzyme on intake, digestion, ruminal fermentation, and milk production.
    Eun JS; Beauchemin KA
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Jun; 88(6):2140-53. PubMed ID: 15905444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of varying dietary forage particle size in two concentrate levels on chewing activity, ruminal mat characteristics, and passage in dairy cows.
    Zebeli Q; Tafaj M; Weber I; Dijkstra J; Steingass H; Drochner W
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Apr; 90(4):1929-42. PubMed ID: 17369233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterization of the rumen microbiome of Indian Kankrej cattle (Bos indicus) adapted to different forage diet.
    Patel V; Patel AK; Parmar NR; Patel AB; Reddy B; Joshi CG
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014 Dec; 98(23):9749-61. PubMed ID: 25359471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bacterial diversity associated with feeding dry forage at different dietary concentrations in the rumen contents of Mehshana buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) using 16S pyrotags.
    Pitta DW; Kumar S; Veiccharelli B; Parmar N; Reddy B; Joshi CG
    Anaerobe; 2014 Feb; 25():31-41. PubMed ID: 24315806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of procedures for detaching particle-associated microbes from forage and concentrate incubated in Rusitec fermenters: efficiency of recovery and representativeness of microbial isolates.
    Martínez ME; Ranilla MJ; Ramos S; Tejido ML; Saro C; Carro MD
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jun; 87(6):2064-72. PubMed ID: 19251933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.