These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20554387)

  • 1. Removal of glyphosate in neutralization liquor from the glycine-dimethylphosphit process by nanofiltration.
    Xie M; Liu Z; Xu Y
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Sep; 181(1-3):975-80. PubMed ID: 20554387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nanofiltration process of glyphosate simulated wastewater.
    Liu ZY; Xie M; Ni F; Xu YH
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(5):816-22. PubMed ID: 22339015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of BMED for glyphosate recovery from glyphosate neutralization liquor in view of zero discharge.
    Shen J; Huang J; Liu L; Ye W; Lin J; Van der Bruggen B
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Sep; 260():660-7. PubMed ID: 23832058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Drinking water obtaining by nanofiltration from waters contaminated with glyphosate formulations: process evaluation by means of toxicity tests and studies on operating parameters.
    Saitúa H; Giannini F; Padilla AP
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 Aug; 227-228():204-10. PubMed ID: 22664256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Partial desalination and concentration of glyphosate liquor by nanofiltration.
    Xie M; Xu Y
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 Feb; 186(1):960-4. PubMed ID: 21146921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Membrane technology applied to acid mine drainage from copper mining.
    Ambiado K; Bustos C; Schwarz A; Bórquez R
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 75(3-4):705-715. PubMed ID: 28192364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The negative rejection of H+ in NF of carbonate solution and its influences on membrane performance.
    Zhu A; Long F; Wang X; Zhu W; Ma J
    Chemosphere; 2007 Apr; 67(8):1558-65. PubMed ID: 17250866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Removal of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid from synthetic water by nanofiltration.
    Yuan J; Duan J; Saint CP; Mulcahy D
    Environ Technol; 2018 Jun; 39(11):1384-1392. PubMed ID: 28488926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of operating parameters on the arsenic removal by nanofiltration.
    Figoli A; Cassano A; Criscuoli A; Mozumder MS; Uddin MT; Islam MA; Drioli E
    Water Res; 2010 Jan; 44(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 19781734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of organic nutrient load on biomass accumulation, feed channel pressure drop increase and permeate flux decline in membrane systems.
    Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():227-42. PubMed ID: 25282091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
    Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterisation and application of a novel positively charged nanofiltration membrane for the treatment of textile industry wastewaters.
    Cheng S; Oatley DL; Williams PM; Wright CJ
    Water Res; 2012 Jan; 46(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 22078250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In-situ biofilm characterization in membrane systems using Optical Coherence Tomography: formation, structure, detachment and impact of flux change.
    Dreszer C; Wexler AD; Drusová S; Overdijk T; Zwijnenburg A; Flemming HC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():243-54. PubMed ID: 25282092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Arsenate removal using a combination treatment of precipitation and nanofiltration.
    Chang FF; Liu WJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(2):296-302. PubMed ID: 22233908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes.
    Yüksel S; Kabay N; Yüksel M
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 2():307-10. PubMed ID: 23731784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of ion concentration and natural organic matter on arsenic(V) removal by nanofiltration under different transmembrane pressures.
    Yu Y; Zhao C; Wang Y; Fan W; Luan Z
    J Environ Sci (China); 2013 Feb; 25(2):302-7. PubMed ID: 23596950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of feed water pH and membrane material on nanofiltration of perfluorohexanoic acid in aqueous solution.
    Zeng C; Tanaka S; Suzuki Y; Fujii S
    Chemosphere; 2017 Sep; 183():599-604. PubMed ID: 28575703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nitrate removal from groundwater using negatively charged nanofiltration membrane.
    Zou L; Zhang S; Liu J; Cao Y; Qian G; Li YY; Xu ZP
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Nov; 26(33):34197-34204. PubMed ID: 30515691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of operating parameters on spiramycin removal by nanofiltration membrane.
    Zhao C; Fan W; Wang T; Hou D; Luan Z
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(7):1512-9. PubMed ID: 24135099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of electrostatic interactions on the rejection with NF and assessment of the removal efficiency during NF/GAC treatment of pharmaceutically active compounds in surface water.
    Verliefde AR; Heijman SG; Cornelissen ER; Amy G; Van der Bruggen B; van Dijk JC
    Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(15):3227-40. PubMed ID: 17583761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.