860 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20555301)
1. Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Chun YS; Sinha I; Turko A; Yueh JH; Lipsitz S; Pribaz JJ; Lee BT
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 20555301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.
Garvey PB; Buchel EW; Pockaj BA; Casey WJ; Gray RJ; Hernández JL; Samson TD
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1711-9; discussion 1720-1. PubMed ID: 16651940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction.
Wan DC; Tseng CY; Anderson-Dam J; Dalio AL; Crisera CA; Festekjian JH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Aug; 126(2):367-374. PubMed ID: 20679822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Multicenter Comparison of Four Abdominally Based Autologous Reconstruction Methods.
Macadam SA; Zhong T; Weichman K; Papsdorf M; Lennox PA; Hazen A; Matros E; Disa J; Mehrara B; Pusic AL
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 137(3):758-771. PubMed ID: 26910656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes after Abdominally Based Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.
Erdmann-Sager J; Wilkins EG; Pusic AL; Qi J; Hamill JB; Kim HM; Guldbrandsen GE; Chun YS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Feb; 141(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 29019862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: part I. unilateral reconstruction.
Selber JC; Nelson J; Fosnot J; Goldstein J; Bergey M; Sonnad SS; Serletti JM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1142-1153. PubMed ID: 20885239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-analysis of flap perfusion and donor site complications for breast reconstruction using pedicled versus free TRAM and DIEP flaps.
Jeong W; Lee S; Kim J
Breast; 2018 Apr; 38():45-51. PubMed ID: 29227815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.
Chevray PM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. PubMed ID: 15457015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome.
Nahabedian MY; Momen B; Galdino G; Manson PN
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Aug; 110(2):466-75; discussion 476-7. PubMed ID: 12142662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Double pedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction.
Agarwal JP; Gottlieb LJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Apr; 58(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 17413875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of outcomes and donor-site morbidity in unilateral free TRAM versus DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Schaverien MV; Perks AG; McCulley SJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(11):1219-24. PubMed ID: 17720644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Lee KT; Mun GH
Ann Plast Surg; 2016 May; 76(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 25536199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of complications and patient satisfaction in pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction.
Momoh AO; Colakoglu S; Westvik TS; Curtis MS; Yueh JH; de Blacam C; Tobias AM; Lee BT
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Jul; 69(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 21659842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A cost-effectiveness analysis of DIEP vs free MS-TRAM flap for microsurgical breast reconstruction.
Tan MG; Isaranuwatchai W; DeLyzer T; Butler K; Hofer SOP; O'Neill AC; Zhong T
J Surg Oncol; 2019 Mar; 119(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 30562406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Is there a psychological and physiological difference between DIEP- and free TRAM-flap? A retrospective patient survey].
Wurzer P; Spendel S; Kamolz LP; Parvizi D; Tuca A; Rappl T
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2014 Aug; 46(4):256-62. PubMed ID: 25162244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is Unipedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Obsolete Owing to Superiority of DIEP Flap?
Leyngold MM
Ann Plast Surg; 2018 Jun; 80(6S Suppl 6):S418-S420. PubMed ID: 29369109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Muscle sparing-2 transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction: a comparison with deep inferior epigastric perforator flap.
Takeishi M; Fujimoto M; Ishida K; Makino Y
Microsurgery; 2008; 28(8):650-5. PubMed ID: 18844226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Myosonographic evaluation of rectus abdominis muscle function after DIEP flap breast reconstruction].
Kässmann C; Peek A; Luxenhofer F; Scheufler O; Exner K
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2002 Nov; 34(6):386-94. PubMed ID: 12601605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of donor-site morbidity of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction.
Wu LC; Bajaj A; Chang DW; Chevray PM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Sep; 122(3):702-709. PubMed ID: 18766032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) catheters inserted under direct vision in the donor site following free DIEP and MS-TRAM breast reconstruction: a prospective cohort study of 45 patients.
Zhong T; Wong KW; Cheng H; Ojha M; Srinivas C; McCluskey SA; Clarke H; Jacks L; Hofer SO
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Mar; 66(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 23142025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
