These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20555528)
41. Synthesis of spherical polymer and titania photonic crystallites. Klein SM; Manoharan VN; Pine DJ; Lange FF Langmuir; 2005 Jul; 21(15):6669-74. PubMed ID: 16008373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Orbital motion of optically trapped particles in Laguerre-Gaussian beams. Simpson SH; Hanna S J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Sep; 27(9):2061-71. PubMed ID: 20808417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Measurement of the Mueller matrix for ocean water. Voss KJ; Fry ES Appl Opt; 1984 Dec; 23(23):4427-39. PubMed ID: 18213331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Invariant quantities of a nondepolarizing Mueller matrix. Gil JJ; José IS J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2016 Jul; 33(7):1307-12. PubMed ID: 27409687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Poincaré sphere mapping by Mueller matrices. Ossikovski R; Gil JJ; San José I J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2013 Nov; 30(11):2291-305. PubMed ID: 24322928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Discrete-dipole-approximation-based light-scattering calculations for particles with a real refractive index smaller than unity. Laczik Z Appl Opt; 1996 Jul; 35(19):3736-45. PubMed ID: 21102771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Improved T-matrix computations for large, nonabsorbing and weakly absorbing nonspherical particles and comparison with geometrical-optics approximation. Wielaard DJ; Mishchenko MI; Macke A; Carlson BE Appl Opt; 1997 Jun; 36(18):4305-13. PubMed ID: 18253460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Approximate methods for modeling the scattering properties of nonspherical particles: evaluation of the Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin method. Klett JD; Sutherland RA Appl Opt; 1992 Jan; 31(3):373-86. PubMed ID: 20717415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Analytic inversion of the Mueller-Jones polarization matrices for homogeneous media. Arteaga O; Canillas A Opt Lett; 2010 Feb; 35(4):559-61. PubMed ID: 20160817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Mueller matrix calculations for dielectric cubes: comparison with experiments. Kattawar GW; Hu CR; Parkin ME; Herb P Appl Opt; 1987 Oct; 26(19):4174-80. PubMed ID: 20490205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Laboratory studies of angle- and polarization-dependent light scattering in sea ice. Miller D; Quinby-Hunt MS; Hunt AJ Appl Opt; 1997 Feb; 36(6):1278-88. PubMed ID: 18250801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Morphological and light-absorption characteristics of individual BC particles collected in an urban seaside area at Tokaimura, eastern central Japan. Fu FF; Watanabe K; Shinohara N; Xu X; Xu L; Akagi T Sci Total Environ; 2008 Apr; 393(2-3):273-82. PubMed ID: 18262223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Explicit algebraic characterization of Mueller matrices. Gil JJ; San José I Opt Lett; 2014 Jul; 39(13):4041-4. PubMed ID: 24978802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Size determination by use of two-dimensional Mueller matrices backscattered by optically thick random media. Dillet J; Baravian C; Caton F; Parker A Appl Opt; 2006 Jul; 45(19):4669-78. PubMed ID: 16799681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A complete characterization of pre-Mueller and Mueller matrices in polarization optics. Simon BN; Simon S; Mukunda N; Gori F; Santarsiero M; Borghi R; Simon R J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Feb; 27(2):188-99. PubMed ID: 20126230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Sizing homogeneous spherical particles from intensity-only angular scatter. Li W; Jaffe JS J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Feb; 27(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 20126224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]