These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20556246)

  • 21. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
    Petrie CS; Williams JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 16117775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Lingual concavities in the mandible: a morphological study using cross-sectional analysis determined by CBCT.
    Nickenig HJ; Wichmann M; Eitner S; Zöller JE; Kreppel M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 25547216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stress analysis in edentulous mandibular bone supporting implant-retained 1-piece or multiple superstructures.
    Yokoyama S; Wakabayashi N; Shiota M; Ohyama T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(4):578-83. PubMed ID: 16161742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Finite element simulation of the human mandible: the role of (natural) teeth.
    Kober C; Stübinger S; Hellmich C; Sader R; Zeilhofer HF
    Int J Comput Dent; 2008; 11(3-4):169-74. PubMed ID: 19216309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
    Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Treatment planning of implants when 3 mandibular posterior teeth are missing: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Chen XY; Zhang CY; Nie EM; Zhang MC
    Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):340-3. PubMed ID: 22814561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Risk of lingual plate perforation during implant placement in the posterior mandible: a human cadaver study.
    Leong DJ; Chan HL; Yeh CY; Takarakis N; Fu JH; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 21811168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bone density at implant sites and its relationship to assessment of bone quality and treatment outcome.
    Bergkvist G; Koh KJ; Sahlholm S; Klintström E; Lindh C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):321-8. PubMed ID: 20369091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants.
    Lai H; Zhang F; Zhang B; Yang C; Xue M
    Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 1(3):7-11. PubMed ID: 10557165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Naini RB; Nokar S; Borghei H; Alikhasi M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):776-81. PubMed ID: 21841987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biomechanical effect of crestal bone osteoplasty before implant placement: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Hudieb M; Kasugai S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 21131179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of tapered and external hexagon connections on bone stresses around tilted dental implants: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical analysis.
    de Faria Almeida DA; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Santiago JF; de Carvalho PS
    J Periodontol; 2014 Feb; 85(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 23688104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Radiomorphometric indices and their relation to alveolar bone loss in completely edentulous Turkish patients: a retrospective study.
    Yüzügüllü B; Gulsahi A; Imirzalioglu P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 19231567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Simşek B; Erkmen E; Yilmaz D; Eser A
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 15979921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the influence of location of osseointegrated implants associated with mandibular removable partial dentures.
    Cunha LD; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Pereira JA
    Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):278-87. PubMed ID: 18784528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bicortically stabilized implant load transfer.
    Jeong CM; Caputo AA; Wylie RS; Son SC; Jeon YC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 12608670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Finite element stress analysis of edentulous mandibles with different bone types supporting multiple-implant superstructures.
    de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Freitas MM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1108-14. PubMed ID: 21197486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of molar support loss on stress and strain in premolar periodontium: a patient-specific FEM study.
    Kondo T; Wakabayashi N
    J Dent; 2009 Jul; 37(7):541-8. PubMed ID: 19380187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Morphology and dimensions of the mandibular jaw bone in the interforaminal region in patients requiring implants in the distal areas.
    Quirynen M; Mraiwa N; van Steenberghe D; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Jun; 14(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 12755778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of microthread design of dental implants on stress and strain patterns: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Amid R; Raoofi S; Kadkhodazadeh M; Movahhedi MR; Khademi M
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2013 Oct; 58(5):457-67. PubMed ID: 24021588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.