135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20556373)
1. Combining gastric and ileal segments, does it overcome segment-related complications? An experimental study on rats.
Burgu B; Gökce Mİ; Aydoğdu Ö; Süer E; Kankaya D; Soygür T
Urol Res; 2011 Feb; 39(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 20556373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The development of tumors in experimental gastroenterocystoplasty.
Buson H; Diaz DC; Manivel JC; Jessurun J; Dayanc M; Gonzalez R
J Urol; 1993 Aug; 150(2 Pt 2):730-3. PubMed ID: 8326635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reversed seromuscular gastrocystoplasty for bladder augmentation.
Abasiyanik A; Daşci Z; Duman A; Kuru N; Köseoğlu B; Gündoğlu B; Abasiyanik F; Beşoluk K
Res Exp Med (Berl); 1999 Jul; 199(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 10494672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Seromuscular gastrocystoplasty in rats.
Demirbilek S; Atayurt HF; Han U; Aydin G
J Pediatr Surg; 1997 Apr; 32(4):575-9. PubMed ID: 9126757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term histopathological changes observed in rats subjected to augmentation cystoplasty.
Little JS; Klee LW; Hoover DM; Rink RC
J Urol; 1994 Aug; 152(2 Pt 2):720-4. PubMed ID: 8022004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relative microbial resistance of gastric, ileal and cecal bladder augmentation in the rat.
Lewis AG; Gardner B; Gilbert A; Jarvis PD; Wacksman J; Bove KE; Sheldon CA
J Urol; 1995 Nov; 154(5):1895-9. PubMed ID: 7563379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histological changes following two-step flap gastrocystoplasty in rats.
Campodonico F; Michelazzi A; Medica M; Favre A; Giglio M; Merlo F; Buffa P; Carmignani G
Urol Int; 2002; 68(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 11803268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Urinary pH and urea concentration correlate to the bacterial colonization rate in gastric, colonic, ileal and myoperitoneal bladder augmentation.
Lauvetz RW; Monda JM; Kramer SA; Husmann DA
J Urol; 1995 Aug; 154(2 Pt 2):899-902. PubMed ID: 7609208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early metabolic, functional and histological changes in a rat ileal-augmented bladder model.
Arena S; Fazzari C; Minutoli L; Borruto FA; Russo T; Arena F
Pediatr Med Chir; 2011; 33(5-6):241-6. PubMed ID: 22428433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of urinary diversion on experimental gastrocystoplasty.
Castro-Diaz D; Froemming C; Manivel JC; Long R; Buson H; Reinberg Y; Gonzalez R
J Urol; 1992 Aug; 148(2 Pt 2):571-4. PubMed ID: 1640524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [[Experimental microsurgical gastrocystoplasty] ].
Campodonico F; Michelazzi A; Medica M; Simonato A; Ognio E; Sanguineti M; Giglio M; Germinale F; Carmignani G
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2000 Jun; 52(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 11085066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Augmentation cystoplasty in rats: development of an animal model.
Guan ZC; Ricard G; Charest-Boulé L; Neilson K; Kiruluta G
J Urol; 1990 Aug; 144(2 Pt 2):461-5; discussion 474. PubMed ID: 2374221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term histological and mucin alterations in the neobladder mucosa following urinary bladder augmentation or substitution with gastrointestinal segment.
Kispal ZF; Kardos D; Jilling T; Kereskai L; Isaacs M; Balogh DL; Pinter AB; Till H; Vajda P
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Dec; 11(6):349.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26298391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New concepts of histological changes in experimental augmentation cystoplasty: insights into the development of neoplastic transformation at the enterovesical and gastrovesical anastomosis.
Gitlin JS; Wu XR; Sun TT; Ritchey ML; Shapiro E
J Urol; 1999 Sep; 162(3 Pt 2):1096-100. PubMed ID: 10458439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mucosectomy impairs ileal microcirculation and results in flap contraction after experimental ileocystoplasty.
Cervellione RM; Hajnal D; Varga G; Rakoczy G; Kaszaki J; Keene D; Goyal A; Dickson A; Cserni T
J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Feb; 13(1):81.e1-81.e5. PubMed ID: 28040322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ileocystoplasty in rats: metabolic, renal and enteropatch changes in a mid- and long-term follow-up.
Arena S; Arena F; Fazzari C; Minutoli L; Russo T; Altavilla D; Squadrito F; Nicòtina PA; Romeo C; Magno C
Urol Int; 2011; 87(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 21677419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Yang-Monti ileal ureter-bladder anastomosis versus Yang-Monti ileal ureter-ureteral anastomosis for the treatment of ureteral stenosis: a randomized controlled trial in a miniature pig model.
Zhenxing W; Zhaolin S; Xiushu Y; Guangheng L; Ye T; Lei S; Zhiyong S; Hongming L
BMC Urol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):129. PubMed ID: 31822266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flow cytometry analysis of proliferative lesions at the gastrocystoplasty anastomosis.
Close CE; Tekgul S; Ganesan GS; True LD; Mitchell ME
J Urol; 2003 Jan; 169(1):365-8. PubMed ID: 12478191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histologic findings after gastrocystoplasty in rabbits.
Vajda P; Pinter AB; Magyarlaki T; Vastyan AM; Juhasz Z; Oberritter Z; Fathi K
J Pediatr Surg; 2005 Sep; 40(9):1470-4. PubMed ID: 16150351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bacterial adherence in a rat bladder augmentation model: ileocystoplasty versus colocystoplasty.
Sakai Y; Fujisawa M; Nakano Y; Miyazaki S; Arakawa S; Kamidono S
J Urol; 2000 Dec; 164(6):2104-7. PubMed ID: 11061936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
