These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20556640)

  • 21. Linear inverse source estimate of combined EEG and MEG data related to voluntary movements.
    Babiloni F; Carducci F; Cincotti F; Del Gratta C; Pizzella V; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Tecchio F; Babiloni C
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2001 Dec; 14(4):197-209. PubMed ID: 11668651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A methodological framework for inverse-modeling of propagating cortical activity using MEG/EEG.
    Hindriks R
    Neuroimage; 2020 Dec; 223():117345. PubMed ID: 32896634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Feature-Less Automatic Classification of Independent Components in Multi-Channel Electrophysiological Brain Recordings.
    Croce P; Zappasodi F; Marzetti L; Merla A; Pizzella V; Chiarelli AM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2019 Aug; 66(8):2372-2380. PubMed ID: 30582523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Divergent cortical generators of MEG and EEG during human sleep spindles suggested by distributed source modeling.
    Dehghani N; Cash SS; Chen CC; Hagler DJ; Huang M; Dale AM; Halgren E
    PLoS One; 2010 Jul; 5(7):e11454. PubMed ID: 20628643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the effect of volume conduction on EEG coherence with the effect of field spread on MEG coherence.
    Winter WR; Nunez PL; Ding J; Srinivasan R
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(21):3946-57. PubMed ID: 17607723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Combined EEG and MEG analysis of early somatosensory evoked activity in children and adolescents with focal epilepsies.
    Bast T; Wright T; Boor R; Harting I; Feneberg R; Rupp A; Hoechstetter K; Rating D; Baumgärtner U
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1721-35. PubMed ID: 17572142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization.
    Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 86(5):303-21. PubMed ID: 7685264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Beamformer source analysis and connectivity on concurrent EEG and MEG data during voluntary movements.
    Muthuraman M; Hellriegel H; Hoogenboom N; Anwar AR; Mideksa KG; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91441. PubMed ID: 24618596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bispectral pairwise interacting source analysis for identifying systems of cross-frequency interacting brain sources from electroencephalographic or magnetoencephalographic signals.
    Chella F; Pizzella V; Zappasodi F; Nolte G; Marzetti L
    Phys Rev E; 2016 May; 93(5):052420. PubMed ID: 27300936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Emergence of synchronous EEG spindles from asynchronous MEG spindles.
    Dehghani N; Cash SS; Halgren E
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2011 Dec; 32(12):2217-27. PubMed ID: 21337472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain.
    Cohen D; Cuffin BN; Yunokuchi K; Maniewski R; Purcell C; Cosgrove GR; Ives J; Kennedy JG; Schomer DL
    Ann Neurol; 1990 Dec; 28(6):811-7. PubMed ID: 2285267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Differences in MEG/EEG epileptic spike yields explained by regional differences in signal-to-noise ratios.
    de Jongh A; de Munck JC; Gonçalves SI; Ossenblok P
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Apr; 22(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 15805816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Magnetoencephalographic and electroencephalographic evaluation in patients with cryptogenetic partial epilepsy.
    Verrotti A; Pizzella V; Madonna L; Franciotti R; Trotta D; Morgese G; Chiarelli F; Romani GL
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2003 Sep; 33(4):174-9. PubMed ID: 14519545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mapping the signal-to-noise-ratios of cortical sources in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
    Goldenholz DM; Ahlfors SP; Hämäläinen MS; Sharon D; Ishitobi M; Vaina LM; Stufflebeam SM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Apr; 30(4):1077-86. PubMed ID: 18465745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparing MEG and EEG in detecting the ~20-Hz rhythm modulation to tactile and proprioceptive stimulation.
    Illman M; Laaksonen K; Liljeström M; Jousmäki V; Piitulainen H; Forss N
    Neuroimage; 2020 Jul; 215():116804. PubMed ID: 32276061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modality-specific spike identification in simultaneous magnetoencephalography/electroencephalography: a methodological approach.
    Zijlmans M; Huiskamp GM; Leijten FS; Van Der Meij WM; Wieneke G; Van Huffelen AC
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Jun; 19(3):183-91. PubMed ID: 12226563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Simultaneous EEG/MEG yields complementary information of nociceptive evoked responses.
    Ahmed Mahmutoglu M; Rupp A; Baumgärtner U
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2022 Nov; 143():21-35. PubMed ID: 36087398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Demonstration of useful differences between magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram.
    Cohen D; Cuffin BN
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1983 Jul; 56(1):38-51. PubMed ID: 6190632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.