These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Peer review of research project grants by NIH study sections: report of the Committee on National Medical Policy, American Society for Clinical Investigation. Bondurant S Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 10304718 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Letter: The National Institutes of Health grants peer review study team. Looney GL Am J Chin Med (Gard City N Y); 1976; 4(2):201-3. PubMed ID: 937242 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The changing face of peer review at the National Institutes of Health. Leppert PC Fertil Steril; 2004 Feb; 81(2):279-86. PubMed ID: 14967360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Editorial: The Peer Review System and NIH. Bucy PC Surg Neurol; 1976 May; 5(5):319-20. PubMed ID: 1265652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. National Institutes of Health: the lottery. Heilman KM Ann Neurol; 2007 Jul; 62(1):106. PubMed ID: 17474112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Government support for lung research. Brigham KL Am Rev Respir Dis; 1990 Aug; 142(2):271-3. PubMed ID: 2382888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. NIH peer review system: facts and figures on study sections add up to trouble. Fed Proc; 1978 Aug; 37(10):1a-4a. PubMed ID: 581073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Nurturing the biomedical research enterprise. Wyngaarden JB P R Health Sci J; 1986 Aug; 5(2):43-50. PubMed ID: 3823360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Letter: Peer review system utilized by the NIH and the NSF. Fed Proc; 1973 Dec; 32(12):2142-3. PubMed ID: 4753768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reviewing Peer Review at the NIH. Lauer MS; Nakamura R N Engl J Med; 2015 Nov; 373(20):1893-5. PubMed ID: 26559568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proposals for improving the Peer Review System of the National Institutes of Health. Kirschstein RL Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 10304717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Visceral viewpoints. Goals and controls - grants and contracts. Spiro HM N Engl J Med; 1975 Sep; 293(11):545-7. PubMed ID: 1152879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Peer review of researchgrant applications at the National Institutes of Health 2: review by an initial review group. Henley C Fed Proc; 1977 Aug; 36(9):2186-90. PubMed ID: 885260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Growing pains for NIH grant review. Bonetta L Cell; 2006 Jun; 125(5):823-5. PubMed ID: 16751088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. NIH peer review of grant applications. Definitions, procedures, and suggestions. Wingate CL Invest Radiol; 1993 Apr; 28 Suppl 2():S38-40. PubMed ID: 8478186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Washington report: a conversation with Vincent T. DeVita, Jr., M.D.. Interview by Daniel S. Greenberg. DeVita VT N Engl J Med; 1980 Oct; 303(17):1014-6. PubMed ID: 7412849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]