153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2055736)
1. Comparison of the rates of adverse drug reactions. Ionic contrast agents, ionic agents combined with steroids, and nonionic agents.
Wolf GL; Mishkin MM; Roux SG; Halpern EF; Gottlieb J; Zimmerman J; Gillen J; Thellman C
Invest Radiol; 1991 May; 26(5):404-10. PubMed ID: 2055736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nephrotoxicity of ionic and nonionic contrast media in 1196 patients: a randomized trial. The Iohexol Cooperative Study.
Rudnick MR; Goldfarb S; Wexler L; Ludbrook PA; Murphy MJ; Halpern EF; Hill JA; Winniford M; Cohen MB; VanFossen DB
Kidney Int; 1995 Jan; 47(1):254-61. PubMed ID: 7731155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multicenter trial of ionic versus nonionic contrast media for cardiac angiography. The Iohexol Cooperative Study.
Hill JA; Winniford M; Cohen MB; Van Fossen DB; Murphy MJ; Halpern EF; Ludbrook PA; Wexler L; Rudnick MR; Goldfarb S
Am J Cardiol; 1993 Oct; 72(11):770-5. PubMed ID: 8213508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of iohexol 300 and diatrizoate meglumine 60 for body CT: image quality, adverse reactions, and aborted/repeated examinations.
Bernardino ME; Fishman EK; Jeffrey RB; Brown PC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):665-7. PubMed ID: 1739017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The comparative effects of ionic versus nonionic agents in cardiac catheterization.
Benotti JR
Invest Radiol; 1988 Nov; 23 Suppl 2():S366-73. PubMed ID: 3058641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of iohexol in patients with previous reactions to ionic contrast material. A multicenter clinical trial.
Siegle RL; Halvorsen RA; Dillon J; Gavant ML; Halpern E
Invest Radiol; 1991 May; 26(5):411-6. PubMed ID: 2055737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pretreatment with corticosteroids to prevent adverse reactions to nonionic contrast media.
Lasser EC; Berry CC; Mishkin MM; Williamson B; Zheutlin N; Silverman JM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):523-6. PubMed ID: 8109489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective trial of ionic vs nonionic contrast agents in routine clinical practice: comparison of adverse effects.
Wolf GL; Arenson RL; Cross AP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 May; 152(5):939-44. PubMed ID: 2495706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of patient reactions and diagnostic quality for hysterosalpingography using ionic and nonionic contrast media.
Chen MY; Zagoria RJ; Fayez JA; Ott DJ; Van Swearingen FL
Acad Radiol; 1995 Feb; 2(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 9419535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Advantages of nonionic contrast agents in adult urography.
Dray RJ; Winfield AC; Muhletaler CA; Kirchner FK
Urology; 1984 Sep; 24(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 6382739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Iohexol for excretory urography: a comparative study.
Winfield AC; Dray RJ; Kirchner FK; Muhletaler CA; Price RR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Sep; 141(3):571-3. PubMed ID: 6349311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast bolus dynamic computed tomography for the measurement of solid organ perfusion.
Blomley MJ; Coulden R; Bufkin C; Lipton MJ; Dawson P
Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S72-7; discussion S78. PubMed ID: 8282508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pretreatment with corticosteroids to alleviate reactions to intravenous contrast material.
Lasser EC; Berry CC; Talner LB; Santini LC; Lang EK; Gerber FH; Stolberg HO
N Engl J Med; 1987 Oct; 317(14):845-9. PubMed ID: 3627208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acute side effects of iopromide and diatrizoate in urography.
Sahin H; Bircan MK; Akay AF; Kuru AF
Acta Radiol; 1998 Nov; 39(6):734-5. PubMed ID: 9817053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anticoagulant effects of nonionic versus ionic contrast media in angiography syringes.
Grabowski EF; Kaplan KL; Halpern EF
Invest Radiol; 1991 May; 26(5):417-21. PubMed ID: 2055738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective randomized trial of iohexol 350 versus meglumine sodium diatrizoate as an oral contrast agent for abdominopelvic computed tomography.
Peterson CM; Lin M; Pilgram T; Heiken JP
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 21412090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Intolerance reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media in cardiac diagnosis. A randomized double-blind study].
Machraoui A; Hinrichsen M; Jäger D; Lemke B; Drews S; Lange S; Barmeyer J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1991 Mar; 116(9):321-6. PubMed ID: 1997305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic efficacy of excretory urography with low-dose, nonionic contrast media.
Gavant ML; Ellis JV; Klesges LM
Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):657-60. PubMed ID: 1535877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Allergic reaction following micturating cystourethrography.
Bettenay F; de Campo J
Urol Radiol; 1989; 11(3):167-8. PubMed ID: 2595875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in intravenous urography: clinical trial in 1,000 consecutive patients.
Jacobsson BF; Jorulf H; Kalantar MS; Narasimham DL
Radiology; 1988 Jun; 167(3):601-5. PubMed ID: 3283830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
