These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2055736)

  • 1. Comparison of the rates of adverse drug reactions. Ionic contrast agents, ionic agents combined with steroids, and nonionic agents.
    Wolf GL; Mishkin MM; Roux SG; Halpern EF; Gottlieb J; Zimmerman J; Gillen J; Thellman C
    Invest Radiol; 1991 May; 26(5):404-10. PubMed ID: 2055736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nephrotoxicity of ionic and nonionic contrast media in 1196 patients: a randomized trial. The Iohexol Cooperative Study.
    Rudnick MR; Goldfarb S; Wexler L; Ludbrook PA; Murphy MJ; Halpern EF; Hill JA; Winniford M; Cohen MB; VanFossen DB
    Kidney Int; 1995 Jan; 47(1):254-61. PubMed ID: 7731155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multicenter trial of ionic versus nonionic contrast media for cardiac angiography. The Iohexol Cooperative Study.
    Hill JA; Winniford M; Cohen MB; Van Fossen DB; Murphy MJ; Halpern EF; Ludbrook PA; Wexler L; Rudnick MR; Goldfarb S
    Am J Cardiol; 1993 Oct; 72(11):770-5. PubMed ID: 8213508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of iohexol 300 and diatrizoate meglumine 60 for body CT: image quality, adverse reactions, and aborted/repeated examinations.
    Bernardino ME; Fishman EK; Jeffrey RB; Brown PC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):665-7. PubMed ID: 1739017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The comparative effects of ionic versus nonionic agents in cardiac catheterization.
    Benotti JR
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Nov; 23 Suppl 2():S366-73. PubMed ID: 3058641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of iohexol in patients with previous reactions to ionic contrast material. A multicenter clinical trial.
    Siegle RL; Halvorsen RA; Dillon J; Gavant ML; Halpern E
    Invest Radiol; 1991 May; 26(5):411-6. PubMed ID: 2055737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pretreatment with corticosteroids to prevent adverse reactions to nonionic contrast media.
    Lasser EC; Berry CC; Mishkin MM; Williamson B; Zheutlin N; Silverman JM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):523-6. PubMed ID: 8109489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective trial of ionic vs nonionic contrast agents in routine clinical practice: comparison of adverse effects.
    Wolf GL; Arenson RL; Cross AP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 May; 152(5):939-44. PubMed ID: 2495706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of patient reactions and diagnostic quality for hysterosalpingography using ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Chen MY; Zagoria RJ; Fayez JA; Ott DJ; Van Swearingen FL
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Feb; 2(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 9419535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advantages of nonionic contrast agents in adult urography.
    Dray RJ; Winfield AC; Muhletaler CA; Kirchner FK
    Urology; 1984 Sep; 24(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 6382739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Iohexol for excretory urography: a comparative study.
    Winfield AC; Dray RJ; Kirchner FK; Muhletaler CA; Price RR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Sep; 141(3):571-3. PubMed ID: 6349311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast bolus dynamic computed tomography for the measurement of solid organ perfusion.
    Blomley MJ; Coulden R; Bufkin C; Lipton MJ; Dawson P
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S72-7; discussion S78. PubMed ID: 8282508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pretreatment with corticosteroids to alleviate reactions to intravenous contrast material.
    Lasser EC; Berry CC; Talner LB; Santini LC; Lang EK; Gerber FH; Stolberg HO
    N Engl J Med; 1987 Oct; 317(14):845-9. PubMed ID: 3627208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acute side effects of iopromide and diatrizoate in urography.
    Sahin H; Bircan MK; Akay AF; Kuru AF
    Acta Radiol; 1998 Nov; 39(6):734-5. PubMed ID: 9817053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anticoagulant effects of nonionic versus ionic contrast media in angiography syringes.
    Grabowski EF; Kaplan KL; Halpern EF
    Invest Radiol; 1991 May; 26(5):417-21. PubMed ID: 2055738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective randomized trial of iohexol 350 versus meglumine sodium diatrizoate as an oral contrast agent for abdominopelvic computed tomography.
    Peterson CM; Lin M; Pilgram T; Heiken JP
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 21412090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Intolerance reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media in cardiac diagnosis. A randomized double-blind study].
    Machraoui A; Hinrichsen M; Jäger D; Lemke B; Drews S; Lange S; Barmeyer J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1991 Mar; 116(9):321-6. PubMed ID: 1997305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic efficacy of excretory urography with low-dose, nonionic contrast media.
    Gavant ML; Ellis JV; Klesges LM
    Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):657-60. PubMed ID: 1535877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Allergic reaction following micturating cystourethrography.
    Bettenay F; de Campo J
    Urol Radiol; 1989; 11(3):167-8. PubMed ID: 2595875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in intravenous urography: clinical trial in 1,000 consecutive patients.
    Jacobsson BF; Jorulf H; Kalantar MS; Narasimham DL
    Radiology; 1988 Jun; 167(3):601-5. PubMed ID: 3283830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.