These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20557885)
1. An intention-to-treat study of total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Heaton RL; Walid MS Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Oct; 111(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 20557885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy. Schindlbeck C; Klauser K; Dian D; Janni W; Friese K Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Apr; 277(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 17938945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accessibility and surgical outcomes of transumbilical single-port laparoscopy using straight instruments for hysterectomy in difficult conditions. Huang CY; Wu KY; Su H; Han CM; Wu PJ; Wang CJ; Lee CL; Yen CF Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 53(4):471-5. PubMed ID: 25510685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience. Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of clinical effects between total vaginal hysterectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy on large uteruses over 300 grams. Kim HB; Song JE; Kim GH; Cho HY; Lee KY J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Jun; 36(3):656-60. PubMed ID: 20598052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of power morcellator removal on hysterectomy practice patterns. Wesol A; Woolley S Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Aug; 215():41-44. PubMed ID: 28599164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus standard laparoscopic hysterectomy. Winter ML; Leu SY; Lagrew DC; Bustillo G J Robot Surg; 2015 Dec; 9(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 26530837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Learning curves for laparoscopic hysterectomy after implementation of minimally invasive surgery. Mavrova R; Radosa JC; Wagenpfeil G; Hamza A; Solomayer EF; Juhasz-Böss I Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Aug; 134(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 27233815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Teaching of total laparoscopic hysterectomy in a gynecological laparoscopy university diploma course]. Morgan Ortiz F; López Zepeda MA Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2011 Sep; 79(9):547-52. PubMed ID: 21966855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical outcome and cost comparison between total vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri weighing >500 g. Cho HY; Park ST; Kim HB; Kang SW; Park SH J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 23932973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Guidelines to determine the route of hysterectomy. Kovac SR Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 85(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 7800317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Hohl instrument for optimizing total laparoscopic hysterectomy: results of more than 500 procedures in a university training center. Mueller A; Boosz A; Koch M; Jud S; Faschingbauer F; Schrauder M; Löhberg C; Mehlhorn G; Renner SP; Lux MP; Beckmann MW; Thiel FC Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Jan; 285(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 21475962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy using a percutaneous surgical system: a pilot study towards scarless surgery. Rossitto C; Gueli Alletti S; Rotolo S; Cianci S; Panico G; Scambia G Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():132-5. PubMed ID: 27289066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preoperative assessment by magnetic resonance imaging is useful for planning the treatment of an enlarged uterus by total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Hatta K; Terai Y; Okuda K; Nakamura Y; Yoo S; Tanaka Y; Tsunetoh S; Hayashi A; Yamashita Y; Ohmichi M J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Apr; 39(4):814-9. PubMed ID: 23379476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without the use of barbed suture. Bassi A; Tulandi T J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Aug; 35(8):718-722. PubMed ID: 24007707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study. Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) versus coagulation of uterine arteries (CUA) at their origin plus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for the management of myoma and adenomyosis. Pan HS; Ko ML; Huang LW; Chang JZ; Hwang JL; Chen SC Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2008; 17(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 18850461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized comparison of total laparoscopic, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and vaginal hysterectomies for myomatous uteri. Sesti F; Cosi V; Calonzi F; Ruggeri V; Pietropolli A; Di Francesco L; Piccione E Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 290(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 24710800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]