BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20557940)

  • 1. Accuracy of RTVue optical coherence tomography, Pentacam, and ultrasonic pachymetry for the measurement of central corneal thickness.
    Nam SM; Im CY; Lee HK; Kim EK; Kim TI; Seo KY
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Nov; 117(11):2096-103. PubMed ID: 20557940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Central corneal thickness measurements with Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography versus ultrasonic pachymetry and rotating Scheimpflug camera.
    Ishibazawa A; Igarashi S; Hanada K; Nagaoka T; Ishiko S; Ito H; Yoshida A
    Cornea; 2011 Jun; 30(6):615-9. PubMed ID: 21282999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Oculus Pentacam and Stratus optical coherence tomography for measurement of central corneal thickness.
    Ceylan OM; Turk A; Erdurman C; Mumcuoglu T; Erdem U; Gokce G; Dagli S
    Cornea; 2011 Jun; 30(6):670-4. PubMed ID: 21242780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement of central corneal thickness by high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging, Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry.
    Chen S; Huang J; Wen D; Chen W; Huang D; Wang Q
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Aug; 90(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 20560892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Central corneal thickness measurement.
    Rao HL; Pahuja S; Murthy SI; Senthil S
    Ophthalmology; 2011 May; 118(5):1010; author reply 1010. PubMed ID: 21539994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparison between Scheimpflug imaging and optical coherence tomography in measuring corneal thickness.
    Huang J; Ding X; Savini G; Pan C; Feng Y; Cheng D; Hua Y; Hu X; Wang Q
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Oct; 120(10):1951-8. PubMed ID: 23672973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Central and peripheral corneal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography, Scheimpflug imaging, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal, keratoconus-suspect, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes.
    Prospero Ponce CM; Rocha KM; Smith SD; Krueger RR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jun; 35(6):1055-62. PubMed ID: 19465292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of central corneal thickness measurement with slit-lamp optical coherence tomography and visante optical coherence tomography.
    Li H; Leung CK; Wong L; Cheung CY; Pang CP; Weinreb RN; Lam DS
    Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):796-801.e2. PubMed ID: 17916376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Agreement among 3 methods to measure corneal thickness: ultrasound pachymetry, Orbscan II, and Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
    Li EY; Mohamed S; Leung CK; Rao SK; Cheng AC; Cheung CY; Lam DS
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Oct; 114(10):1842-7. PubMed ID: 17507097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of central corneal thickness measurement with RTVue spectral domain optical coherence tomography in normal subjects.
    Rao HL; Kumar AU; Kumar A; Chary S; Senthil S; Vaddavalli PK; Garudadri CS
    Cornea; 2011 Feb; 30(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 20885314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between central corneal thickness measurements by oculus pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry.
    Al-Mezaine HS; Al-Amro SA; Kangave D; Sadaawy A; Wehaib TA; Al-Obeidan S
    Int Ophthalmol; 2008 Oct; 28(5):333-8. PubMed ID: 17898935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Average 3-dimensional models for the comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam pachymetry maps in normal corneas.
    Bourges JL; Alfonsi N; Laliberté JF; Chagnon M; Renard G; Legeais JM; Brunette I
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Nov; 116(11):2064-71. PubMed ID: 19744719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement in keratoconus using the rotating Scheimpflug camera and ultrasound pachymetry.
    de Sanctis U; Missolungi A; Mutani B; Richiardi L; Grignolo FM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 144(5):712-718. PubMed ID: 17869208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measured using LenStar LS900, Pentacam, and Visante AS-OCT.
    OʼDonnell C; Hartwig A; Radhakrishnan H
    Cornea; 2012 Sep; 31(9):983-8. PubMed ID: 22367044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of the corneal thickness measurements with the Pentacam HR imaging system and ultrasound pachymetry.
    Módis L; Szalai E; Németh G; Berta A
    Cornea; 2011 May; 30(5):561-6. PubMed ID: 21139499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comprehensive comparison of central corneal thickness measurement.
    Huang J; Pesudovs K; Yu A; Wright T; Wen D; Li M; Yu Y; Wang Q
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 88(8):940-9. PubMed ID: 21602731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry.
    Barkana Y; Gerber Y; Elbaz U; Schwartz S; Ken-Dror G; Avni I; Zadok D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Sep; 31(9):1729-35. PubMed ID: 16246776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of central and peripheral corneal thickness measurements with scanning-slit, Scheimpflug and Fourier-domain ocular coherence tomography.
    Randleman JB; Lynn MJ; Perez-Straziota CE; Weissman HM; Kim SW
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 99(9):1176-81. PubMed ID: 25824260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, noncontact tonopachy, Pentacam HR, and Fourier-domain OCT.
    Kim JS; Rho CR; Cho YW; Shin J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Apr; 100(16):e25638. PubMed ID: 33879743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Central corneal thickness measurements: using an ultrasonic instrument and 4 optical instruments.
    Williams R; Fink BA; King-Smith PE; Mitchell GL
    Cornea; 2011 Nov; 30(11):1238-43. PubMed ID: 21926567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.