409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20559157)
1. Novel method for analyzing snellen visual acuity measurements.
Gregori NZ; Feuer W; Rosenfeld PJ
Retina; 2010; 30(7):1046-50. PubMed ID: 20559157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Repeatability and reliability of the visual acuity examination on logMAR ETDRS and Snellen chart].
Veselý P; Synek S
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2012 May; 68(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 22913870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of letter separation on computerised visual acuity measurements: comparison with the gold standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.
Shah N; Laidlaw DA; Brown G; Robson C
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Mar; 30(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 20444125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Thai logarithmic visual acuity chart.
Ruamviboonsuk P; Tiensuwan M
J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Jun; 85(6):673-81. PubMed ID: 12322840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of visual acuity in macular degeneration patients measured with snellen and early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts.
Falkenstein IA; Cochran DE; Azen SP; Dustin L; Tammewar AM; Kozak I; Freeman WR
Ophthalmology; 2008 Feb; 115(2):319-23. PubMed ID: 17706288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The development of a "reduced logMAR" visual acuity chart for use in routine clinical practice.
Rosser DA; Laidlaw DA; Murdoch IE
Br J Ophthalmol; 2001 Apr; 85(4):432-6. PubMed ID: 11264133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and Validation of a Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test (Peek Acuity) for Clinical Practice and Community-Based Fieldwork.
Bastawrous A; Rono HK; Livingstone IA; Weiss HA; Jordan S; Kuper H; Burton MJ
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 133(8):930-7. PubMed ID: 26022921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years.
Rice ML; Leske DA; Holmes JM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 137(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 14962417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of the threshold interpolation and whole-line method on logMAR chart and Snellen chart for visual acuity testing].
Veselý P; Ventruba J
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2009 Oct; 65(5):191-4. PubMed ID: 20052823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors Contributing to Discrepancy Between Visual Acuity Fractions Derived From a Snellen Chart and Letter Scores on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Chart.
Chen FK; Agelis LE; Peh KK; Teong J; Wong EN
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila); 2014; 3(5):277-85. PubMed ID: 26107914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of a computerised logMAR visual acuity measurement system (COMPlog): comparison with ETDRS and the electronic ETDRS testing algorithm in adults and amblyopic children.
Laidlaw DA; Tailor V; Shah N; Atamian S; Harcourt C
Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 92(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 17993577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving on ETDRS acuities: design and results for a computerised thresholding device.
Rosser DA; Murdoch IE; Fitzke FW; Laidlaw DA
Eye (Lond); 2003 Aug; 17(6):701-6. PubMed ID: 12928680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between vision impairment and eye disease to vision-specific quality of life and function in rural India: the Aravind Comprehensive Eye Survey.
Nirmalan PK; Tielsch JM; Katz J; Thulasiraj RD; Krishnadas R; Ramakrishnan R; Robin AL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2308-12. PubMed ID: 15980215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Calculating the mean visual acuity and the change in visual acuity with a decimal acuity chart].
Touzeau O
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2003 Jun; 26(6):586-90. PubMed ID: 12910197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reading performance in patients with retinitis pigmentosa: a study using the MNREAD charts.
Virgili G; Pierrottet C; Parmeggiani F; Pennino M; Giacomelli G; Steindler P; Menchini U; Orzalesi N;
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Oct; 45(10):3418-24. PubMed ID: 15452044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An innovative visual acuity chart for urgent and primary care settings: validation of the Runge near vision card.
Cooke MD; Winter PA; McKenney KC; Packard KL; Williams V; Dorsey EA; Szabo A; Visotcky A; Warren CC; Wirostko WJ; Weinberg DV; Kim JE; Han DP
Eye (Lond); 2019 Jul; 33(7):1104-1110. PubMed ID: 30792525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visual acuity scored by the letter-by-letter or probit methods has lower retest variability than the line assignment method.
Vanden Bosch ME; Wall M
Eye (Lond); 1997; 11 ( Pt 3)():411-7. PubMed ID: 9373488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the statistical reliability of letter-chart visual acuity measurements.
Arditi A; Cagenello R
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Jan; 34(1):120-9. PubMed ID: 8425819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective evaluation of visual acuity assessment: a comparison of snellen versus ETDRS charts in clinical practice (An AOS Thesis).
Kaiser PK
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2009 Dec; 107():311-24. PubMed ID: 20126505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the ETDRS logMAR, 'compact reduced logMar' and Snellen charts in routine clinical practice.
Lim LA; Frost NA; Powell RJ; Hewson P
Eye (Lond); 2010 Apr; 24(4):673-7. PubMed ID: 19557025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
