These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20559899)
21. The once and future debate on human embryonic stem cell research. Latham SR Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2009; 9 Suppl():483-94. PubMed ID: 19757716 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Celebrating 10 years of hESC lines: an interview with Rudolf Jaenisch. Jaenisch R Stem Cells; 2008 Dec; 26(12):3005-7. PubMed ID: 19112652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Promoting life?: Embryonic stem cell research legislation. Miller JF Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2003; 52(2):437-79. PubMed ID: 15214335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. What history tells us VII. Twenty-five years ago: the production of mouse embryonic stem cells. Morange M J Biosci; 2006 Dec; 31(5):537-41. PubMed ID: 17301490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The stem cell debate. Wagner W; Weide U J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2006; 22(2):409-12. PubMed ID: 17117703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Oliver Brüstle: fighting for stem cell research in Germany. Stafford N Lancet; 2005 Oct 29-Nov 4; 366(9496):1521. PubMed ID: 16257332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Research ethics. The NIH draft guidelines on human stem cell research. Majumder MA; Cohen CB Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5935):1648-9. PubMed ID: 19556488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The more things change: the new NIH Guidelines on human stem cell research. Meyer MN; Fossett JW Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2009 Sep; 19(3):289-307. PubMed ID: 19886525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. How physicians and scientists can respond responsibly and effectively to religiously based opposition to human embryonic stem cell research. Chervenak FA; McCullough LB Fertil Steril; 2008 Dec; 90(6):2056-9. PubMed ID: 18178193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The business of stem cells. Spar D N Engl J Med; 2004 Jul; 351(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 15254279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The Obama effect? Wilkinson E Lancet; 2009 Jun; 373(9682):2185. PubMed ID: 19582888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Embryonic stem cell research controversy: focus on the private sector and international sphere. Kim S Hastings Womens Law J; 2003; 14(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 16032810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Federal funding of human embryonic stem cell research: an institutional examination. Fujikawa R South Calif Law Rev; 2005 May; 78(4):1075-124. PubMed ID: 17340756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Embryos, stem cells, morality and public policy: difficult connections. Momeyer RW Cap Univ Law Rev; 2003; 31(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 15156894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Judge halts US funding of embryonic stem cell research. Roehr B BMJ; 2010 Aug; 341():c4689. PubMed ID: 20798223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The policy and politics of embryonic stem cell research. Doerflinger R Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2001; 1(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 12854534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Catholic principles in government policy: President Bush on embryonic stem cell research. Magill G Health Care Ethics USA; 2001; 9(3):E1. PubMed ID: 16184689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]