These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2056033)
1. Comparison of six media, including a semisolid agar, for the isolation of various Campylobacter species from stool specimens. Endtz HP; Ruijs GJ; Zwinderman AH; van der Reijden T; Biever M; Mouton RP J Clin Microbiol; 1991 May; 29(5):1007-10. PubMed ID: 2056033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a blood-free, charcoal-based, selective medium for the isolation of Campylobacter organisms from feces. Karmali MA; Simor AE; Roscoe M; Fleming PC; Smith SS; Lane J J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Mar; 23(3):456-9. PubMed ID: 3958143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two selective media and a membrane filter technique for isolation of Campylobacter species from diarrhoeal stools. Piersimoni C; Bornigia S; Curzi L; De Sio G Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1995 Jun; 14(6):539-42. PubMed ID: 7588831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of a selective medium and a membrane filter method for isolation of Campylobacter species from Spanish paediatric patients. López L; Castillo FJ; Clavel A; Rubio MC Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1998 Jul; 17(7):489-92. PubMed ID: 9764551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Semisolid blood-free selective-motility medium for the isolation of campylobacters from stool specimens. Goossens H; Vlaes L; Galand I; Van den Borre C; Butzler JP J Clin Microbiol; 1989 May; 27(5):1077-80. PubMed ID: 2745681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of selective medium supplemented with blood & a charcoal-based blood-free medium for primary isolation of campylobacters from human faeces. Bhadra RK; Bag PK; Pal SC; Nair GB Indian J Med Res; 1991 Jan; 93():22-5. PubMed ID: 2022396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Selective medium for thermophilic campylobacters including Campylobacter upsaliensis. Aspinall ST; Wareing DR; Hayward PG; Hutchinson DN J Clin Pathol; 1993 Sep; 46(9):829-31. PubMed ID: 8227433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modified selective medium for isolation of Campylobacter spp. from feces: comparison with Preston medium, a blood-free medium, and a filtration system. Goossens H; De Boeck M; Coignau H; Vlaes L; Van den Borre C; Butzler JP J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Nov; 24(5):840-3. PubMed ID: 3771769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Isolation of Campylobacter spp. from slaughtered cattle and swine on blood-free selective medium. Ono K; Masaki H; Tokumaru Y J Vet Med Sci; 1995 Dec; 57(6):1085-7. PubMed ID: 8720053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prevalence of Campylobacter, Arcobacter, Helicobacter, and Sutterella spp. in human fecal samples as estimated by a reevaluation of isolation methods for Campylobacters. Engberg J; On SL; Harrington CS; Gerner-Smidt P J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Jan; 38(1):286-91. PubMed ID: 10618103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of a new campylobacter selective medium (CAT) with membrane filtration for the isolation of thermophilic campylobacters including Campylobacter upsaliensis. Aspinall ST; Wareing DR; Hayward PG; Hutchinson DN J Appl Bacteriol; 1996 Jun; 80(6):645-50. PubMed ID: 8698666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of a blood-free medium and a filtration technique for the isolation of Campylobacter spp. from diarrhoeal stools of hospitalised patients in central Australia. Albert MJ; Tee W; Leach A; Asche V; Penner JL J Med Microbiol; 1992 Sep; 37(3):176-9. PubMed ID: 1518033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of some enrichment broths and growth media for the isolation of thermophilic campylobacters from surface water samples. Korhonen LK; Martikainen PJ J Appl Bacteriol; 1990 Jun; 68(6):593-9. PubMed ID: 2202704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Polycarbonate filtration technique is noninferior to mCCDA for isolation of Campylobacter species from stool samples. Nielsen HL; Ejlertsen T; Nielsen H Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2015 Sep; 83(1):11-2. PubMed ID: 26022656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of campylobacter species: a comparison of culture and polymerase chain reaction based methods. Kulkarni SP; Lever S; Logan JM; Lawson AJ; Stanley J; Shafi MS J Clin Pathol; 2002 Oct; 55(10):749-53. PubMed ID: 12354800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of isolation media for Campylobacter jejuni. Gun-Munro J; Rennie RP; Thornley JH; Richardson HL; Hodge D; Lynch J J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Dec; 25(12):2274-7. PubMed ID: 3429621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of different culture methods for the recovery of Campylobacter species from pets. Acke E; McGill K; Golden O; Jones BR; Fanning S; Whyte P Zoonoses Public Health; 2009 Nov; 56(9-10):490-5. PubMed ID: 19243565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct isolation of atypical thermophilic Campylobacter species from human feces on selective agar medium. Walmsley SL; Karmali MA J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Apr; 27(4):668-70. PubMed ID: 2723035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reassessment of selective agars and filtration techniques for isolation of Campylobacter species from faeces. Bolton FJ; Hutchinson DN; Parker G Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1988 Apr; 7(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 3134202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Basis of the superiority of cefoperazone amphotericin teicoplanin for isolating Campylobacter upsaliensis from stools. Byrne C; Doherty D; Mooney A; Byrne M; Woodward D; Johnson W; Rodgers F; Bourke B J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jul; 39(7):2713-6. PubMed ID: 11427603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]