These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2056052)

  • 1. Evaluation of the new RapID-ANA II system for the identification of clinical anaerobic isolates.
    Marler LM; Siders JA; Wolters LC; Pettigrew Y; Skitt BL; Allen SD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 May; 29(5):874-8. PubMed ID: 2056052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of the RapID-ANA II panel for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Celig DM; Schreckenberger PC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Mar; 29(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 2037661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the RapID ANA system as a four-hour method for anaerobe identification.
    Downes J; Andrew JH
    Pathology; 1988 Jul; 20(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 3060822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of the Vitek ANI card for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Schreckenberger PC; Celig DM; Janda WM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Feb; 26(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 3343321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of PRAS II, RapID ANA, and API 20A systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Karachewski NO; Busch EL; Wells CL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jan; 21(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 3881468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the RapID-ANA system for identification of anaerobic bacteria of veterinary origin.
    Adney WS; Jones RL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Dec; 22(6):980-3. PubMed ID: 3905854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the BBL Crystal Anaerobe identification system.
    Cavallaro JJ; Wiggs LS; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Dec; 35(12):3186-91. PubMed ID: 9399517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Anaerobic bacteria isolated from patients with suspected anaerobic infections].
    Ercis S; Tunçkanat F; Hasçelik G
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2005 Oct; 39(4):447-54. PubMed ID: 16544546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the ATB 32 A system for identification of anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinical specimens.
    Looney WJ; Gallusser AJ; Modde HK
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Jul; 28(7):1519-24. PubMed ID: 2199516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid enzymatic characterization of clinically encountered anaerobic bacteria with the API ZYM system.
    Marler L; Allen S; Siders J
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Aug; 3(4):294-300. PubMed ID: 6386457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the PRAS II, AN-Ident, and RapID-ANA systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Burlage RS; Ellner PD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jul; 22(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 3894412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of AN-Ident.
    Quentin C; Desailly-Chanson MA; Bebear C
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Feb; 29(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 2007629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of BBL Crystal ANR ID Kit and API rapid ID 32 A for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Moll WM; Ungerechts J; Marklein G; Schaal KP
    Zentralbl Bakteriol; 1996 Jul; 284(2-3):329-47. PubMed ID: 8837394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. API and Minitek systems in identification of clinical isolates of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli and Clostridium species.
    Hanson CW; Cassorla R; Martin WJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Jul; 10(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 387809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the Vitek 2 ANC card for identification of clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria.
    Lee EH; Degener JE; Welling GW; Veloo AC
    J Clin Microbiol; 2011 May; 49(5):1745-9. PubMed ID: 21411572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phenotypic identification of over 1000 isolates of anaerobic bacteria recovered between 1999 and 2008 in a major Costa Rican hospital.
    Rodríguez-Cavallini E; Vargas P; Rodríguez C; Quesada-Gómez C; Gamboa-Coronado MM
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2011 Jul; 17(7):1043-7. PubMed ID: 21722256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of three identification systems for anaerobes.
    Murray PR; Weber CJ; Niles AC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jul; 22(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 2862161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Specimen collection and transport, anaerobic culture techniques, and identification of anaerobes.
    Citron DM
    Rev Infect Dis; 1984; 6 Suppl 1():S51-8. PubMed ID: 6372037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of an automated system for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Arzese A; Minisini R; Botta GA
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1994 Feb; 13(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 8013485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy and reproducibility of the 4-hour ATB 32A method for anaerobe identification.
    Kitch TT; Appelbaum PC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Nov; 27(11):2509-13. PubMed ID: 2681252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.