These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20560934)
1. Optimal Combinations of Diagnostic Tests Based on AUC. Huang X; Qin G; Fang Y Biometrics; 2011 Jun; 67(2):568-76. PubMed ID: 20560934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A procedure for determining whether a simple combination of diagnostic tests may be noninferior to the theoretical optimum combination. Jin H; Lu Y Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 18556633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marker selection via maximizing the partial area under the ROC curve of linear risk scores. Wang Z; Chang YC Biostatistics; 2011 Apr; 12(2):369-85. PubMed ID: 20729218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve. Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard. Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests. Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An application of linear mixed effects model to assess the agreement between two methods with replicated observations. Roy A J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(1):150-73. PubMed ID: 19127473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimal linear combination of biomarkers for multi-category diagnosis. Hsu MJ; Chen YH Stat Med; 2016 Jan; 35(2):202-13. PubMed ID: 26250879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimation for the optimal combination of markers without modeling the censoring distribution. Chiang CT; Huang SY Biometrics; 2009 Mar; 65(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 18422791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Smooth semiparametric receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests. Wan S; Zhang B Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(12):2565-86. PubMed ID: 17072821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bayesian estimation of the receiver operating characteristic curve for a diagnostic test with a limit of detection in the absence of a gold standard. Jafarzadeh SR; Johnson WO; Utts JM; Gardner IA Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2090-106. PubMed ID: 20603894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transformation-invariant and nonparametric monotone smooth estimation of ROC curves. Du P; Tang L Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(2):349-59. PubMed ID: 18985706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variable selection in canonical discriminant analysis for family studies. Jin M; Fang Y Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 20374240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The partial area under the summary ROC curve. Walter SD Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing accuracy of mammography in the presence of verification bias and intrareader correlation. Zheng Y; Barlow WE; Cutter G Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):259-68. PubMed ID: 15737102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of the area under the ROC curve. Faraggi D; Reiser B Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(20):3093-106. PubMed ID: 12369084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A permutation test sensitive to differences in areas for comparing ROC curves from a paired design. Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2873-93. PubMed ID: 16134144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating area under the curve and relative exposure in a pharmacokinetic study with data below quantification limit. Fang L; Chen P; Ke C; Lee E J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jan; 21(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 21191855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group. Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC; Lijmer JG; Croat Med J; 2003 Oct; 44(5):639-50. PubMed ID: 14515429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]