These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20561264)

  • 1. Informed public preferences for electricity portfolios with CCS and other low-carbon technologies.
    Fleishman LA; De Bruin WB; Morgan MG
    Risk Anal; 2010 Sep; 30(9):1399-410. PubMed ID: 20561264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Informed public choices for low-carbon electricity portfolios using a computer decision tool.
    Mayer LA; Bruine de Bruin W; Morgan MG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Apr; 48(7):3640-8. PubMed ID: 24564708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Options for near-term phaseout of CO(2) emissions from coal use in the United States.
    Kharecha PA; Kutscher CF; Hansen JE; Mazria E
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jun; 44(11):4050-62. PubMed ID: 20429611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term energy and climate implications of carbon capture and storage deployment strategies in the US coal-fired electricity fleet.
    Sathre R; Masanet E
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(17):9768-76. PubMed ID: 22857130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Water use at pulverized coal power plants with postcombustion carbon capture and storage.
    Zhai H; Rubin ES; Versteeg PL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2479-85. PubMed ID: 21329343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships Program Validation Phase.
    Litynski JT; Plasynski S; McIlvried HG; Mahoney C; Srivastava RD
    Environ Int; 2008 Jan; 34(1):127-38. PubMed ID: 17950875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships program: a collaborative approach to carbon management.
    Litynski JT; Klara SM; McIlvried HG; Srivastava RD
    Environ Int; 2006 Jan; 32(1):128-44. PubMed ID: 16054694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SunShot solar power reduces costs and uncertainty in future low-carbon electricity systems.
    Mileva A; Nelson JH; Johnston J; Kammen DM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Aug; 47(16):9053-60. PubMed ID: 23865424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coal and biomass to fuels and power.
    Williams RH; Liu G; Kreutz TG; Larson ED
    Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng; 2011; 2():529-53. PubMed ID: 22432630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Co-gasification of solid waste and lignite - a case study for Western Macedonia.
    Koukouzas N; Katsiadakis A; Karlopoulos E; Kakaras E
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(7):1263-75. PubMed ID: 17631995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Room-temperature ionic liquids and composite materials: platform technologies for CO(2) capture.
    Bara JE; Camper DE; Gin DL; Noble RD
    Acc Chem Res; 2010 Jan; 43(1):152-9. PubMed ID: 19795831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Moving to a low-carbon future: perspectives on nuclear and alternative power sources.
    Morgan MG
    Health Phys; 2007 Nov; 93(5):568-70. PubMed ID: 18049235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are renewables portfolio standards cost-effective emission abatement policy?
    Dobesova K; Apt J; Lave LB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Nov; 39(22):8578-83. PubMed ID: 16323750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early public impressions of terrestrial carbon capture and storage in a coal-intensive state.
    Carley SR; Krause RM; Warren DC; Rupp JA; Graham JD
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 46(13):7086-93. PubMed ID: 22681614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sourcing of Steam and Electricity for Carbon Capture Retrofits.
    Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 51(21):12908-12917. PubMed ID: 28968494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Environmental bonds and the challenge of long-term carbon sequestration.
    Gerard D; Wilson EJ
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Feb; 90(2):1097-105. PubMed ID: 18619728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cost of carbon capture and storage for natural gas combined cycle power plants.
    Rubin ES; Zhai H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(6):3076-84. PubMed ID: 22332665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Economic Merits of Flexible Carbon Capture and Sequestration as a Compliance Strategy with the Clean Power Plan.
    Craig MT; Jaramillo P; Zhai H; Klima K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 51(3):1102-1109. PubMed ID: 28001378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing the energy penalty costs of postcombustion CCS systems with amine-storage.
    Patiño-Echeverri D; Hoppock DC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan; 46(2):1243-52. PubMed ID: 22214538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "Not in (or under) my backyard": Geographic proximity and public acceptance of carbon capture and storage facilities.
    Krause RM; Carley SR; Warren DC; Rupp JA; Graham JD
    Risk Anal; 2014 Mar; 34(3):529-40. PubMed ID: 24117789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.