These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20561264)

  • 21. Exploring the role of natural gas power plants with carbon capture and storage as a bridge to a low-carbon future.
    Babaee S; Loughlin DH
    Clean Technol Environ Policy; 2017 Dec; 20(2):379-391. PubMed ID: 32461751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Managing carbon emissions in China through building energy efficiency.
    Li J; Colombier M
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jun; 90(8):2436-47. PubMed ID: 19344996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Baseload coal investment decisions under uncertain carbon legislation.
    Bergerson JA; Lave LB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 May; 41(10):3431-6. PubMed ID: 17547159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Life cycle assessment of combustion-based electricity generation technologies integrated with carbon capture and storage: A review.
    Wang Y; Pan Z; Zhang W; Borhani TN; Li R; Zhang Z
    Environ Res; 2022 May; 207():112219. PubMed ID: 34656638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Generation, capture, and utilization of industrial carbon dioxide.
    Hunt AJ; Sin EH; Marriott R; Clark JH
    ChemSusChem; 2010 Mar; 3(3):306-22. PubMed ID: 20049768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influencing attitudes toward carbon capture and sequestration: a social marketing approach.
    Wong-Parodi G; Dowlatabadi H; McDaniels T; Ray I
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Aug; 45(16):6743-51. PubMed ID: 21728279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Competence-based and integrity-based trust as predictors of acceptance of carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS).
    Terwel BW; Harinck F; Ellemers N; Daamen DD
    Risk Anal; 2009 Aug; 29(8):1129-40. PubMed ID: 19572967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Deep CCS: Moving Beyond 90% Carbon Dioxide Capture.
    Dods MN; Kim EJ; Long JR; Weston SC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jul; 55(13):8524-8534. PubMed ID: 34157836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of initial affective impressions in responses to educational communications: the case of carbon capture and sequestration (CCS).
    Bruine de Bruin W; Wong-Parodi G
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Jun; 20(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 24708355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perspectives of Informed Citizen Panel on Low-Carbon Electricity Portfolios in Switzerland and Longer-Term Evaluation of Informational Materials.
    Volken SP; Xexakis G; Trutnevyte E
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Oct; 52(20):11478-11489. PubMed ID: 30208273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fossil-Fuel Options for Power Sector Net-Zero Emissions with Sequestration Tax Credits.
    Anderson JJ; Rode DC; Zhai H; Fischbeck PS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Aug; 56(16):11162-11171. PubMed ID: 35926127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Employment impact assessment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in China's power sector based on input-output model.
    Jiang Y; Lei Y; Yan X; Yang Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 May; 26(15):15665-15676. PubMed ID: 30949943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Environmental impact of coal industry and thermal power plants in India.
    Mishra UC
    J Environ Radioact; 2004; 72(1-2):35-40. PubMed ID: 15162853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Deployment models for commercialized carbon capture and storage.
    Esposito RA; Monroe LS; Friedman JS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 20722437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Wind deployment in the United States: states, resources, policy, and discourse.
    Wilson EJ; Stephens JC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 43(24):9063-70. PubMed ID: 20000495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Long-term affected energy production of waste to energy technologies identified by use of energy system analysis.
    Münster M; Meibom P
    Waste Manag; 2010 Dec; 30(12):2510-9. PubMed ID: 20471819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Deciding between carbon trading and carbon capture and sequestration: an optimisation-based case study for methanol synthesis from syngas.
    Üçtuğ FG; Ağralı S; Arıkan Y; Avcıoğlu E
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Jan; 132():1-8. PubMed ID: 24246850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparing Waste-to-Energy technologies by applying energy system analysis.
    Münster M; Lund H
    Waste Manag; 2010 Jul; 30(7):1251-63. PubMed ID: 19700298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Porous materials for carbon dioxide separations.
    Siegelman RL; Kim EJ; Long JR
    Nat Mater; 2021 Aug; 20(8):1060-1072. PubMed ID: 34321657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Boiler briquette coal versus raw coal: Part II--Energy, greenhouse gas, and air quality implications.
    Zhang J; Ge S; Bai Z
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2001 Apr; 51(4):534-41. PubMed ID: 11321910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.