These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20563719)

  • 1. Improving the recovery of qPCR-grade DNA from sludge and sediment.
    Bonot S; Courtois S; Block JC; Merlin C
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Aug; 87(6):2303-11. PubMed ID: 20563719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative PCR methods for RNA and DNA in marine sediments: maximizing yield while overcoming inhibition.
    Lloyd KG; Macgregor BJ; Teske A
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2010 Apr; 72(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 20059545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in amplification efficiency of standard curves in quantitative real-time PCR assays and consequences for gene quantification in environmental samples.
    Töwe S; Kleineidam K; Schloter M
    J Microbiol Methods; 2010 Sep; 82(3):338-41. PubMed ID: 20621132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improvements for comparative analysis of changes in diversity of microbial communities using internal standards in PCR-DGGE.
    Petersen DG; Dahllöf I
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2005 Aug; 53(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 16329953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DNA extraction method affects microbial community profiles from soils and sediment.
    Carrigg C; Rice O; Kavanagh S; Collins G; O'Flaherty V
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Dec; 77(4):955-64. PubMed ID: 17960375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Convenient determination of DNA extraction efficiency using an external DNA recovery standard and quantitative-competitive PCR.
    Mumy KL; Findlay RH
    J Microbiol Methods; 2004 May; 57(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 15063066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An effective method of DNA extraction for bioleaching bacteria from acid mine drainage.
    Zeng L; Huang J; Zhang Y; Qiu G; Tong J; Chen D; Zhou J; Luo X
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2008 Jul; 79(5):881-8. PubMed ID: 18481056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DNA extraction from low-biomass carbonate rock: an improved method with reduced contamination and the low-biomass contaminant database.
    Barton HA; Taylor NM; Lubbers BR; Pemberton AC
    J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Jul; 66(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 16305811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple displacement amplification as a pre-polymerase chain reaction (pre-PCR) to process difficult to amplify samples and low copy number sequences from natural environments.
    Gonzalez JM; Portillo MC; Saiz-Jimenez C
    Environ Microbiol; 2005 Jul; 7(7):1024-8. PubMed ID: 15946299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "In-gel patch electrophoresis:" a new method for environmental DNA purification.
    Roh C; Villatte F; Kim BG; Schmid RD
    Electrophoresis; 2005 Aug; 26(16):3055-61. PubMed ID: 16041698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantification of a novel group of nitrate-reducing bacteria in the environment by real-time PCR.
    López-Gutiérrez JC; Henry S; Hallet S; Martin-Laurent F; Catroux G; Philippot L
    J Microbiol Methods; 2004 Jun; 57(3):399-407. PubMed ID: 15134887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct and efficient cloning of full-length genes from environmental DNA by RT-qPCR and modified TAIL-PCR.
    Huang H; Wang G; Zhao Y; Shi P; Luo H; Yao B
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Jul; 87(3):1141-9. PubMed ID: 20422177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Concentrations of host-specific and generic fecal markers measured by quantitative PCR in raw sewage and fresh animal feces.
    Silkie SS; Nelson KL
    Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4860-71. PubMed ID: 19765792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An effective method for isolation of DNA from pig faeces and comparison of five different methods.
    Tang JN; Zeng ZG; Wang HN; Yang T; Zhang PJ; Li YL; Zhang AY; Fan WQ; Zhang Y; Yang X; Zhao SJ; Tian GB; Zou LK
    J Microbiol Methods; 2008 Dec; 75(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 18700153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimization of microbial DNA extraction and purification from raw wastewater samples for downstream pathogen detection by microarrays.
    Lemarchand K; Berthiaume F; Maynard C; Harel J; Payment P; Bayardelle P; Masson L; Brousseau R
    J Microbiol Methods; 2005 Nov; 63(2):115-26. PubMed ID: 15936096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a routine analytical procedure for nonylphenol polyethyoxylates and their biodegradation products in sludge from sewage treatment plants.
    Tateda M; Hung NV; Kaku H; Asano M; Ike M; Fujita M
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(10):101-6. PubMed ID: 11794639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Molecular quantification of sulfate-reducing microorganisms (carrying dsrAB genes) by competitive PCR in estuarine sediments.
    Leloup J; Quillet L; Oger C; Boust D; Petit F
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2004 Feb; 47(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 19712335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DNA extraction procedure affects organic-aggregate-attached bacterial community profiles from a shallow eutrophic lake.
    Tang X; Gao G; Zhu L; Chao J; Qin B
    Can J Microbiol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):776-82. PubMed ID: 19767849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Method to detect only viable cells in microbial ecology.
    Luo JF; Lin WT; Guo Y
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Mar; 86(1):377-84. PubMed ID: 20024544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.