249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20563953)
1. Benefit, risks and cost-effectiveness of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Schmidt T; Mühlberger N; Chemelli-Steingruber IE; Strasak A; Kofler B; Chemelli A; Siebert U
Rofo; 2010 Jul; 182(7):573-80. PubMed ID: 20563953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Decision-analytical model with lifetime estimation of costs and health outcomes for one-time screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in 65-year-old men.
Henriksson M; Lundgren F
Br J Surg; 2005 Aug; 92(8):976-83. PubMed ID: 16034844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in the Netherlands and Norway.
Spronk S; van Kempen BJ; Boll AP; Jørgensen JJ; Hunink MG; Kristiansen IS
Br J Surg; 2011 Nov; 98(11):1546-55. PubMed ID: 21725968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of screening women for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Wanhainen A; Lundkvist J; Bergqvist D; Björck M
J Vasc Surg; 2006 May; 43(5):908-14; discussion 914. PubMed ID: 16678681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preliminary ten year results from a randomised single centre mass screening trial for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Lindholt JS; Juul S; Fasting H; Henneberg EW
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2006 Dec; 32(6):608-14. PubMed ID: 16893663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in 65-year-old men remains cost-effective with contemporary epidemiology and management.
Svensjö S; Mani K; Björck M; Lundkvist J; Wanhainen A
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2014 Apr; 47(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 24485841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Wanhainen A; Lundkvist J; Bergqvist D; Björck M
J Vasc Surg; 2005 May; 41(5):741-51; discussion 751. PubMed ID: 15886653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of intensive smoking cessation therapy among patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Mani K; Wanhainen A; Lundkvist J; Lindström D
J Vasc Surg; 2011 Sep; 54(3):628-36. PubMed ID: 21620630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Lindholt JS
Dan Med Bull; 2010 Dec; 57(12):B4219. PubMed ID: 21122465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms based on five year results from a randomised hospital based mass screening trial.
Lindholt JS; Juul S; Fasting H; Henneberg EW
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2006 Jul; 32(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16603390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm saves lives at a reasonable cost].
Swedenborg J; Björck M; Wanhainen A; Bergqvist D
Lakartidningen; 2003 May; 100(21):1886-91. PubMed ID: 12815873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm among patients referred to the vascular laboratory is cost-effective.
Mani K; Alund M; Björck M; Lundkvist J; Wanhainen A
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 19942460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for hepatitis C virus infection.
Sroczynski G; Esteban E; Conrads-Frank A; Schwarzer R; Mühlberger N; Wright D; Zeuzem S; Siebert U
Eur J Public Health; 2009 Jun; 19(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 19196737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Hospital costs and benefits of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Results from a randomized screening trial].
Lindholt JS; Juul S; Fasting H; Vammen S; Henneberg EW
Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Feb; 165(6):579-83. PubMed ID: 12608026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Michaels JA; Drury D; Thomas SM
Br J Surg; 2005 Aug; 92(8):960-7. PubMed ID: 16034841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in patients with type 2 diabetes on oral anti-diabetes drugs: cost-effectiveness in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain.
Tunis SL; Willis WD; Foos V
Curr Med Res Opin; 2010 Jan; 26(1):163-75. PubMed ID: 19919377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening individuals with intracranial aneurysms for abdominal aortic aneurysms is cost-effective based on estimated coprevalence.
Ball BZ; Jiang B; Mehndiratta P; Stukenborg GJ; Upchurch GR; Meschia JF; Worrall BB; Southerland AM
J Vasc Surg; 2016 Sep; 64(3):811-818.e3. PubMed ID: 27565600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revisiting the cost-effectiveness of screening 65-year-old men for abdominal aortic aneurysm based on data from an implemented screening programme.
Hager J; Henriksson M; Carlsson P; Länne T; Lundgren F
Int Angiol; 2017 Dec; 36(6):517-525. PubMed ID: 27905693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimal screening strategy for familial intracranial aneurysms: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Bor AS; Koffijberg H; Wermer MJ; Rinkel GJ
Neurology; 2010 May; 74(21):1671-9. PubMed ID: 20498435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of endovascular versus open surgical repair of acute abdominal aortic aneurysms based on worldwide experience.
Hayes PD; Sadat U; Walsh SR; Noorani A; Tang TY; Bowden DJ; Gillard JH; Boyle JR
J Endovasc Ther; 2010 Apr; 17(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 20426633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
