400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20564099)
21. A novel lymph node staging system for gastric cancer including modified Union for cancer Control/American Joint Committee on cancer and Japanese Gastric Cancer Association criteria.
Gong Y; Pan S; Wang X; Zhu G; Xu H; Zhu Z
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Oct; 46(10 Pt B):e27-e32. PubMed ID: 32631708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prognostic implications of the seventh edition of the international union against cancer classification for patients with gastric cancer: the Western experience of patients treated in a single-center European institution.
Reim D; Loos M; Vogl F; Novotny A; Schuster T; Langer R; Becker K; Höfler H; Siveke J; Bassermann F; Friess H; Schuhmacher C
J Clin Oncol; 2013 Jan; 31(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 23213098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Updates in the 8th edition of the TNM staging system for esophagus and esophagogastric junction cancer.
Daiko H; Kato K
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2020 Aug; 50(8):847-851. PubMed ID: 32519741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Updates in the Eighth Edition of the Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging Classification for Urologic Cancers.
Paner GP; Stadler WM; Hansel DE; Montironi R; Lin DW; Amin MB
Eur Urol; 2018 Apr; 73(4):560-569. PubMed ID: 29325693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Can lymph node ratio replace pn categories in the tumor-node-metastasis classification system for esophageal cancer?
Tan Z; Ma G; Yang H; Zhang L; Rong T; Lin P
J Thorac Oncol; 2014 Aug; 9(8):1214-21. PubMed ID: 25157776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration: pathologic staging data.
Rice TW; Chen LQ; Hofstetter WL; Smithers BM; Rusch VW; Wijnhoven BP; Chen KL; Davies AR; D'Journo XB; Kesler KA; Luketich JD; Ferguson MK; Räsänen JV; van Hillegersberg R; Fang W; Durand L; Cecconello I; Allum WH; Cerfolio RJ; Pera M; Griffin SM; Burger R; Liu JF; Allen MS; Law S; Watson TJ; Darling GE; Scott WJ; Duranceau A; Denlinger CE; Schipper PH; Lerut TE; Orringer MB; Ishwaran H; Apperson-Hansen C; DiPaola LM; Semple ME; Blackstone EH
Dis Esophagus; 2016 Oct; 29(7):724-733. PubMed ID: 27731547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Lymph node ratio-based staging system for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Chen SB; Weng HR; Wang G; Zou XF; Liu DT; Chen YP; Zhang H
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jun; 21(24):7514-21. PubMed ID: 26139998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparing the 7th and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control TNM staging system for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated by definitive radiotherapy.
Inada M; Nishimura Y; Ishikawa K; Nakamatsu K; Wada Y; Uehara T; Fukuda K; Anami S; Doi H; Kanamori S
Esophagus; 2019 Oct; 16(4):371-376. PubMed ID: 31111308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Effect of number of metastatic lymph nodes and metastatic lymph node ratio on the prognosis in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction after curative resection].
Zhang H; Chen C; Yue J; Ma M; Ma Z; Yu Z
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2014 Feb; 36(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 24796465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of the nodal status in the 7th edition of the UICC-TNM classification for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: proposed modifications for improved survival stratification : impact of lymph node metastases on overall survival after esophagectomy.
Yamasaki M; Miyata H; Miyazaki Y; Takahashi T; Kurokawa Y; Nakajima K; Takiguchi S; Mori M; Doki Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Sep; 21(9):2850-6. PubMed ID: 24728822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Development trend of assessment system in gastric cancer based on evolution of staging criteria].
Sun L
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1113-1120. PubMed ID: 30370509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cohort study based on the seventh edition of the TNM classification for gastric cancer: proposal of a new staging system.
Warneke VS; Behrens HM; Hartmann JT; Held H; Becker T; Schwarz NT; Röcken C
J Clin Oncol; 2011 Jun; 29(17):2364-71. PubMed ID: 21537040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Confirmation of the eighth edition of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for HPV-mediated oropharyngeal cancer in Japan.
Mizumachi T; Homma A; Sakashita T; Kano S; Hatakeyama H; Fukuda S
Int J Clin Oncol; 2017 Aug; 22(4):682-689. PubMed ID: 28271391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [The new TNM classification of tumors of the esophagogastric junction. Surgical consequences].
Schuhmacher C; Novotny A; Feith M; Friess H
Chirurg; 2012 Jan; 83(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 22090018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Comparison of the superiority of different TNM staging systems in Siewert III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction].
Lu Y; Xi H; Xie T; Qiu Z; Wang X; Wei B; Chen L
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 22(2):143-148. PubMed ID: 30799536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of the 8th UICC staging system for esophageal and gastric cancers in Siewert type II junctional adenocarcinomas.
Karstens KF; Ghadban T; Sawez S; Konczalla L; Woestemeier A; Bachmann K; Uzunoglu FG; Tachezy M; Vettorazzi E; Izbicki JR; Reeh M
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Apr; 46(4 Pt A):638-643. PubMed ID: 31879051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of postoperative TNM stages after neoadjuvant therapy on prognosis of adenocarcinoma of the gastro-oesophageal junction tumours.
Thomaschewski M; Hummel R; Petrova E; Knief J; Wellner UF; Keck T; Bausch D
World J Gastroenterol; 2018 Apr; 24(13):1429-1439. PubMed ID: 29632424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Refining esophageal cancer staging after neoadjuvant therapy: importance of treatment response.
Barbour AP; Jones M; Gonen M; Gotley DC; Thomas J; Thomson DB; Burmeister B; Smithers BM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2894-902. PubMed ID: 18663531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union against cancer classification of lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma in comparison with the Japanese classification.
Ichikura T; Tomimatsu S; Uefuji K; Kimura M; Uchida T; Morita D; Mochizuki H
Cancer; 1999 Aug; 86(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 10440681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prospective impact of tumor grade assessment in biopsies on tumor stage and prognostic grouping in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: relevance of the seventh edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual revision.
Dikken JL; Coit DG; Klimstra DS; Rizk NP; van Grieken N; Ilson D; Tang LH
Cancer; 2012 Jan; 118(2):349-57. PubMed ID: 21720993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
