87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20564321)
1. New prospective for non-invasive detection, grading, size evaluation, and tumor location of prostate cancer.
Cortesi M; Fridman E; Volkov A; Shilstein SSh; Chechik R; Breskin A; Vartsky D; Raviv G; Ramon J
Prostate; 2010 Nov; 70(15):1701-8. PubMed ID: 20564321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical assessment of the cancer diagnostic value of prostatic zinc: a comprehensive needle-biopsy study.
Cortesi M; Fridman E; Volkov A; Shilstein SSh; Chechik R; Breskin A; Vartsky D; Kleinman N; Kogan G; Moriel E; Gladysh V; Huszar M; Ramon J; Raviv G
Prostate; 2008 Jun; 68(9):994-1006. PubMed ID: 18386292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors.
Jack GS; Cookson MS; Coffey CS; Vader V; Roberts RL; Chang SS; Smith JA; Shappell SB
J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 12131301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the cancer detection and grading potential of prostatic-zinc imaging: a simulation study.
Cortesi M; Chechik R; Breskin A; Vartsky D; Ramon J; Raviv G; Volkov A; Fridman E
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(3):781-96. PubMed ID: 19131675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved prostate cancer detection using systematic 14-core biopsy for large prostate glands with normal digital rectal examination findings.
Inahara M; Suzuki H; Kojima S; Komiya A; Fukasawa S; Imamoto T; Naya Y; Ichikawa T
Urology; 2006 Oct; 68(4):815-9. PubMed ID: 17070359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High-grade foamy gland prostatic adenocarcinoma on biopsy or transurethral resection: a morphologic study of 55 cases.
Zhao J; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Apr; 33(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19033862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of digital rectal examination and biopsy results with the radical prostatectomy specimen.
Obek C; Louis P; Civantos F; Soloway MS
J Urol; 1999 Feb; 161(2):494-8; discussion 498-9. PubMed ID: 9915434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The independent impact of extended pattern biopsy on prostate cancer stage migration.
Master VA; Chi T; Simko JP; Weinberg V; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1789-93; discussion 1793. PubMed ID: 16217288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Under staging and under grading in a contemporary series of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: results from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor database.
Grossfeld GD; Chang JJ; Broering JM; Li YP; Lubeck DP; Flanders SC; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):851-6. PubMed ID: 11176485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prostate biopsy: who, how and when. An update.
Djavan B; Milani S; Remzi M
Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():44-8; discussion 99-100. PubMed ID: 15780165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Micro-focal prostate cancer: a comparison of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen features.
Boccon-Gibod LM; Dumonceau O; Toublanc M; Ravery V; Boccon-Gibod LA
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):895-9. PubMed ID: 16125298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The value of cytological grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Comparison of the clinical state, the Gleason score and grade in 69 cases].
Piaton E; Mouriquand J; Berger N; Mouriquand P; Seigneurin D; Devonec M; Perrin P
J Urol (Paris); 1990; 96(4):211-6. PubMed ID: 2212719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating localized prostate cancer and identifying candidates for focal therapy.
Sartor AO; Hricak H; Wheeler TM; Coleman J; Penson DF; Carroll PR; Rubin MA; Scardino PT
Urology; 2008 Dec; 72(6 Suppl):S12-24. PubMed ID: 19095124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The role of prostate specific antigen in diagnosis of localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Nara Uro-Oncology Research Group].
Hirao Y; Ozono S; Kagebayashi Y; Yoshi M; Tani Y; Uemura H; Momose H; Okajima E
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1996 Oct; 42(10):795-804. PubMed ID: 8951478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of extraprostatic cancer by prostate specific antigen density, endorectal MRI, and biopsy Gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer.
Horiguchi A; Nakashima J; Horiguchi Y; Nakagawa K; Oya M; Ohigashi T; Marumo K; Murai M
Prostate; 2003 Jun; 56(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12746843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
