291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20564401)
41. Melanoma of the penis, scrotum and male urethra: a 40-year single institution experience.
Sánchez-Ortiz R; Huang SF; Tamboli P; Prieto VG; Hester G; Pettaway CA
J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):1958-65. PubMed ID: 15879790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Unreliability of modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for clinical staging of penile carcinoma.
Lopes A; Rossi BM; Fonseca FP; Morini S
Cancer; 1996 May; 77(10):2099-102. PubMed ID: 8640676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Association of lymphadenectomy and survival in stage I ovarian cancer patients.
Chan JK; Munro EG; Cheung MK; Husain A; Teng NN; Berek JS; Osann K
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jan; 109(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17197582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The potential therapeutic role of lymph node resection in epithelial ovarian cancer: a study of 13918 patients.
Chan JK; Urban R; Hu JM; Shin JY; Husain A; Teng NN; Berek JS; Osann K; Kapp DS
Br J Cancer; 2007 Jun; 96(12):1817-22. PubMed ID: 17519907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. National surgical patterns of care: regional lymphadenectomy of breast sarcomas.
Gullett NP; Delman K; Folpe AL; Johnstone PA
Am J Clin Oncol; 2007 Oct; 30(5):461-5. PubMed ID: 17921704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Factors influencing aggressive therapy for bladder cancer: an analysis of data from the SEER program.
Konety BR; Joslyn SA
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1765-71. PubMed ID: 14532772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The impact of lymph node number on survival in patients with lymph node-negative pancreatic cancer.
Hellan M; Sun CL; Artinyan A; Mojica-Manosa P; Bhatia S; Ellenhorn JD; Kim J
Pancreas; 2008 Jul; 37(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 18580439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Anatomical mapping of lymphatic drainage in penile carcinoma with SPECT-CT: implications for the extent of inguinal lymph node dissection.
Leijte JA; Valdés Olmos RA; Nieweg OE; Horenblas S
Eur Urol; 2008 Oct; 54(4):885-90. PubMed ID: 18502024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Resection for gastric cancer in the community.
van de Velde CJ
Semin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 32(6 Suppl 9):S90-3. PubMed ID: 16399441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Penile cancer in 2010: update from the Oncology Committee of the French Association of Urology: external genital organs group (CCAFU-OGE)].
Souillac I; Avances C; Camparo P; Culine S; Durand X; Haie-Meder C; Sebe P; Soulie M; Rigaud J
Prog Urol; 2011 Dec; 21(13):909-16. PubMed ID: 22118355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Modified technique of radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma: morbidity and outcome.
Yao K; Tu H; Li YH; Qin ZK; Liu ZW; Zhou FJ; Han H
J Urol; 2010 Aug; 184(2):546-52. PubMed ID: 20620415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Controversies over regional lymphadenectomy in carcinoma of the penis].
Cózar Olmo JM; Navarro J; de la Peña J; Cisneros J; Cárcamo Valor P; García-Matres MJ; Martínez-Piñeiro L; Martínez-Piñeiro JA
Arch Esp Urol; 1991 Oct; 44(8):951-5. PubMed ID: 1796857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Impact of lymphadenectomy and nodal burden in renal cell carcinoma: retrospective analysis of the National Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.
Joslyn SA; Sirintrapun SJ; Konety BR
Urology; 2005 Apr; 65(4):675-80. PubMed ID: 15833507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Differences in Survival Associated with Performance of Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Invasive Penile Cancer: Results from the National Cancer Database.
Correa AF; Handorf E; Joshi SS; Geynisman DM; Kutikov A; Chen DY; Uzzo RG; Viterbo R; Greenberg RE; Smaldone MC
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1238-1244. PubMed ID: 29248557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The benefits of adjuvant radiation therapy after therapeutic lymphadenectomy for clinically advanced, high-risk, lymph node-metastatic melanoma.
Agrawal S; Kane JM; Guadagnolo BA; Kraybill WG; Ballo MT
Cancer; 2009 Dec; 115(24):5836-44. PubMed ID: 19701906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Controversies in ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy for cancer of the penis.
Abi-Aad AS; deKernion JB
Urol Clin North Am; 1992 May; 19(2):319-24. PubMed ID: 1574822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Surgery for gallbladder cancer: a population-based analysis.
Coburn NG; Cleary SP; Tan JC; Law CH
J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Sep; 207(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 18722943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in clinically node-negative penile cancer patients.
Ramkumar A; Seshadri RA; Narayanaswamy K; Balasubramanian S
Int J Urol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):383-6; discussion 386-7. PubMed ID: 19226357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A 10-year retrospective audit of penile cancer management in the UK.
Mistry T; Jones RW; Dannatt E; Prasad KK; Stockdale AD
BJU Int; 2007 Dec; 100(6):1277-81. PubMed ID: 17850372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial.
Benedetti Panici P; Basile S; Maneschi F; Alberto Lissoni A; Signorelli M; Scambia G; Angioli R; Tateo S; Mangili G; Katsaros D; Garozzo G; Campagnutta E; Donadello N; Greggi S; Melpignano M; Raspagliesi F; Ragni N; Cormio G; Grassi R; Franchi M; Giannarelli D; Fossati R; Torri V; Amoroso M; Crocè C; Mangioni C
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Dec; 100(23):1707-16. PubMed ID: 19033573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
