119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20565165)
1. Meta-analysis that conceals more than it reveals: comment on Storm et al. (2010).
Hyman R
Psychol Bull; 2010 Jul; 136(4):486-90. PubMed ID: 20565165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A meta-analysis with nothing to hide: reply to Hyman (2010).
Storm L; Tressoldi PE; Risio LD
Psychol Bull; 2010 Jul; 136(4):491-4. PubMed ID: 20565166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Bayes factor meta-analysis of recent extrasensory perception experiments: comment on Storm, Tressoldi, and Di Risio (2010).
Rouder JN; Morey RD; Province JM
Psychol Bull; 2013 Jan; 139(1):241-7. PubMed ID: 23294092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing the Storm et al. (2010) meta-analysis using Bayesian and frequentist approaches: reply to Rouder et al. (2013).
Storm L; Tressoldi PE; Utts J
Psychol Bull; 2013 Jan; 139(1):248-254. PubMed ID: 23294093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-analysis of free-response studies, 1992-2008: assessing the noise reduction model in parapsychology.
Storm L; Tressoldi PE; Di Risio L
Psychol Bull; 2010 Jul; 136(4):471-85. PubMed ID: 20565164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correction to storm, Tressoldi, and di Risio (2010).
Psychol Bull; 2015 Mar; 141(2):403. PubMed ID: 25730257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does psi exist? Comments on Milton and Wiseman's (1999) meta-analysis of ganzfeld research.
Storm L; Ertel S
Psychol Bull; 2001 May; 127(3):424-33; discussion 434-8. PubMed ID: 11393304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses.
Brok J; Thorlund K; Gluud C; Wetterslev J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):763-9. PubMed ID: 18411040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic reviews of medical evidence: the use of meta-analysis in obstetrics and gynecology.
Peipert JF; Bracken MB
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):628-33. PubMed ID: 9083325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Meta-analysis: when and how.
Imperiale TF
Hepatology; 1999 Jun; 29(6 Suppl):26S-31S. PubMed ID: 10386080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new and rapid scoring system to assess the scientific evidence from clinical trials.
Silber S
J Interv Cardiol; 2006 Dec; 19(6):485-92. PubMed ID: 17107362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychic drift. Why most scientists do not believe in ESP and psi phenomena.
Shermer M
Sci Am; 2003 Feb; 288(2):31. PubMed ID: 12561455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Factorial design provides evidence to guide practice of anaesthesia.
Korttila K; Apfel CC
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Aug; 49(7):927-9. PubMed ID: 16045652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does Psi exist? Lack of replication of an anomalous process of information transfer.
Milton J; Wiseman R
Psychol Bull; 1999 Jul; 125(4):387-91. PubMed ID: 10414223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treating blunt aortic injuries with endografts: pros and cons of a meta-analysis.
Starnes BW
Semin Vasc Surg; 2010 Sep; 23(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 20826295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The meaning and suitability of various effect sizes for structured Rater x Ratee designs.
Hönekopp J; Becker BJ; Oswald FL
Psychol Methods; 2006 Mar; 11(1):72-86. PubMed ID: 16594768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Meta-analysis as a tool for evidence-based practice: an example using the Rice meta-analysis of smoking cessation interventions.
Leonard EE; Wynd CA
Appl Nurs Res; 2008 Feb; 21(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 18226762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interpreting epidemiological evidence: how meta-analysis and causal inference methods are related.
Weed DL
Int J Epidemiol; 2000 Jun; 29(3):387-90. PubMed ID: 10869307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
