These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20565179)

  • 21. Attention and sensory gain control: a peripheral visual process?
    Handy TC; Khoe W
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1936-49. PubMed ID: 16356330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pushing around the locus of selection: evidence for the flexible-selection hypothesis.
    Vogel EK; Woodman GF; Luck SJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1907-22. PubMed ID: 16356328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Attentional resources and pop-out detection in search displays.
    Schubö A; Schröger E; Meinecke C; Müller HJ
    Neuroreport; 2007 Oct; 18(15):1589-93. PubMed ID: 17885607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Distinct neurophysiological mechanisms mediate mixing costs and switch costs.
    Wylie GR; Murray MM; Javitt DC; Foxe JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 18476759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Electrophysiological indices of spatial attention during global/local processing in good and poor phonological decoders.
    Matthews AJ; Martin FH
    Brain Lang; 2009 Dec; 111(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 19828188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Are voluntary switches corrected repetitions?
    Vandamme K; Szmalec A; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Nov; 47(6):1176-81. PubMed ID: 20456659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Representational economy, not processing speed, determines preferred processing strategy of visual patterns.
    Lachmann T; van Leeuwen C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 20381784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Tomatoes and apples or red and green lines: are age-related interference effects based on competition among concepts or percepts?
    Titz C; Behrendt J; Hasselhorn M
    Exp Aging Res; 2010 Jul; 36(3):346-58. PubMed ID: 20544452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using advance information in dynamic cognitive control: an ERP study of task-switching.
    Swainson R; Jackson SR; Jackson GM
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 16626653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: a review and new evidence from event-related potentials.
    Correa A; Lupiáñez J; Madrid E; Tudela P
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1076(1):116-28. PubMed ID: 16516173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction.
    Corral MJ; Escera C
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1535-9. PubMed ID: 18797312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Verbal self-instructions in task switching: a compensatory tool for action-control deficits in childhood and old age?
    Kray J; Eber J; Karbach J
    Dev Sci; 2008 Mar; 11(2):223-36. PubMed ID: 18333979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Error positivity is related to attentional control of task switching.
    Tanaka H
    Neuroreport; 2009 May; 20(8):820-4. PubMed ID: 19384255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fractionating the cognitive control required to bring about a change in task: a dense-sensor event-related potential study.
    Astle DE; Jackson GM; Swainson R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 18275333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. N2pc and attentional capture by colour and orientation-singletons in pure and mixed visual search tasks.
    Rodríguez Holguín S; Doallo S; Vizoso C; Cadaveira F
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 19409424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Electrophysiological evidence for independent consolidation of multiple targets.
    Kihara K; Kawahara J; Takeda Y
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1493-6. PubMed ID: 18797304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impulsive responding and the sustained attention to response task.
    Helton WS
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2009 Jan; 31(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18608658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Distinguishing between inhibitory and episodic processing accounts of switch-cost asymmetries.
    Wong J; Leboe JP
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):8-23. PubMed ID: 19271811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attention allocation in the dual-task paradigm as measured through behavioral and psychophysiological responses.
    Karatekin C; Couperus JW; Marcus DJ
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Mar; 41(2):175-85. PubMed ID: 15032983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.