These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20565207)

  • 1. The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion.
    Dhooge E; Hartsuiker RJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):878-91. PubMed ID: 20565207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distractor modality can turn semantic interference into semantic facilitation in the picture-word interference task: implications for theories of lexical access in speech production.
    Hantsch A; Jescheniak JD; Schriefers H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1443-53. PubMed ID: 19857015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is there semantic interference in delayed naming?
    Mädebach A; Oppermann F; Hantsch A; Curda C; Jescheniak JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):522-38. PubMed ID: 21299323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Independent distractor frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in picture-word interference: fMRI evidence for post-lexical and lexical accounts according to distractor type.
    de Zubicaray GI; Miozzo M; Johnson K; Schiller NO; McMahon KL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Feb; 24(2):482-95. PubMed ID: 21955165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selective attention and distractor frequency in naming performance: comment on Dhooge and Hartsuiker (2010).
    Roelofs A; Piai V; Schriefers H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):1032-8. PubMed ID: 21728468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A late locus of the distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Dhooge E; Baene WD; Hartsuiker RJ
    Brain Lang; 2013 Mar; 124(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 23400118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. My word! Interference from reading object names implies a role for competition during picture name retrieval.
    Vitkovitch M; Cooper E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1229-40. PubMed ID: 22390174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; van der Meij R
    Brain Res; 2012 Apr; 1450():87-101. PubMed ID: 22424790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age of acquisition, word frequency, and picture-word interference.
    Catling JC; Dent K; Johnston RA; Balding R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1304-17. PubMed ID: 20127547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis.
    Janssen N; Schirm W; Mahon BZ; Caramazza A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):249-56. PubMed ID: 18194068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters.
    Miles JD; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19801619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The distractor frequency effect in a delayed picture-word interference task: further evidence for a late locus of distractor exclusion.
    Dhooge E; Hartsuiker RJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 21327356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm.
    Mahon BZ; Costa A; Peterson R; Vargas KA; Caramazza A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):503-35. PubMed ID: 17470003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is lexical access autonomous? Evidence from combining overlapping tasks with recording event-related brain potentials.
    Rabovsky M; Alvarez CJ; Hohlfeld A; Sommer W
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1222():156-65. PubMed ID: 18585684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The representation of homophones: evidence from the distractor-frequency effect.
    Miozzo M; Caramazza A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1360-71. PubMed ID: 16393051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ease of processing constrains the activation flow in the conceptual-lexical system during speech planning.
    Mädebach A; Jescheniak JD; Oppermann F; Schriefers H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 May; 37(3):649-60. PubMed ID: 21341927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Locus of semantic interference in picture naming: Evidence from dual-task performance.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; Schriefers H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):147-65. PubMed ID: 23895445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tracing attention and the activation flow of spoken word planning using eye movements.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):353-68. PubMed ID: 18315411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age of acquisition, not word frequency affects object recognition: evidence from the effects of visual degradation.
    Catling JC; Dent K; Williamson S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 18599003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distractor variation on auditory selective attention.
    Tong Y; Melara RD
    Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 1166():110-23. PubMed ID: 17669371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.