BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20565208)

  • 1. Does word length affect speech onset latencies when producing single words?
    Damian MF; Bowers JS; Stadthagen-Gonzalez H; Spalek K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):892-905. PubMed ID: 20565208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phonological facilitation from pictures in a word association task: evidence for routine cascaded processing in spoken word production.
    Humphreys KR; Boyd CH; Watter S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Dec; 63(12):2289-96. PubMed ID: 20737355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Which words are activated during bilingual word production?
    Colomé A; Miozzo M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 20053047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Naming pseudowords in Spanish: effects of syllable frequency.
    Carreiras M; Perea M
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):393-400. PubMed ID: 15172555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age of acquisition persists as the main factor in picture naming when cumulative word frequency and frequency trajectory are controlled.
    Pérez MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jan; 60(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 17162506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The specific-word frequency effect: implications for the representation of homophones in speech production.
    Caramazza A; Costa A; Miozzo M; Bi Y
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Nov; 27(6):1430-50. PubMed ID: 11713878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scope of lexical access in spoken sentence production: implications for the conceptual-syntactic interface.
    Allum PH; Wheeldon L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1240-55. PubMed ID: 19686018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Planning and articulation in incremental word production: syllable-frequency effects in English.
    Cholin J; Dell GS; Levelt WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):109-22. PubMed ID: 21244111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oscillatory brain responses in spoken word production reflect lexical frequency and sentential constraint.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; Maris E
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():146-56. PubMed ID: 24291513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is there semantic interference in delayed naming?
    Mädebach A; Oppermann F; Hantsch A; Curda C; Jescheniak JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):522-38. PubMed ID: 21299323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semantic relatedness among objects promotes the activation of multiple phonological codes during object naming.
    Oppermann F; Jescheniak JD; Schriefers H; Gorges F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):356-70. PubMed ID: 19557668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The time course of name retrieval during multiple-object naming: evidence from extrafoveal-on-foveal effects.
    Malpass D; Meyer AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):523-37. PubMed ID: 20192547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved vocabulary production after naming therapy in aphasia: can gains in picture naming generalize to connected speech?
    Conroy P; Sage K; Ralph ML
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2009; 44(6):1036-62. PubMed ID: 19294554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeating words in sentences: effects of sentence structure.
    Wheeldon LR; Smith MC; Apperly IA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1051-64. PubMed ID: 21517223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age of acquisition, word frequency, and picture-word interference.
    Catling JC; Dent K; Johnston RA; Balding R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1304-17. PubMed ID: 20127547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the facilitatory effects of cognate words in bilingual speech production.
    Costa A; Santesteban M; Caño A
    Brain Lang; 2005 Jul; 94(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 15896387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The segment as the minimal planning unit in speech production: evidence based on absolute response latencies.
    Kawamoto AH; Liu Q; Lee RJ; Grebe PR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(12):2340-59. PubMed ID: 24863574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual word recognition during reading is followed by subvocal articulation.
    Eiter BM; Inhoff AW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):457-70. PubMed ID: 20192542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The first steps in word learning are easier when the shoes fit: comparing monolingual and bilingual infants.
    Mattock K; Polka L; Rvachew S; Krehm M
    Dev Sci; 2010 Jan; 13(1):229-43. PubMed ID: 20121879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring the activation of semantic and phonological codes during speech planning with event-related brain potentials.
    Jescheniak JD; Schriefers H; Garrett MF; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Aug; 14(6):951-64. PubMed ID: 12191461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.