These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20565214)

  • 1. Resolving task rule incongruence during task switching by competitor rule suppression.
    Meiran N; Hsieh S; Dimov E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):992-1002. PubMed ID: 20565214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shifting development in mid-childhood: the influence of between-task interference.
    Cragg L; Nation K
    Dev Psychol; 2009 Sep; 45(5):1465-79. PubMed ID: 19702406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cue-type manipulation dissociates two types of task set inhibition: backward inhibition and competitor rule suppression.
    Regev S; Meiran N
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):625-39. PubMed ID: 25822920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological correlates of task conflicts in task-switching.
    Hsieh S; Liu H
    Brain Res; 2008 Apr; 1203():116-25. PubMed ID: 18314093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Task-set switching deficits in early-stage Huntington's disease: implications for basal ganglia function.
    Aron AR; Watkins L; Sahakian BJ; Monsell S; Barker RA; Robbins TW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jul; 15(5):629-42. PubMed ID: 12965037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inhibition in language switching: what is inhibited when switching between languages in naming tasks?
    Philipp AM; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1187-95. PubMed ID: 19686014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strategy selection and use during classification skill acquisition.
    Bourne LE; Raymond WD; Healy AF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):500-14. PubMed ID: 20192545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The nature of switch cost: task set configuration or carry-over effect?
    Hsieh S; Liu LC
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 15653291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus-based priming of task choice during voluntary task switching.
    Arrington CM; Weaver SM; Pauker RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1060-7. PubMed ID: 20565222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preparing or executing the wrong task: the influence on switch effects.
    Desmet C; Fias W; Brass M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1172-84. PubMed ID: 22375558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cue response dissociates inhibitory processes: task identity information is related to backward inhibition but not to competitor rule suppression.
    Regev S; Meiran N
    Psychol Res; 2017 Jan; 81(1):168-181. PubMed ID: 26762518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Heightened conflict in cue-target translation increases backward inhibition in set switching.
    Grange JA; Houghton G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1003-9. PubMed ID: 20565215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of training and transfer on global/local processing.
    Dulaney CL; Marks W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jun; 125(2):203-20. PubMed ID: 16914108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A dissociation in attentional control: evidence from methamphetamine dependence.
    Salo R; Nordahl TE; Moore C; Waters C; Natsuaki Y; Galloway GP; Kile S; Sullivan EV
    Biol Psychiatry; 2005 Feb; 57(3):310-3. PubMed ID: 15691533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive control of response preparedness in task switching.
    Steinhauser M; Hübner R; Druey M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1826-35. PubMed ID: 19428414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Instruction-based task-rule congruency effects.
    Liefooghe B; Wenke D; De Houwer J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1325-35. PubMed ID: 22545614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stop being neutral: Simon takes control!
    Aisenberg D; Henik A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 20839134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional switching in the sequential flanker task: age, location, and time course effects.
    Li KZ; Dupuis K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):416-27. PubMed ID: 17869202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task alternation cost without task alternation: measuring intentionality.
    Yehene E; Meiran N; Soroker N
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(13):1858-69. PubMed ID: 16168729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The lateralized readiness potential and P300 of stimulus-set switching.
    Hsieh S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jun; 60(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 16157405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.