These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20565915)

  • 21. A genetic and immunological comparison of tick-resistance in beef cattle following artificial infestation with Rhipicephalus ticks.
    Marima JK; Nel CL; Marufu MC; Jonsson NN; Dube B; Dzama K
    Exp Appl Acarol; 2020 Apr; 80(4):569-590. PubMed ID: 32185559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus: distinct acute phase proteins vary during infestations according to the genetic composition of the bovine hosts, Bos taurus and Bos indicus.
    Carvalho WA; Bechara GH; Moré DD; Ferreira BR; da Silva JS; de Miranda Santos IK
    Exp Parasitol; 2008 Apr; 118(4):587-91. PubMed ID: 18171576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Variation at the Calpain 3 gene is associated with meat tenderness in zebu and composite breeds of cattle.
    Barendse W; Harrison BE; Bunch RJ; Thomas MB
    BMC Genet; 2008 Jul; 9():41. PubMed ID: 18590576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mapping of quantitative trait loci controlling tick [Riphicephalus (Boophilus) microplus] resistance on bovine chromosomes 5, 7 and 14.
    Gasparin G; Miyata M; Coutinho LL; Martinez ML; Teodoro RL; Furlong J; Machado MA; Silva MV; Sonstegard TS; Regitano LC
    Anim Genet; 2007 Oct; 38(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 17894560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Distinct immune response profile during rhipicephalus (boophilus) microplus infestations of guzerat dairy herd according to the maternal lineage ancestry (mitochondrial DNA).
    de Araújo FF; Ronda JB; Bittar ER; Venturini GC; Garcia GC; Martins-Filho OA; Silva Araújo MS; Figueiredo Bittar JF
    Vet Parasitol; 2019 Sep; 273():36-44. PubMed ID: 31442891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the differential regulation of T and B-lymphocyte subsets in the skin and lymph nodes amongst three cattle breeds as potential mediators of immune-resistance to Rhipicephalus microplus.
    Robbertse L; Richards SA; Clift SJ; Barnard AC; Leisewitz A; Crafford JE; Maritz-Olivier C
    Ticks Tick Borne Dis; 2018 May; 9(4):976-987. PubMed ID: 29622516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Activation of several key components of the epidermal differentiation pathway in cattle following infestation with the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.
    Kongsuwan K; Josh P; Colgrave ML; Bagnall NH; Gough J; Burns B; Pearson R
    Int J Parasitol; 2010 Mar; 40(4):499-507. PubMed ID: 19909754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of field tick infestation on N'Dama, Zebu and N'Dama x Zebu crossbred cattle.
    Mattioli RC; Bah M; Faye J; Kora S; Cassama M
    Vet Parasitol; 1993 Mar; 47(1-2):139-48. PubMed ID: 8493760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Analyses of reaction norms reveal new chromosome regions associated with tick resistance in cattle.
    Mota RR; Silva FF; Lopes PS; Tempelman RJ; Sollero BP; Aguilar I; Cardoso FF
    Animal; 2018 Feb; 12(2):205-214. PubMed ID: 28701235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tick-susceptible Bos taurus cattle display an increased cellular response at the site of larval Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus attachment, compared with tick-resistant Bos indicus cattle.
    Piper EK; Jackson LA; Bielefeldt-Ohmann H; Gondro C; Lew-Tabor AE; Jonsson NN
    Int J Parasitol; 2010 Mar; 40(4):431-41. PubMed ID: 19852965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microarray analysis of tick-infested skin in resistant and susceptible cattle confirms the role of inflammatory pathways in immune activation and larval rejection.
    Carvalho WA; Domingues R; de Azevedo Prata MC; da Silva MV; de Oliveira GC; Guimarães SE; Machado MA
    Vet Parasitol; 2014 Sep; 205(1-2):307-17. PubMed ID: 25108850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Class I antigens of the bovine major histocompatibility system and resistance to the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) assessed in three different seasons.
    Stear MJ; Nicholas FW; Brown SC; Holroyd RG
    Vet Parasitol; 1989 Jun; 31(3-4):303-15. PubMed ID: 2763449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Expressed sequenced tags profiling of resistant and susceptible Gyr x Holstein cattle infested with the tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.
    Nascimento CS; Machado MA; Guimarães SE; Martins MF; Peixoto JO; Furlong J; Prata MC; Verneque RS; Teodoro RL; Lopes PS
    Genet Mol Res; 2011 Nov; 10(4):3803-16. PubMed ID: 22095475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dermal mast cell counts in F2 Holstein x Gir crossbred cattle artificially infested with the tick Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae).
    Engracia Filho JR; Bechara GH; Teodoro RL
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2006 Oct; 1081():476-8. PubMed ID: 17135554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Breed-associated resistance to tick infestation in Bos indicus and their crosses with Bos taurus.
    Wambura PN; Gwakisa PS; Silayo RS; Rugaimukamu EA
    Vet Parasitol; 1998 May; 77(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 9652384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Host resistance to ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) in different breeds of cattle at Bako, Ethiopia.
    Ali M; de Castro JJ
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 1993 Nov; 25(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 8109054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Expression of immune response genes in peripheral blood of cattle infested with Rhipicephalus microplus.
    Domingues R; Wohlres-Viana S; Reis DR; Teixeira HC; Ferreira AP; Guimarães SE; Prata MC; Furlong J; Verneque RS; Machado MA
    Genet Mol Res; 2014 May; 13(2):4013-21. PubMed ID: 24938612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Genotype by environment interaction for tick resistance of Hereford and Braford beef cattle using reaction norm models.
    Mota RR; Tempelman RJ; Lopes PS; Aguilar I; Silva FF; Cardoso FF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():3. PubMed ID: 26767704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A countrywide molecular survey leads to a seminal identification of the invasive cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in Cameroon, a decade after it was reported in Cote d'Ivoire.
    Silatsa BA; Kuiate JR; Njiokou F; Simo G; Feussom JK; Tunrayo A; Amzati GS; Bett B; Bishop R; Githaka N; Opiyo SO; Djikeng A; Pelle R
    Ticks Tick Borne Dis; 2019 Apr; 10(3):585-593. PubMed ID: 30765191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Do rainfall and tick burden affect the efficacy of pour-on formulations against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus?
    Beltrán Zapa DM; Monteiro Couto LF; Heller LM; de Assis Cavalcante AS; Nicaretta JE; Cruvinel LB; de Melo Júnior RD; Ferreira LL; Azeredo Bastos TS; Edesio Soares V; Sousa Mello IA; Zanetti Lopes WD
    Prev Vet Med; 2020 Apr; 177():104950. PubMed ID: 32203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.