These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20567368)

  • 1. Dependence of 3-D optical transfer functions on the pinhole radius in a fluorescent confocal optical microscope.
    Kimura S; Munakata C
    Appl Opt; 1990 Jul; 29(20):3007-11. PubMed ID: 20567368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional optical transfer function for the fluorescent scanning optical microscope with a slit.
    Kimura S; Munakata C
    Appl Opt; 1990 Mar; 29(7):1004-7. PubMed ID: 20562949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confocal scanning optical microscope using single-mode fiber for signal detection.
    Kimura S; Wilson T
    Appl Opt; 1991 Jun; 30(16):2143-50. PubMed ID: 20700189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pixel reassignment in image scanning microscopy: a re-evaluation.
    Sheppard CJR; Castello M; Tortarolo G; Deguchi T; Koho SV; Vicidomini G; Diaspro A
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2020 Jan; 37(1):154-162. PubMed ID: 32118893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Edge enhancement for in-phase focal modulation microscope.
    Si K; Gong W; Chen N; Sheppard CJ
    Appl Opt; 2009 Nov; 48(32):6290-5. PubMed ID: 19904330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhanced three-dimensional reconstruction from confocal scanning microscope images. II. Depth discrimination versus signal-to-noise ratio in partially confocal images.
    Conchello JA; Kim JJ; Hansen EW
    Appl Opt; 1994 Jun; 33(17):3740-50. PubMed ID: 20885766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative comparison of background rejection, signal-to-noise ratio, and resolution in confocal and full-field laser scanning microscopes.
    Sandison DR; Piston DW; Williams RM; Webb WW
    Appl Opt; 1995 Jul; 34(19):3576-88. PubMed ID: 21052173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Depth resolution of the fluorescent confocal scanning optical microscope.
    Kimura S; Munakata C
    Appl Opt; 1990 Feb; 29(4):489-94. PubMed ID: 20556135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single-pinhole confocal imaging of sub-resolution sparse objects using experimental point spread function and image restoration.
    Diaspro A; Annunziata S; Robello M
    Microsc Res Tech; 2000 Dec; 51(5):464-8. PubMed ID: 11074617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Theoretical analysis of a rotating-disk partially confocal scanning microscope.
    Conchello JA; Lichtman JW
    Appl Opt; 1994 Feb; 33(4):585-96. PubMed ID: 20862053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Confocal slit divided-aperture microscope: applications in ear research.
    Koester CJ; Khanna SM; Rosskothen HD; Tackaberry RB; Ulfendahl M
    Appl Opt; 1994 Feb; 33(4):702-8. PubMed ID: 20862067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Resolution and optical sectioning in the confocal microscope.
    Wilson T
    J Microsc; 2011 Nov; 244(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 22004276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optical equivalence between phase-diversity homodyne detection microscopy and confocal microscopy.
    Kimura S
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2012 Oct; 29(10):2130-3. PubMed ID: 23201660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhanced 3-D reconstruction from confocal scanning microscope images. 1: Deterministic and maximum likelihood reconstructions.
    Conchello JA; Hansen EW
    Appl Opt; 1990 Sep; 29(26):3795-804. PubMed ID: 20567486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of axial pinhole displacement in confocal microscopes.
    Kimura S; Wilson T
    Appl Opt; 1993 May; 32(13):2257-61. PubMed ID: 20820376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SPLIT-PIN software enabling confocal and super-resolution imaging with a virtually closed pinhole.
    Di Franco E; Costantino A; Cerutti E; D'Amico M; Privitera AP; Bianchini P; Vicidomini G; Gulisano M; Diaspro A; Lanzanò L
    Sci Rep; 2023 Feb; 13(1):2741. PubMed ID: 36792719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional optical sectioning by scanning confocal electron microscopy with a stage-scanning system.
    Hashimoto A; Shimojo M; Mitsuishi K; Takeguchi M
    Microsc Microanal; 2010 Jun; 16(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 20350339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Confocal laser scanning microscopy for image cytometry].
    Takamatsu T; Fujita S
    Nihon Rinsho; 1992 Oct; 50(10):2542-6. PubMed ID: 1447828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improvement in resolution by nearly confocal microscopy.
    Cox IJ; Sheppard CJ; Wilson T
    Appl Opt; 1982 Mar; 21(5):778-81. PubMed ID: 20372538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behavior of the point-spread function in photon-limited confocal microscopy.
    Tapang G; Saloma C
    Appl Opt; 2002 Mar; 41(8):1534-40. PubMed ID: 11928754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.