BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20568276)

  • 61. L-GATOR: Genetic Association Testing for a Longitudinally Measured Quantitative Trait in Samples with Related Individuals.
    Wu X; McPeek MS
    Am J Hum Genet; 2018 Apr; 102(4):574-591. PubMed ID: 29625022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Admixture analysis in relation to pedigree studies of introgression in a minority British cattle breed: the Lincoln Red.
    Bray TC; Hall SJ; Bruford MW
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2014 Feb; 131(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 25099785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. QTLRel: an R package for genome-wide association studies in which relatedness is a concern.
    Cheng R; Abney M; Palmer AA; Skol AD
    BMC Genet; 2011 Jul; 12():66. PubMed ID: 21794153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Post-GWAS: where next? More samples, more SNPs or more biology?
    Marjoram P; Zubair A; Nuzhdin SV
    Heredity (Edinb); 2014 Jan; 112(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 23759726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Phenotype forecasting with SNPs data through gene-based Bayesian networks.
    Malovini A; Nuzzo A; Ferrazzi F; Puca AA; Bellazzi R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Feb; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S7. PubMed ID: 19208195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Statistical modelling of growth using a mixed model with orthogonal polynomials.
    Suchocki T; Szyda J
    J Appl Genet; 2011 Feb; 52(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 21110149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Meta-analysis of haplotype-association studies: comparison of methods and empirical evaluation of the literature.
    Bagos PG
    BMC Genet; 2011 Jan; 12():8. PubMed ID: 21247440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Comparison of genome-wide association methods in analyses of admixed populations with complex familial relationships.
    Kadri NK; Guldbrandtsen B; Sørensen P; Sahana G
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e88926. PubMed ID: 24662750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. A method for genome-wide genealogy estimation for thousands of samples.
    Speidel L; Forest M; Shi S; Myers SR
    Nat Genet; 2019 Sep; 51(9):1321-1329. PubMed ID: 31477933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Genome-wide gene-environment interactions on quantitative traits using family data.
    Sitlani CM; Dupuis J; Rice KM; Sun F; Pitsillides AN; Cupples LA; Psaty BM
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Jul; 24(7):1022-8. PubMed ID: 26626313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Population structure in genetic studies: Confounding factors and mixed models.
    Sul JH; Martin LS; Eskin E
    PLoS Genet; 2018 Dec; 14(12):e1007309. PubMed ID: 30589851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. A simulation study of permutation, bootstrap, and gene dropping for assessing statistical significance in the case of unequal relatedness.
    Cheng R; Palmer AA
    Genetics; 2013 Mar; 193(3):1015-8. PubMed ID: 23267053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Logistic Bayesian LASSO for detecting association combining family and case-control data.
    Zhou X; Wang M; Zhang H; Stewart WCL; Lin S
    BMC Proc; 2018; 12(Suppl 9):54. PubMed ID: 30263052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Above and beyond state-of-the-art approaches to investigate sequence data: summary of methods and results from the population-based association group at the Genetic Analysis Workshop 19.
    Lorenzo Bermejo J
    BMC Genet; 2016 Feb; 17 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):2. PubMed ID: 26866664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. An approximate Bayesian significance test for genomic evaluations.
    Wittenburg D; Liebscher V
    Biom J; 2018 Nov; 60(6):1096-1109. PubMed ID: 30101421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Sequential recruitment of study participants may inflate genetic heritability estimates.
    Noce D; Gögele M; Schwienbacher C; Caprioli G; De Grandi A; Foco L; Platzgummer S; Pramstaller PP; Pattaro C
    Hum Genet; 2017 Jun; 136(6):743-757. PubMed ID: 28374192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Bayesian variable selection for high dimensional predictors and self-reported outcomes.
    Gu X; Tadesse MG; Foulkes AS; Ma Y; Balasubramanian R
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Sep; 20(1):212. PubMed ID: 32894123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Different models and single-nucleotide polymorphisms signal the simulated weak gene-gene interaction for a quantitative trait using haplotype-based and mixed models testing.
    Kovac IP; Dubé MP
    BMC Proc; 2009 Dec; 3 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):S77. PubMed ID: 20018072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Complex system approaches to genetic analysis Bayesian approaches.
    Wilson MA; Baurley JW; Thomas DC; Conti DV
    Adv Genet; 2010; 72():47-71. PubMed ID: 21029848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. On the choice of prior density for the Bayesian analysis of pedigree structure.
    Almudevar A; LaCombe J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2012 Mar; 81(2):131-43. PubMed ID: 22200649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.