These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20568717)

  • 1. System selectivity cube: a 3D visualization tool for comparing the selectivity of gas chromatography, supercritical-fluid chromatography, high-pressure liquid chromatography, and micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography systems.
    Johnson AR; Vitha MF; Urness T; Marrinan T
    Anal Chem; 2010 Jul; 82(14):6251-8. PubMed ID: 20568717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chromatographic selectivity triangles.
    Johnson AR; Vitha MF
    J Chromatogr A; 2011 Jan; 1218(4):556-86. PubMed ID: 21067756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying orthogonal and similar reversed phase liquid chromatography stationary phases using the system selectivity cube and the hydrophobic subtraction model.
    Johnson AR; Johnson CM; Stoll DR; Vitha MF
    J Chromatogr A; 2012 Aug; 1249():62-82. PubMed ID: 22738817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparisons of the separations of some neutral analytes by LC, MEKC, and CEC.
    Taylor RB; Vorarat S; Reid RG; Boyle SP; Moody RR
    J Capill Electrophor Microchip Technol; 1999; 6(3-4):131-6. PubMed ID: 11315153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of ester and amide-containing surfactant headgroups on selectivity in micellar electrokinetic chromatography.
    Trone MD; Khaledi MG
    Electrophoresis; 2000 Jul; 21(12):2390-6. PubMed ID: 10939450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monomeric and polymeric anionic gemini surfactants and mixed surfactant systems in micellar electrokinetic chromatography. Part II: characterization of chemical selectivity using two linear solvation energy relationship models.
    Akbay C; Agbaria RA; Warner IM
    Electrophoresis; 2005 Jan; 26(2):426-45. PubMed ID: 15657890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Micellar selectivity triangle for classification of chemical selectivity in electrokinetic chromatography.
    Fu C; Khaledi MG
    J Chromatogr A; 2009 Mar; 1216(10):1891-900. PubMed ID: 19181322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selectivity of single, mixed, and modified pseudostationary phases in electrokinetic chromatography.
    Fuguet E; Ràfols C; Bosch E; Abraham MH; Rosés M
    Electrophoresis; 2006 May; 27(10):1900-14. PubMed ID: 16607607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Towards a general approach for the impurity profiling of drugs by micellar electrokinetic chromatography.
    Hilhorst MJ; Derksen AF; Steringa M; Somsen GW; de Jong GJ
    Electrophoresis; 2001 Apr; 22(7):1337-44. PubMed ID: 11379956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A unified classification of stationary phases for packed column supercritical fluid chromatography.
    West C; Lesellier E
    J Chromatogr A; 2008 May; 1191(1-2):21-39. PubMed ID: 18384800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linear solvation energy relationships of anionic dimeric surfactants in micellar electrokinetic chromatography I. Effect of the length of a hydrophobic spacer.
    Van Biesen G; Bottaro CS
    J Chromatogr A; 2007 Jul; 1157(1-2):437-45. PubMed ID: 17482628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of lignans using micellar electrokinetic chromatography.
    Kuo CH; Lee SS; Chang HY; Sun SW
    Electrophoresis; 2003 Mar; 24(6):1047-53. PubMed ID: 12658694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical evaluation of linear solvation energy relationship models used to characterize chemical selectivity in micellar electrokinetic chromatography.
    Trone MD; Khaledi MG
    J Chromatogr A; 2000 Jul; 886(1-2):245-57. PubMed ID: 10950292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of stationary phase solvation on shape selectivity and retention in reversed-phase liquid chromatography.
    Limsavarn L; Dorsey JG
    J Chromatogr A; 2006 Jan; 1102(1-2):143-53. PubMed ID: 16289120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multidimensional capillary array liquid chromatography and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization tandem mass spectrometry for high-throughput proteomic analysis.
    Liu C; Zhang X
    J Chromatogr A; 2007 Jan; 1139(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 17126347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Offline coupling of high-speed counter-current chromatography and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry generates a two-dimensional plot of toxaphene components.
    Kapp T; Vetter W
    J Chromatogr A; 2009 Nov; 1216(47):8391-7. PubMed ID: 19822318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Novel alkyl-modified anionic siloxanes as pseudostationary phases for electrokinetic chromatography: II. Selectivity studied by linear solvation energy relationships.
    Peterson DS; Palmer CP
    Electrophoresis; 2001 Oct; 22(16):3562-6. PubMed ID: 11669542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polymeric sulfated surfactants with varied hydrocarbon tail: II. Chemical selectivity in micellar electrokinetic chromatography using linear solvation energy relationships study.
    Akbay C; Shamsi SA
    Electrophoresis; 2004 Feb; 25(4-5):635-44. PubMed ID: 14981691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The chemical interpretation and practice of linear solvation energy relationships in chromatography.
    Vitha M; Carr PW
    J Chromatogr A; 2006 Sep; 1126(1-2):143-94. PubMed ID: 16889784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of cyclodextrin modified micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography and reversed-phase liquid chromatography for separation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
    Jinno K; Sawada Y
    J Capillary Electrophor; 1995; 2(4):151-5. PubMed ID: 9384768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.