566 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20568924)
1. Analysis of load sharing on uncovertebral and facet joints at the C5-6 level with implantation of the Bryan, Prestige LP, or ProDisc-C cervical disc prosthesis: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
Kang H; Park P; La Marca F; Hollister SJ; Lin CY
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E9. PubMed ID: 20568924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy: a biomechanical study.
Aryan HE; Newman CB; Lu DC; Hu SS; Tay BK; Bradford DS; Puttlitz CM; Ames CP
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19342931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy disc.
Lazaro BC; Yucesoy K; Yuksel KZ; Kowalczyk I; Rabin D; Fink M; Duggal N
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E6. PubMed ID: 20568921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of spacer diameter of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
Shih SL; Chen CS; Lin HM; Huang LY; Liu CL; Huang CH; Cheng CK
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):E140-9. PubMed ID: 22744611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of noncontiguous cervical disc arthroplasty and noncontiguous cervical discectomy and fusion in the treatment of noncontinuous cervical degenerative disc disease: a finite element analysis.
Sun X; Sun S; Zhang T; Kong C; Wang W; Lu S
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Jan; 15(1):36. PubMed ID: 32005193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of in vivo kinematics of 3 different cervical devices: Bryan disc, ProDisc-C, and Prestige LP disc.
Kowalczyk I; Lazaro BC; Fink M; Rabin D; Duggal N
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Dec; 15(6):630-5. PubMed ID: 21905776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Best NM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.
Park JJ; Quirno M; Cunningham MR; Schwarzkopf R; Bendo JA; Spivak JM; Goldstein JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):E285-9. PubMed ID: 20354472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effects of novel angled cervical disc replacement on facet joint stress].
Bai C; Zhang W; Ling W; Tian Z; Dang X; Wang K
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 26(4):390-5. PubMed ID: 22568314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The facet joint loading profile of a cervical intervertebral disc replacement incorporating a novel saddle-shaped articulation.
Stieber JR; Quirno M; Kang M; Valdevit A; Errico TJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Oct; 24(7):432-6. PubMed ID: 21336178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical consideration of prosthesis selection in hybrid surgery for bi-level cervical disc degenerative diseases.
Mo Z; Li Q; Jia Z; Yang J; Wong DW; Fan Y
Eur Spine J; 2017 Apr; 26(4):1181-1190. PubMed ID: 27652678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty.
Galbusera F; Bellini CM; Zweig T; Ferguson S; Raimondi MT; Lamartina C; Brayda-Bruno M; Fornari M
Eur Spine J; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1635-50. PubMed ID: 18946684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Facet joint contact pressure is not significantly affected by ProDisc cervical disc arthroplasty in sagittal bending: a single-level cadaveric study.
Bauman JA; Jaumard NV; Guarino BB; Weisshaar CL; Lipschutz DE; Welch WC; Winkelstein BA
Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):949-59. PubMed ID: 22975463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion.
Chang UK; Kim DH; Lee MC; Willenberg R; Kim SH; Lim J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Jul; 7(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 17633485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical analysis of disc pressure and facet contact force after simulated two-level cervical surgeries (fusion and arthroplasty) and hybrid surgery.
Park J; Shin JJ; Lim J
World Neurosurg; 2014 Dec; 82(6):1388-93. PubMed ID: 24937596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new cervical artificial disc prosthesis based on physiological curvature of end plate: a finite element analysis.
Yu CC; Liu P; Huang DG; Jiang YH; Feng H; Hao DJ
Spine J; 2016 Nov; 16(11):1384-1391. PubMed ID: 27345748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unique biomechanical signatures of Bryan, Prodisc C, and Prestige LP cervical disc replacements: a finite element modelling study.
Choi H; Purushothaman Y; Baisden J; Yoganandan N
Eur Spine J; 2020 Nov; 29(11):2631-2639. PubMed ID: 31606816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ProDisc cervical arthroplasty does not alter facet joint contact pressure during lateral bending or axial torsion.
Jaumard NV; Bauman JA; Guarino BB; Gokhale AJ; Lipschutz DE; Weisshaar CL; Welch WC; Winkelstein BA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jan; 38(2):E84-93. PubMed ID: 23132537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
