566 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20568924)
21. Biomechanics of a posture-controlling cervical artificial disc: mechanical, in vitro, and finite-element analysis.
Crawford NR; Arnett JD; Butters JA; Ferrara LA; Kulkarni N; Goel VK; Duggal N
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E11. PubMed ID: 20568917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of an auxiliary facet system on intervertebral discs and adjacent facet joints.
Charles YP; Lima LV; Persohn S; Rouch P; Steib JP; Skalli W
Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1293-300. PubMed ID: 23988459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Uncovertebral hypertrophy is a significant risk factor for the occurrence of heterotopic ossification after cervical disc replacement: survivorship analysis of Bryan disc for single-level cervical arthroplasty.
Chung SB; Muradov JM; Lee SH; Eoh W; Kim ES
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2012 Jun; 154(6):1017-22. PubMed ID: 22421919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Range of motion change after cervical arthroplasty with ProDisc-C and prestige artificial discs compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Chang UK; Kim DH; Lee MC; Willenberg R; Kim SH; Lim J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Jul; 7(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 17633486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of follower load on the range of motion, facet joint force, and intradiscal pressure of the cervical spine: a finite element study.
Cai XY; YuChi CX; Du CF; Mo ZJ
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2020 Aug; 58(8):1695-1705. PubMed ID: 32462554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc.
Dooris AP; Goel VK; Grosland NM; Gilbertson LG; Wilder DG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Mar; 26(6):E122-9. PubMed ID: 11246394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cervical facet force analysis after disc replacement versus fusion.
Patel VV; Wuthrich ZR; McGilvray KC; Lafleur MC; Lindley EM; Sun D; Puttlitz CM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 May; 44():52-58. PubMed ID: 28340364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biomechanical analysis of the lumbar spine on facet joint force and intradiscal pressure--a finite element study.
Kuo CS; Hu HT; Lin RM; Huang KY; Lin PC; Zhong ZC; Hseih ML
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2010 Jul; 11():151. PubMed ID: 20602783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of the geometry of a ball-and-socket intervertebral prosthesis at the cervical spine: a finite element study.
Rousseau MA; Bonnet X; Skalli W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):E10-4. PubMed ID: 18165735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomechanical evaluation of a metal-on-metal cervical intervertebral disc prosthesis.
Colle KO; Butler JB; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Theodore N; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2013 Nov; 13(11):1640-9. PubMed ID: 24094992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cervical disc replacement C5-6.
Bonkowski J; Avadhani A; Manu A; Rajasekaran S
Eur Spine J; 2010 Feb; 19(2):345-6. PubMed ID: 20130928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Investigation of impact loading rate effects on the ligamentous cervical spinal load-partitioning using finite element model of functional spinal unit C2-C3.
Mustafy T; El-Rich M; Mesfar W; Moglo K
J Biomech; 2014 Sep; 47(12):2891-903. PubMed ID: 25129167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of an artificial disc on lumbar spine biomechanics: a probabilistic finite element study.
Rohlmann A; Mann A; Zander T; Bergmann G
Eur Spine J; 2009 Jan; 18(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 19043744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of modified techniques in Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty.
Xu JX; Zhang YZ; Shen Y; Ding WY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):1012-7. PubMed ID: 19404176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical and radiological results following cervical arthroplasty.
Yoon DH; Yi S; Shin HC; Kim KN; Kim SH
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2006 Sep; 148(9):943-50. PubMed ID: 16791434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Finite element modeling of kinematic and load transmission alterations due to cervical intervertebral disc replacement.
Womack W; Leahy PD; Patel VV; Puttlitz CM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Aug; 36(17):E1126-33. PubMed ID: 21785298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of the effects of different artificial discs on hybrid surgery: A finite element analysis.
Jiang W; Zhao F; Rahman WU; Dong T; Yang G
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2024 Jan; 238(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 38102922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative Finite Element Modeling Study of Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis Versus Cervical Arthroplasty With Bryan Disc or Prodisc C.
Choi H; Purushothaman Y; Baisden JL; Rajasekaran D; Jebaseelan D; Yoganandan N
Mil Med; 2021 Jan; 186(Suppl 1):737-744. PubMed ID: 33499493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on spine kinematics and facet joint loads in flexion and extension: a finite element analysis.
Schmidt H; Galbusera F; Rohlmann A; Zander T; Wilke HJ
Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S663-74. PubMed ID: 20361341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
