289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20568924)
41. Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.
Zander T; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19121822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Radiologically documented adjacent-segment degeneration after cervical arthroplasty: characteristics and review of cases.
Yi S; Lee DY; Ahn PG; Kim KN; Yoon DH; Shin HC
Surg Neurol; 2009 Oct; 72(4):325-9; discussion 329. PubMed ID: 19665192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Spinal kinematics and facet load transmission after total disc replacement.
Takigawa T; Espinoza Orías AA; An HS; Gohgi S; Udayakumar RK; Sugisaki K; Natarajan RN; Wimmer MA; Inoue N
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Oct; 35(22):E1160-6. PubMed ID: 20881657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Finite element modeling of the cervical spine: role of intervertebral disc under axial and eccentric loads.
Kumaresan S; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA; Maiman DJ
Med Eng Phys; 1999 Dec; 21(10):689-700. PubMed ID: 10717549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Load sharing and stabilization effects of anterior cervical devices.
Cheng BC; Burns P; Pirris S; Welch WC
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Dec; 22(8):571-7. PubMed ID: 19956031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Difference in occurrence of heterotopic ossification according to prosthesis type in the cervical artificial disc replacement.
Yi S; Kim KN; Yang MS; Yang JW; Kim H; Ha Y; Yoon DH; Shin HC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jul; 35(16):1556-61. PubMed ID: 20581764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Use of the finite element method to study the mechanism of spinal cord injury without radiological abnormality in the cervical spine.
Imajo Y; Hiiragi I; Kato Y; Taguchi T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):E83-7. PubMed ID: 19139658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Reduction in segmental flexibility because of disc degeneration is accompanied by higher changes in facet loads than changes in disc pressure: a poroelastic C5-C6 finite element investigation.
Hussain M; Natarajan RN; An HS; Andersson GB
Spine J; 2010 Dec; 10(12):1069-77. PubMed ID: 21094468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Interaction between finite helical axes and facet joint forces under combined loading.
Schmidt H; Heuer F; Wilke HJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Dec; 33(25):2741-8. PubMed ID: 19050579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
Rohlmann A; Burra NK; Zander T; Bergmann G
Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1223-31. PubMed ID: 17206401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Biomechanics of the C5-C6 spinal unit before and after placement of a disc prosthesis.
Galbusera F; Fantigrossi A; Raimondi MT; Sassi M; Fornari M; Assietti R
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2006 Nov; 5(4):253-61. PubMed ID: 16514519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. In vivo kinematics of two types of ball-and-socket cervical disc replacements in the sagittal plane: cranial versus caudal geometric center.
Rousseau MA; Cottin P; Levante S; Nogier A; Lazennec JY; Skalli W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):E6-9. PubMed ID: 18165739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Insertion of the artificial disc replacement: a cadaver study comparing the conventional surgical technique and the use of a navigation system.
Rauschmann MA; Thalgott J; Fogarty M; Nichlos M; Kleinszig G; Knap M; Kafchitsas K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):1110-5. PubMed ID: 19404182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Range of motion and orientation of the lumbar facet joints in vivo.
Kozanek M; Wang S; Passias PG; Xia Q; Li G; Bono CM; Wood KB; Li G
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(19):E689-96. PubMed ID: 19730201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The effect of different design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty on the range of motion, facet joint forces and instantaneous center of rotation of a L4-5 segment.
Schmidt H; Midderhoff S; Adkins K; Wilke HJ
Eur Spine J; 2009 Nov; 18(11):1695-1705. PubMed ID: 19763638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Structural modification and biomechanical analysis of lumbar disc prosthesis: A finite element study.
Ke H; Guo Y; Zhang X; Yin L; Nie W; Zhao Y; Zhao B; Zhang K; Wen Y; Ji B; Zhang M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2024 Jun; 116():106266. PubMed ID: 38821035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Finite element analysis of the cervical spine: a material property sensitivity study.
Kumaresan S; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1999 Jan; 14(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 10619089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Re: Comparison of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Bartels RH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(16):1740. PubMed ID: 19770618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
