These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

515 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20568934)

  • 21. Early results and review of the literature of a novel hybrid surgical technique combining cervical arthrodesis and disc arthroplasty for treating multilevel degenerative disc disease: opposite or complementary techniques?
    Barbagallo GM; Assietti R; Corbino L; Olindo G; Foti PV; Russo V; Albanese V
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Jun; 18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):29-39. PubMed ID: 19415346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cervical disc arthroplasty compared with fusion in a workers' compensation population.
    Steinmetz MP; Patel R; Traynelis V; Resnick DK; Anderson PA
    Neurosurgery; 2008 Oct; 63(4):741-7; discussion 747. PubMed ID: 18981885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Lumbar disc arthroplasty with Maverick disc versus stand-alone interbody fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption trial.
    Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Dryer RF; Peloza JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):E1600-11. PubMed ID: 21415812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cervical disc arthroplasty compared with arthrodesis for the treatment of myelopathy. Surgical technique.
    Buchowski JM; Anderson PA; Sekhon L; Riew KD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Oct; 91 Suppl 2():223-32. PubMed ID: 19805586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty in patients older than 60 years of age: a prospective study of the ProDisc prosthesis with 2-year minimum follow-up period.
    Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Nanieva R; Fenk-Mayer A; Husted DS; Shah RV; Emerson JW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Feb; 4(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 16506473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patient selection for lumbar arthroplasty and arthrodesis: the effect of revision surgery in a controlled, multicenter, randomized study.
    Geisler FH; Guyer RD; Blumenthal SL; McAfee PC; Cappuccino A; Bitan F; Regan JJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2008 Jan; 8(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 18173341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of the three United States Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical arthroplasty trials.
    Upadhyaya CD; Wu JC; Trost G; Haid RW; Traynelis VC; Tay B; Coric D; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Mar; 16(3):216-28. PubMed ID: 22195608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of Fusion and Arthroplasty for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease in Active Duty Service Members Performed at an Overseas Military Treatment Facility: A 2-Year Retrospective Analysis.
    Dewar C; Ravindra VM; Woodle S; Scanlon M; Shields M; Yokoi H; Meister M; Porensky P; Bossert S; Ikeda DS
    Mil Med; 2023 Nov; 188(11-12):e3454-e3462. PubMed ID: 37489817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adjacent-level cervical ossification after Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
    Garrido BJ; Wilhite J; Nakano M; Crawford C; Baldus C; Riew KD; Sasso RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jul; 93(13):1185-9. PubMed ID: 21776570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Occupational Impact of Multilevel Cervical Disease Treated With Hybrid Cervical Disc Arthroplasty in Active Duty Military Population.
    Cleveland A; Herzog J; Caram P
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2016; 25(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 27518296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Adjacent segment motion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus Prodisc-c cervical total disk arthroplasty: analysis from a randomized, controlled trial.
    Kelly MP; Mok JM; Frisch RF; Tay BK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jul; 36(15):1171-9. PubMed ID: 21217449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Impact of Worker's Compensation Claims on Outcomes and Costs Following an Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.
    Tabaraee E; Ahn J; Bohl DD; Elboghdady IM; Aboushaala K; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jun; 40(12):948-53. PubMed ID: 26070041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy disc.
    Lazaro BC; Yucesoy K; Yuksel KZ; Kowalczyk I; Rabin D; Fink M; Duggal N
    Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E6. PubMed ID: 20568921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cervical arthroplasty after previous surgery: results of treating 24 discs in 15 patients.
    Sekhon LH; Sears W; Duggal N
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Nov; 3(5):335-41. PubMed ID: 16302626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Lumbar spine arthroplasty: early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion.
    Zigler JE; Burd TA; Vialle EN; Sachs BL; Rashbaum RF; Ohnmeiss DD
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Aug; 16(4):352-61. PubMed ID: 12902951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Effect of Workers' Compensation Status on Outcomes of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Comparative, Observational Study.
    Gornet MF; Schranck FW; Copay AG; Kopjar B
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 98(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 26791029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Upper thoracic spine arthroplasty via the anterior approach.
    Keachie K; Shahlaie K; Muizelaar JP
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Aug; 13(2):240-5. PubMed ID: 20672961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical outcomes with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption study.
    Vaccaro A; Beutler W; Peppelman W; Marzluff JM; Highsmith J; Mugglin A; DeMuth G; Gudipally M; Baker KJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Dec; 38(26):2227-39. PubMed ID: 24335629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Factors affecting reoperations after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion within and outside of a Federal Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical disc replacement trial.
    Singh K; Phillips FM; Park DK; Pelton MA; An HS; Goldberg EJ
    Spine J; 2012 May; 12(5):372-8. PubMed ID: 22425784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.