371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20568977)
1. Heart rate variability and heat sensation during CT coronary angiography: Low-osmolar versus iso-osmolar contrast media.
Svensson A; Ripsweden J; Rück A; Aspelin P; Cederlund K; Brismar BT
Acta Radiol; 2010 Sep; 51(7):722-6. PubMed ID: 20568977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Coronary stent evaluation with coronary computed tomographic angiography: comparison between low-osmolar, high-iodine concentration iomeprol-400 and iso-osmolar, lower-iodine concentration iodixanol-320.
Andreini D; Pontone G; Mushtaq S; Bartorelli AL; Conte E; Bertella E; Baggiano A; Annoni A; Formenti A; Ballerini G; Agostoni P; Fiorentini C; Pepi M
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 24582042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multicenter comparison of high concentration contrast agent iomeprol-400 with iso-osmolar iodixanol-320: contrast enhancement and heart rate variation in coronary dual-source computed tomographic angiography.
Becker CR; Vanzulli A; Fink C; de Faveri D; Fedeli S; Dore R; Biondetti P; Kuettner A; Krix M; Ascenti G
Invest Radiol; 2011 Jul; 46(7):457-64. PubMed ID: 21577124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pain in femoral arteriography. A double-blind, randomized, clinical study comparing safety and efficacy of the iso-osmolar iodixanol 270 mgI/ml and the low-osmolar iomeprol 300 mgI/ml in 9 European centers.
Manke C; Marcus C; Page A; Puey J; Batakis O; Fog A
Acta Radiol; 2003 Nov; 44(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 14616202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the effect of low- and iso-osmolar contrast agents on heart rate during chest CT angiography: results of a prospective randomized multicenter study.
Chartrand-Lefebvre C; White CS; Bhalla S; Mayo-Smith WW; Prenovault J; Vydareny KH; Soto JA; Ozkan OS; Chughtai AR; Soulez G
Radiology; 2011 Mar; 258(3):930-7. PubMed ID: 21212367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of a low-osmolar contrast medium, iopamidol, and an iso-osmolar contrast medium, iodixanol, in MDCT coronary angiography.
Ozbulbul NI; Yurdakul M; Tola M
Coron Artery Dis; 2010 Nov; 21(7):414-9. PubMed ID: 20671550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of non-ionic iodinated contrast media on patient heart rate and pressures during intra-cardiac or intra-arterial injection.
Schmid I; Didier D; Pfammatter T; Garachemani A; Fleisch M; Kirchin MA; Meier B
Int J Cardiol; 2007 Jun; 118(3):389-96. PubMed ID: 17376548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Accuracy, Image Quality, and Patient Comfort for Coronary CT Angiography Performed Using Iso-Osmolar versus Low-Osmolar Iodinated Contrast: A Prospective International Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
Nakazato R; Arsanjani R; Shalev A; Leipsic JA; Gransar H; Lin FY; Gomez M; Berman DS; Min JK
Acad Radiol; 2016 Jun; 23(6):743-51. PubMed ID: 27178781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Influence of Contrast Agent's Osmolarity on Iodine Delivery Protocol in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Comparison Between Iso-Osmolar Iodixanol-320 and Low-Osmolar Iomeprol-370.
Yang X; Huang W; Liu W; Zhu Y; Xu Y; Yang G; Tang L; Zhu X
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 28708716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative effect of iso-osmolar versus low-osmolar contrast media on vascular attenuation, image quality, and heart rate changes in coronary CT angiography: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Alhelaly MM; Abdelhakim AM; Ellotf H; Khaled A; Soliman AM; Attia MM
Clin Imaging; 2020 May; 61():69-79. PubMed ID: 31982704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Iodixanol versus Iopromide at Coronary CT Angiography: Lumen Opacification and Effect on Heart Rhythm-the Randomized IsoCOR Trial.
Lubbers MM; Kock M; Niezen A; Galema T; Kofflard M; Bruning T; Kooij HS; van Valen H; Dijkshoorn M; Booij R; Padmos A; Vogels A; Budde RPJ; Nieman K
Radiology; 2018 Jan; 286(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 28809582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of renal vasoconstriction in vivo after intra-arterial administration of the isosmotic contrast medium iodixanol compared to the low-osmotic contrast medium iopamidol.
Treitl M; Rupprecht H; Wirth S; Korner M; Reiser M; Rieger J
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2009 May; 24(5):1478-85. PubMed ID: 19033249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-Term Adverse Effects of Low-Osmolar Compared With Iso-Osmolar Contrast Media After Coronary Angiography.
Wang YC; Tang A; Chang D; Lu CQ; Zhang SJ; Ju S
Am J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 118(7):985-90. PubMed ID: 27521223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High incidence of nephropathy in neurosurgical patients after intra-arterial administration of low-osmolar and iso-osmolar contrast media.
Serafin Z; Karolkiewicz M; Gruszka M; Strózecki P; Lasek W; Odrowaz-Sypniewska G; Manitius J; Beuth W
Acta Radiol; 2011 May; 52(4):422-9. PubMed ID: 21498279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of patient comfort between iodixanol and iopamidol in contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis: a randomized trial.
Weiland FL; Marti-Bonmati L; Lim L; Becker HC
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):715-24. PubMed ID: 24060817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk of contrast-medium-induced nephropathy in high-risk patients undergoing MDCT--a pooled analysis of two randomized trials.
Thomsen HS; Morcos SK
Eur Radiol; 2009 Apr; 19(4):891-7. PubMed ID: 19002467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nephrotoxicity of iso-osmolar iodixanol compared with nonionic low-osmolar contrast media: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Heinrich MC; Häberle L; Müller V; Bautz W; Uder M
Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):68-86. PubMed ID: 19092091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of iopamidol-370 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing multidetector-row computed tomography.
Sahani DV; Soulez G; Chen KM; Lepanto L; Xu JR; Nelson RC; Grazioli L; Vanzulli A; Heiken JP;
Invest Radiol; 2007 Dec; 42(12):856-61. PubMed ID: 18007158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The ACTIVE Trial: comparison of the effects on renal function of iomeprol-400 and iodixanol-320 in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing abdominal computed tomography.
Thomsen HS; Morcos SK; Erley CM; Grazioli L; Bonomo L; Ni Z; Romano L;
Invest Radiol; 2008 Mar; 43(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 18301313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of iopamidol-370 versus iodixanol-320 on coronary contrast, branch depiction, and heart rate variability in dual-source coronary MDCT angiography.
Christensen JD; Meyer LT; Hurwitz LM; Boll DT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Sep; 197(3):W445-51. PubMed ID: 21862771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
