These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20569179)
1. A two-layer model of natural stimuli estimated with score matching. Köster U; Hyvärinen A Neural Comput; 2010 Sep; 22(9):2308-33. PubMed ID: 20569179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Temporal and spatiotemporal coherence in simple-cell responses: a generative model of natural image sequences. Hurri J; Hyvärinen A Network; 2003 Aug; 14(3):527-51. PubMed ID: 12938770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quadratic forms in natural images. Hashimoto W Network; 2003 Nov; 14(4):765-88. PubMed ID: 14653502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A model for learning topographically organized parts-based representations of objects in visual cortex: topographic nonnegative matrix factorization. Hosoda K; Watanabe M; Wersing H; Körner E; Tsujino H; Tamura H; Fujita I Neural Comput; 2009 Sep; 21(9):2605-33. PubMed ID: 19548799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Olshausen BA; Field DJ Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6583):607-9. PubMed ID: 8637596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How are complex cell properties adapted to the statistics of natural stimuli? Körding KP; Kayser C; Einhäuser W; König P J Neurophysiol; 2004 Jan; 91(1):206-12. PubMed ID: 12904330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of localized oriented receptive fields by learning a translation-invariant code for natural images. Rao RP; Ballard DH Network; 1998 May; 9(2):219-34. PubMed ID: 9861987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatial structure of complex cell receptive fields measured with natural images. Touryan J; Felsen G; Dan Y Neuron; 2005 Mar; 45(5):781-91. PubMed ID: 15748852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The extraction of features and disparities from images by a model based on the neurological organisation of the visual system. Harvey RJ Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(11):1297-306. PubMed ID: 18417184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatial vs temporal continuity in view invariant visual object recognition learning. Perry G; Rolls ET; Stringer SM Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(23):3994-4006. PubMed ID: 16996556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complex cell pooling and the statistics of natural images. Hyvärinen A; Köster U Network; 2007 Jun; 18(2):81-100. PubMed ID: 17852755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Learning intermediate-level representations of form and motion from natural movies. Cadieu CF; Olshausen BA Neural Comput; 2012 Apr; 24(4):827-66. PubMed ID: 22168556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial scene representations formed by self-organizing learning in a hippocampal extension of the ventral visual system. Rolls ET; Tromans JM; Stringer SM Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 28(10):2116-27. PubMed ID: 19046392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neurons with two sites of synaptic integration learn invariant representations. Körding KP; König P Neural Comput; 2001 Dec; 13(12):2823-49. PubMed ID: 11705412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Synaptic adaptation and sustained generation of waves in a model of turtle visual cortex. Freudenburg ZV; Ghosh BK; Ulinski PS IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 May; 56(5):1277-86. PubMed ID: 19150779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nonlinear and extra-classical receptive field properties and the statistics of natural scenes. Zetzsche C; Röhrbein F Network; 2001 Aug; 12(3):331-50. PubMed ID: 11563533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]