These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20569964)

  • 1. Towards quantification of uncertainty in predicting water quality failures in integrated catchment model studies.
    Schellart AN; Tait SJ; Ashley RM
    Water Res; 2010 Jul; 44(13):3893-904. PubMed ID: 20569964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Receiving water quality assessment: comparison between simplified and detailed integrated urban modelling approaches.
    Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(10):2301-12. PubMed ID: 21076216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wet weather water quality modelling of a Portuguese urban catchment: difficulties and benefits.
    David LM; Matos RS
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(3):131-40. PubMed ID: 11902464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sediment and pollutant load modelling using an integrated urban drainage modelling toolbox: an application of City Drain.
    Rodríguez JP; Achleitner S; Möderl M; Rauch W; Maksimović C; McIntyre N; Díaz-Granados MA; Rodríguez MS
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(9):2273-82. PubMed ID: 20418624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the integrated urban water quality model complexity through identifiability analysis.
    Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 20732705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of different uncertainty techniques in urban stormwater quantity and quality modelling.
    Dotto CB; Mannina G; Kleidorfer M; Vezzaro L; Henrichs M; McCarthy DT; Freni G; Rauch W; Deletic A
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2545-58. PubMed ID: 22402270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: the effect of acceptability threshold in the GLUE methodology.
    Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Res; 2008 Apr; 42(8-9):2061-72. PubMed ID: 18207487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantification and relative comparison of different types of uncertainties in sewer water quality modeling.
    Willems P
    Water Res; 2008 Jul; 42(13):3539-51. PubMed ID: 18554682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of input data uncertainties on urban stormwater model parameters.
    Kleidorfer M; Deletic A; Fletcher TD; Rauch W
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(6):1545-54. PubMed ID: 19759457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of parameter uncertainty of a flow and quality stormwater model.
    Dotto CB; Deletic A; Fletcher TD
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(3):717-25. PubMed ID: 19657167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of river ecosystem models for Flemish watercourses: case studies in the Zwalm river basin.
    Goethals P; Dedecker A; Raes N; Adriaenssens V; Gabriels W; De Pauw N
    Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(1):71-86. PubMed ID: 15952431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A parsimonious dynamic model for river water quality assessment.
    Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(3):607-18. PubMed ID: 20150696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: the influence of likelihood measure formulation in the GLUE methodology.
    Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Dec; 408(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 19819524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of rainfall time resolution for urban water quality modelling.
    Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(9):2381-90. PubMed ID: 20418636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling potential herbicide loss to surface waters on the Swiss plateau.
    Siber R; Stamm C; Reichert P
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Oct; 91(1):290-302. PubMed ID: 19783355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identifiability and uncertainty analysis of the river water quality model no. 1 (RWQM1).
    Reichert P; Vanrolleghem P
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):329-38. PubMed ID: 11385865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of morphological parameters on water quality variables of a regulated lowland river.
    Lindenschmidt KE; Poser K; Rode M
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(6):187-93. PubMed ID: 16304951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of new developments on river water quality from an integrated system modelling perspective.
    Fu G; Butler D; Khu ST
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Feb; 407(4):1257-67. PubMed ID: 19036407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Water quality modeling to determine minimum instream flow for fish survival in tidal rivers.
    Liu WC; Liu SY; Hsu MH; Kuo AY
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Sep; 76(4):293-308. PubMed ID: 15927355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integrated modelling under uncertainty in watershed-level assessment and management.
    Ham JH; Yoon CG; Jung KW; Jang JH
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):31-9. PubMed ID: 17978430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.