BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20570096)

  • 1. Large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty using the Durom acetabular component at minimum 1-year interval.
    Illgen RL; Heiner JP; Squire MW; Conrad DN
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Sep; 25(6 Suppl):26-30. PubMed ID: 20570096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Disappointing short-term results with the DePuy ASR XL metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
    Bernthal NM; Celestre PC; Stavrakis AI; Ludington JC; Oakes DA
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Apr; 27(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 22000575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Femoral revision in hip resurfacing compared with large-bearing metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.
    Garrett SJ; Bolland BJ; Yates PJ; Gardner EM; Latham JM
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1214-8. PubMed ID: 21414749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Durom large diameter head acetabular component: early results with a large-diameter metal-on-metal bearing.
    Berton C; Girard J; Krantz N; Migaud H
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Feb; 92(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 20130309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early failure of articular surface replacement XL total hip arthroplasty.
    Steele GD; Fehring TK; Odum SM; Dennos AC; Nadaud MC
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6 Suppl):14-8. PubMed ID: 21550764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Large-diameter modular metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: incidence of revision for adverse reaction to metallic debris.
    Barrett WP; Kindsfater KA; Lesko JP
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):976-83.e1. PubMed ID: 22425300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimum 5-year results of modular metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
    Kindsfater KA; Sychterz Terefenko CJ; Gruen TA; Sherman CM
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Apr; 27(4):545-50. PubMed ID: 21908166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with large diameter metal-on-metal heads: short-term survivorship of 8059 hips from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
    Mokka J; Mäkelä KT; Virolainen P; Remes V; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A
    Scand J Surg; 2013; 102(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 23820688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Residual groin pain at a minimum of two years after metal-on-metal THA with a twenty-eight-millimeter femoral head, THA with a large-diameter femoral head, and hip resurfacing.
    Lavigne M; Laffosse JM; Ganapathi M; Girard J; Vendittoli P
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 May; 93 Suppl 2():93-8. PubMed ID: 21543697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acetabular revisions using trabecular metal cups and augments.
    Van Kleunen JP; Lee GC; Lementowski PW; Nelson CL; Garino JP
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):64-8. PubMed ID: 19339154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A retrieval analysis of explanted Durom metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties.
    Matthies AK; Henckel J; Skinner JA; Hart AJ
    Hip Int; 2011; 21(6):724-31. PubMed ID: 22144337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographic evaluation of midterm failure rates following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
    Rylander LS; Milbrandt JC; Wallace AB; Allan DG
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6):897-902. PubMed ID: 21131164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revision total hip arthroplasty for ceramic head fracture: a long-term follow-up.
    Sharma V; Ranawat AS; Rasquinha VJ; Weiskopf J; Howard H; Ranawat CS
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Apr; 25(3):342-7. PubMed ID: 20347713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative long-term survivorship of uncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Kremers HM; Howard JL; Loechler Y; Schleck CD; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ; Cabanela ME; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT; Lewallen DG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e82. PubMed ID: 22717834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Failure of larger-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty resulting from anterior iliopsoas impingement.
    Browne JA; Polga DJ; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT; Cabanela ME
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6):978.e5-8. PubMed ID: 21130601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of cementless acetabular component with a hook and iliac flanges in revision arthroplasty for massive acetabular defect.
    Kim KC; Ha YC; Kang BJ; Lee YK; Ji HM; Koo KH
    J Orthop Sci; 2012 Jan; 17(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 22094605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gender is a significant factor for failure of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
    Latteier MJ; Berend KR; Lombardi AV; Ajluni AF; Seng BE; Adams JB
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6 Suppl):19-23. PubMed ID: 21641761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Primary cementless hip arthroplasty with a titanium plasma sprayed prosthesis.
    Hozack WJ; Rothman RH; Eng K; Mesa J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Dec; (333):217-25. PubMed ID: 8981899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of structural bone graft with cementless acetabular cups in total hip arthroplasty.
    Dewal H; Chen F; Su E; Di Cesare PE
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Jan; 18(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 12555178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data.
    Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Porter ML; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 22628587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.