257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20570233)
1. Macular thickness interoperator and intraoperator reproducibility in healthy eyes using 7 optical coherence tomography instruments.
Pierro L; Giatsidis SM; Mantovani E; Gagliardi M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Aug; 150(2):199-204.e1. PubMed ID: 20570233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness reproducibility using seven different OCT instruments.
Pierro L; Gagliardi M; Iuliano L; Ambrosi A; Bandello F
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Aug; 53(9):5912-20. PubMed ID: 22871835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Macular thickness measurements in healthy eyes using six different optical coherence tomography instruments.
Wolf-Schnurrbusch UE; Ceklic L; Brinkmann CK; Iliev ME; Frey M; Rothenbuehler SP; Enzmann V; Wolf S
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jul; 50(7):3432-7. PubMed ID: 19234346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Normative data for macular thickness by high-definition spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (spectralis).
Grover S; Murthy RK; Brar VS; Chalam KV
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Aug; 148(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 19427616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproducibility of macular thickness measurement among five OCT instruments: effects of image resolution, image registration, and eye tracking.
Chin EK; Sedeek RW; Li Y; Beckett L; Redenbo E; Chandra K; Park SS
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2012; 43(2):97-108. PubMed ID: 22201525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of macular thickness measurements between time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography.
Leung CK; Cheung CY; Weinreb RN; Lee G; Lin D; Pang CP; Lam DS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Nov; 49(11):4893-7. PubMed ID: 18450592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of three different optical coherence tomography models for total macular thickness measurements in healthy controls.
Menke MN; Dabov S; Sturm V
Ophthalmologica; 2009; 223(6):352-6. PubMed ID: 19571601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of retinal thickness in normal eyes using Stratus and Spectralis optical coherence tomography.
Grover S; Murthy RK; Brar VS; Chalam KV
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 May; 51(5):2644-7. PubMed ID: 20007831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements in healthy subjects using spectralis optical coherence tomography.
Menke MN; Dabov S; Knecht P; Sturm V
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 147(3):467-72. PubMed ID: 19026403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intra and interoperator reproducibility of retinal nerve fibre and macular thickness measurements using Cirrus Fourier-domain OCT.
Garcia-Martin E; Pinilla I; Idoipe M; Fuertes I; Pueyo V
Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 89(1):e23-9. PubMed ID: 21106044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproducibility of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer and macular retinal thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography.
Hsu SY; Tung IC; Sheu MM; Tsai RK
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2006 Sep; 22(9):447-51. PubMed ID: 17000445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Normative data set identifying properties of the macula across age groups: integration of visual function and retinal structure with microperimetry and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
Sabates FN; Vincent RD; Koulen P; Sabates NR; Gallimore G
Retina; 2011; 31(7):1294-302. PubMed ID: 21358460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of retinal nerve fiber layer and macular thickness measurements in healthy Taiwanese individuals using optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT).
Hsu SY; Tsai RK
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18303381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Repeatability and reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements by optical coherence tomography in age-related macular degeneration.
Krebs I; Hagen S; Brannath W; Haas P; Womastek I; de Salvo G; Ansari-Shahrezaei S; Binder S
Ophthalmology; 2010 Aug; 117(8):1577-84. PubMed ID: 20557937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Macular thickness evaluation using the optical coherence tomography in normal Indian eyes.
Tewari HK; Wagh VB; Sony P; Venkatesh P; Singh R
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2004 Sep; 52(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 15510458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study of central corneal thickness measurement with slit-lamp optical coherence tomography and visante optical coherence tomography.
Li H; Leung CK; Wong L; Cheung CY; Pang CP; Weinreb RN; Lam DS
Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):796-801.e2. PubMed ID: 17916376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Macular thickness variations with sex, age, and axial length in healthy subjects: a spectral domain-optical coherence tomography study.
Song WK; Lee SC; Lee ES; Kim CY; Kim SS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Aug; 51(8):3913-8. PubMed ID: 20357206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Aligning scan locations from consecutive spectral-domain optical coherence tomography examinations: a comparison among different strategies.
Giani A; Pellegrini M; Invernizzi A; Cigada M; Staurenghi G
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Nov; 53(12):7637-43. PubMed ID: 23099494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of macular thickness measurements between time-domain and spectral-domain optical coherence tomographies in eyes with and without macular abnormalities.
Giammaria D; Ioni A; Bartoli B; Cofini V; Pellegrini G; Giannotti B
Retina; 2011 Apr; 31(4):707-16. PubMed ID: 21836402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproducibility of optical coherence tomography measurements in children.
Altemir I; Pueyo V; Elía N; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Oros D
Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Jan; 155(1):171-176.e1. PubMed ID: 22967864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
