These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The pregnant silence: Rust v. Sullivan, abortion rights, and publicly funded speech. Weeks AB North Carol Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 70(5):1623-68. PubMed ID: 16044600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. U.S. Supreme Court considers new Title X regulations. Fam Plann Perspect; 1991; 23(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 2029942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bound and gagged: America's family planning network. Dryfoos JG J Am Health Policy; 1992; 2(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 10116482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pregnancy counseling and abortion referral for patients in Federally funded family planning programs. Rosoff JI Fam Plann Perspect; 1976; 8(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 1253951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Celebrating the Bill of Rights in the year of Rust v. Sullivan. Murphy E Nurs Outlook; 1991; 39(5):238-9. PubMed ID: 1896319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Title X, the abortion debate, and the First Amendment. Shapiro AA Columbia Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 90(6):1737-78. PubMed ID: 15739274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion 'gag' rule. Notkin H West J Med; 1991 Aug; 155(2):191. PubMed ID: 1926860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Humane abortion services: a revolution in human rights and the delivery of a medical service. Burnhill MS Mt Sinai J Med; 1975; 42(5):431-8. PubMed ID: 1081193 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures. Forrest JD; Samara R Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(5):188-95. PubMed ID: 8886761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994. Sollom T; Gold RB; Saul R Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(4):166-73. PubMed ID: 8853282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Why Clinton blew his cool. Kramer M Time; 1994 Jan; 143(3):28. PubMed ID: 10131202 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. ANA voices opposition to 'gag rule'. Am Nurse; 1991; 23(7):10. PubMed ID: 1877788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Lost in a doctrinal wasteland: the exceptionalism of doctor-patient speech within the Rehnquist Court's First Amendment jurisprudence. Berg PE Health Matrix Clevel; 1998; 8(2):153-77. PubMed ID: 10182216 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Courts cloud ban on abortion counseling. Wagner L Mod Healthc; 1988 Mar; 18(10):20. PubMed ID: 10286301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Toward a First Amendment theory of doctor-patient discourse and the right to receive unbiased medical advice. Berg P Boston Univ Law Rev; 1994 Mar; 74(2):201-66. PubMed ID: 11659979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. State laws and the provision of family planning and abortion services in 1985. Sollom T; Donovan P Fam Plann Perspect; 1985; 17(6):262-6. PubMed ID: 3842666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Birth control and the private physician. Silver MA Fam Plann Perspect; 1972 Apr; 4(2):42-6. PubMed ID: 5052571 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical groups assert gag has not been lifted, ask Hill for outright repeal. Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Apr; (6):1, 3-4. PubMed ID: 12317222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]