These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20570620)

  • 1. Epistemic brokerage in the bio-property narrative: contributions to explaining opposition to transgenic technologies in agriculture.
    Herring RJ
    N Biotechnol; 2010 Nov; 27(5):614-22. PubMed ID: 20570620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The costly benefits of opposing agricultural biotechnology.
    Apel A
    N Biotechnol; 2010 Nov; 27(5):635-40. PubMed ID: 20472105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Poor crop management plagues Bt cotton experiment in India.
    Jayaraman KS
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Nov; 20(11):1069. PubMed ID: 12410241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. India dawdles over Bt-cotton.
    Jayaraman KS
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):590-1. PubMed ID: 12776134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Plant biotechnology in China.
    Huang J; Rozelle S; Pray C; Wang Q
    Science; 2002 Jan; 295(5555):674-6. PubMed ID: 11809972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Yield effects of genetically modified crops in developing countries.
    Qaim M; Zilberman D
    Science; 2003 Feb; 299(5608):900-2. PubMed ID: 12574633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Apomixis technology development-virgin births in farmers' fields?
    Spillane C; Curtis MD; Grossniklaus U
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jun; 22(6):687-91. PubMed ID: 15175691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Indian biotech sets a constitutional challenge.
    Choudhary B
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6908):667. PubMed ID: 12384673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experience from use of GMOs in Argentinian agriculture, economy and environment.
    Burachik M
    N Biotechnol; 2010 Nov; 27(5):588-92. PubMed ID: 20580682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of GMOs (genetically modified organisms): agricultural biotechnology or agricultural biopolitics?
    Nuti M; Felici C; Agnolucci M
    Riv Biol; 2007; 100(2):189-202. PubMed ID: 17987558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intellectual property in higher life forms: the patent system and controversial technologies.
    Merges RP
    MD Law Rev; 1988; 47(4):1051-75. PubMed ID: 16514761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why Bt cotton pays for small-scale producers in South Africa.
    Morse S; Bennett R; Ismael Y
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Apr; 22(4):379-80. PubMed ID: 15060543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Opposition to transgenic technologies: ideology, interests and collective action frames.
    Herring RJ
    Nat Rev Genet; 2008 Jun; 9(6):458-63. PubMed ID: 18487989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patenting life: biotechnology, intellectual property, and environmental ethics.
    Hettinger N
    Boston Coll Environ Aff Law Rev; 1995; 22(2):267-305. PubMed ID: 11656671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. European disarray on transgenic crops.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2009 Feb; 457(7232):946. PubMed ID: 19238685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of biotechnology in agriculture and the methods for the detection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in food.
    Motti C; Dainese E; Mascini M; Minunni M; De Santis P; Cozzani I
    Ital J Biochem; 2000; 49(3-4):52-6. PubMed ID: 11508058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Agriculture. Biotech crops good for farmers and environment, Academy finds.
    Stokstad E
    Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5976):295. PubMed ID: 20395485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Refuges in India and delayed resistance to Bt crops.
    Tabashnik B
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Apr; 23(4):414. PubMed ID: 15815660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops.
    Smyth S; McHughen A
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Apr; 6(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 18028290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benefits of genetically modified crops for the poor: household income, nutrition, and health.
    Qaim M
    N Biotechnol; 2010 Nov; 27(5):552-7. PubMed ID: 20643233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.