156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20570764)
1. Factorization method and its physical justification in frequency-difference electrical impedance tomography.
Harrach B; Seo JK; Woo EJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Nov; 29(11):1918-26. PubMed ID: 20570764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT.
Soleimani M; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S103-13. PubMed ID: 16636402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Direct reconstruction of tissue parameters from differential multifrequency EIT in vivo.
Mayer M; Brunner P; Merwa R; Smolle-Jüttner FM; Maier A; Scharfetter H
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S93-101. PubMed ID: 16636423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frequency-difference electrical impedance tomography (fdEIT): algorithm development and feasibility study.
Seo JK; Lee J; Kim SW; Zribi H; Woo EJ
Physiol Meas; 2008 Aug; 29(8):929-44. PubMed ID: 18603667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimation of anomaly location and size using electrical impedance tomography.
Kwon O; Yoon JR; Seo JK; Woo EJ; Cho YG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jan; 50(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 12617528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic electrical impedance imaging with the interacting multiple model scheme.
Kim KY; Kim BS; Kim MC; Kim S; Isaacson D; Newell JC
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S217-33. PubMed ID: 15798235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Induced current magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography.
Ozparlak L; Ider YZ
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S289-305. PubMed ID: 15798242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Frequency-difference EIT (fdEIT) using weighted difference and equivalent homogeneous admittivity: validation by simulation and tank experiment.
Jun SC; Kuen J; Lee J; Woo EJ; Holder D; Seo JK
Physiol Meas; 2009 Oct; 30(10):1087-99. PubMed ID: 19738319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of a multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography (mfEIT) system KHU Mark1: impedance spectroscopy and time-difference imaging.
Oh TI; Koo H; Lee KH; Kim SM; Lee J; Kim SW; Seo JK; Woo EJ
Physiol Meas; 2008 Mar; 29(3):295-307. PubMed ID: 18367806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Static imaging of the electrical impedance tomography on cylinder physical phantom.
Liu R; Fu F; You F; Shi X; Dong X
Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S1381-8. PubMed ID: 26405899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography: a topology optimization approach.
Mello LA; de Lima CR; Amato MB; Lima RG; Silva EC
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 55(2 Pt 1):531-40. PubMed ID: 18269988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography (EIT) of the adult human head: initial findings in brain tumours, arteriovenous malformations and chronic stroke, development of an analysis method and calibration.
Romsauerova A; McEwan A; Horesh L; Yerworth R; Bayford RH; Holder DS
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S147-61. PubMed ID: 16636407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrical impedance tomography problem with inaccurately known boundary and contact impedances.
Kolehmainen V; Lassas M; Ola P
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Oct; 27(10):1404-14. PubMed ID: 18815092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial resolution improvement of 3D EIT images by the shrinking sLORETA-FOCUSS algorithm.
Dong G; Liu H; Bayford RH; Yerworth R; Schimpf PH; Yan W
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S199-208. PubMed ID: 15798233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Error analysis of nonconstant admittivity for MR-based electric property imaging.
Seo JK; Kim MO; Lee J; Choi N; Woo EJ; Kim HJ; Kwon OI; Kim DH
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Feb; 31(2):430-7. PubMed ID: 21990329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrical conductivity images of biological tissue phantoms in MREIT.
Oh SH; Lee BI; Woo EJ; Lee SY; Kim TS; Kwon O; Seo JK
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S279-88. PubMed ID: 15798241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors limiting the application of electrical impedance tomography for identification of regional conductivity changes using scalp electrodes during epileptic seizures in humans.
Fabrizi L; Sparkes M; Horesh L; Perez-Juste Abascal JF; McEwan A; Bayford RH; Elwes R; Binnie CD; Holder DS
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S163-74. PubMed ID: 16636408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phase artefact reduction in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT).
Lee BI; Park C; Pyo HC; Kwon O; Woo EJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5277-88. PubMed ID: 17019038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reconstruction of the shape of conductivity spectra using differential multi-frequency magnetic induction tomography.
Brunner P; Merwa R; Missner A; Rosell J; Hollaus K; Scharfetter H
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S237-48. PubMed ID: 16636414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using the GRID to improve the computation speed of electrical impedance tomography (EIT) reconstruction algorithms.
Fritschy J; Horesh L; Holder DS; Bayford RH
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S209-15. PubMed ID: 15798234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
