143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2057313)
1. Further evidence for a time-independent shift of the focus of attention.
Kwak HW; Dagenbach D; Egeth H
Percept Psychophys; 1991 May; 49(5):473-80. PubMed ID: 2057313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of distance between objects and distance from the vertical axis on shape identity judgments.
Friedman A; Pilon DJ
Mem Cognit; 1994 Sep; 22(5):552-64. PubMed ID: 7968551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Parallel versus serial processing in visual search: further evidence from subadditive effects of visual quality.
Egeth H; Dagenbach D
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 May; 17(2):551-60. PubMed ID: 1830092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relative judgment seems to be the key: revisiting the Beck effect.
Kimchi R; Navon D
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Apr; 26(2):789-805. PubMed ID: 10811176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors limiting large-scale localisation.
Sterken Y; Toet A; Yap YL
Perception; 1994; 23(6):709-26. PubMed ID: 7845763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How serial is serial processing in vision?
Zohary E; Hochstein S
Perception; 1989; 18(2):191-200. PubMed ID: 2771604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is visual image segmentation a bottom-up or an interactive process?
Vecera SP; Farah MJ
Percept Psychophys; 1997 Nov; 59(8):1280-96. PubMed ID: 9401461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Violation of pure insertion during mental rotation is independent of stimulus type, task, and subjects' age.
Jansen-Osmann P; Heil M
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):280-7. PubMed ID: 16438923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stimulus segmentation in the visual search task.
Galera C; Lopes EJ; von Grünau M
Percept Psychophys; 2000 Apr; 62(3):505-16. PubMed ID: 10909241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Serial and parallel attentive visual searches: evidence from cumulative distribution functions of response times.
Sung K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1372-88. PubMed ID: 19045981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink?
Raymond JE; Shapiro KL; Arnell KM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Aug; 18(3):849-60. PubMed ID: 1500880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Context influence on the perception of figures as conditional upon perceptual organization strategies.
Stins JF; van Leeuwen C
Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jan; 53(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 8433904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vision outside the focus of attention.
Braun J; Sagi D
Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jul; 48(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 2377439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks.
Hübner R; Lehle C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 17311482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The processing of spatial frequency and orientation information.
Chua FK
Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jan; 47(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 2300428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Local processes in preattentive feature detection.
Bacon WF; Egeth HE
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):77-90. PubMed ID: 1826324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The neural processing fate of singleton target and nontarget stimuli.
Akyürek EG; Dinkelbach A; Schubö A
Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1307():115-33. PubMed ID: 19833112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Semantic processing of crowded stimuli?
Huckauf A; Knops A; Nuerk HC; Willmes K
Psychol Res; 2008 Nov; 72(6):648-56. PubMed ID: 18841386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual search for simple volumetric shapes.
Brown JM; Weisstein N; May JG
Percept Psychophys; 1992 Jan; 51(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 1549423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Orientation-invariant object recognition: evidence from repetition blindness.
Harris IM; Dux PE
Cognition; 2005 Feb; 95(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 15629474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
