289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20573166)
1. Fragrance contact allergy: a 4-year retrospective study.
Cuesta L; Silvestre JF; Toledo F; Lucas A; Pérez-Crespo M; Ballester I
Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Aug; 63(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 20573166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recommendation to include fragrance mix 2 and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral) in the European baseline patch test series.
Bruze M; Andersen KE; Goossens A; ;
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 18279149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sensitization to fragrances in Spain: A 5-year multicentre study (2011-2015).
Silvestre JF; Mercader P; González-Pérez R; Hervella-Garcés M; Sanz-Sánchez T; Córdoba S; Sánchez-Pérez J; Heras-Mendoza F; Giménez-Arnau AM; Gatica-Ortega ME; Pastor-NIeto MA; Zaragoza V; Carrascosa JM; García-Bravo B; Ruiz-González I; Borrego L; Sánchez-Pedreño P; de Frutos JO; Armario-Hita JC; García-Gavín J; Fernández-Redondo V
Contact Dermatitis; 2019 Feb; 80(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 30430587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Results of patch testing with fragrance mix 1, fragrance mix 2, and their ingredients, and Myroxylon pereirae and colophonium, over a 21-year period.
Nardelli A; Carbonez A; Drieghe J; Goossens A
Contact Dermatitis; 2013 May; 68(5):307-13. PubMed ID: 23601065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contact allergy to the 26 specific fragrance ingredients to be declared on cosmetic products in accordance with the EU cosmetics directive.
Heisterberg MV; Menné T; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Nov; 65(5):266-75. PubMed ID: 21943251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to the 26 EU-labelled fragrances.
van Oosten EJ; Schuttelaar ML; Coenraads PJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Oct; 61(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 19825093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix.
Frosch PJ; Pirker C; Rastogi SC; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Menné T; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):207-15. PubMed ID: 15859993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contact allergy to essential oils cannot always be predicted from allergy to fragrance markers in the baseline series.
Sabroe RA; Holden CR; Gawkrodger DJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2016 Apr; 74(4):236-41. PubMed ID: 26806578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frequency of and trends in fragrance allergy over a 15-year period.
Nardelli A; Carbonez A; Ottoy W; Drieghe J; Goossens A
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):134-41. PubMed ID: 18279150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trends of contact allergy to fragrance mix I and Myroxylon pereirae among Danish eczema patients tested between 1985 and 2007.
Thyssen JP; Carlsen BC; Menné T; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Oct; 59(4):238-44. PubMed ID: 18844700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fragrance mix II in the baseline series contributes significantly to detection of fragrance allergy.
Heisterberg MV; Andersen KE; Avnstorp C; Kristensen B; Kristensen O; Kaaber K; Laurberg G; Menné T; Nielsen NH; Sommerlund M; Thormann J; Veien NK; Vissing S; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Nov; 63(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 20946455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral®) as allergen: experience from a contact dermatitis unit.
Carvalho R; Maio P; Amaro C; Santos R; Cardoso J
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Sep; 30(3):249-50. PubMed ID: 21345163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Contact allergy to fragrances].
Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B; Swierczyńska-Machura D
Med Pr; 2006; 57(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 17340985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Baseline series fragrance markers fail to predict contact allergy.
Mann J; McFadden JP; White JM; White IR; Banerjee P
Contact Dermatitis; 2014 May; 70(5):276-81. PubMed ID: 24731084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patch testing with the European baseline series fragrance markers: a 2016 update.
Ung CY; White JML; White IR; Banerjee P; McFadden JP
Br J Dermatol; 2018 Mar; 178(3):776-780. PubMed ID: 28960261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Non-mix fragrances are top sensitizers in consecutive dermatitis patients - a cross-sectional study of the 26 EU-labelled fragrance allergens.
Bennike NH; Zachariae C; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Nov; 77(5):270-279. PubMed ID: 28511284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patch testing with hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (HICC) - a multicentre study of the Swedish Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Engfeldt M; Hagvall L; Isaksson M; Matura M; Mowitz M; Ryberg K; Stenberg B; Svedman C; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Jan; 76(1):34-39. PubMed ID: 27767215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contact Allergy to Fragrance Mix II and Hydroxyisohexyl 3-Cyclohexene Carboxaldehyde: A Retrospective Study by International Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Bruze M; Ale I; Andersen KE; Cannavó A; Diepgen T; Elsner P; Goh CL; Gonçalo M; Goossens A; McFadden J; Nixon R; Puangpet P; Sasseville D;
Dermatitis; 2020; 31(4):268-271. PubMed ID: 32265353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix - reactivity to the individual constituents and chemical detection in relevant cosmetic products.
Frosch PJ; Rastogi SC; Pirker C; Brinkmeier T; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Johansen JD; Menne T
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):216-25. PubMed ID: 15859994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patch test results with fragrance markers of the baseline series - analysis of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) network 2009-2012.
Frosch PJ; Duus Johansen J; Schuttelaar ML; Silvestre JF; Sánchez-Pérez J; Weisshaar E; Uter W;
Contact Dermatitis; 2015 Sep; 73(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 26080686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]