These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20573227)

  • 1. Assessment of mitral bioprostheses using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Rudolph A; Wassmuth R; Schulz-Menger J
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2010 Jun; 12(1):36. PubMed ID: 20573227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance to assess the orifice area of aortic bioprostheses.
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Rudolph A; Wassmuth R; Bohl S; Buschmann EE; Abdel-Aty H; Dietz R; Schulz-Menger J
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Sep; 2(5):397-404, 2 p following 404. PubMed ID: 19808628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro assessment of heart valve bioprostheses by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: four-dimensional mapping of flow patterns and orifice area planimetry.
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Dieringer MA; Greiser A; Schulz-Menger J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Sep; 40(3):736-42. PubMed ID: 21342775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aortic dilatation in patients with prosthetic aortic valve: comparison of MRI and echocardiography.
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Rudolph A; Wassmuth R; Abdel-Aty H; Schulz-Menger J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 May; 19(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 20583398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Routine cine-CMR for prosthesis-associated mitral regurgitation: a multicenter comparison to echocardiography.
    Simprini LA; Afroz A; Cooper MA; Klem I; Jensen C; Kim RJ; Srichai MB; Heitner JF; Sood M; Chandy E; Shah DJ; Lopez-Mattei J; Biederman RW; Grizzard JD; Fuisz A; Ghafourian K; Farzaneh-Far A; Weinsaft J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Sep; 23(5):575-82. PubMed ID: 25799706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantification of stenotic mitral valve area and diagnostic accuracy of mitral stenosis by dual-source computed tomography in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison with cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic echocardiography.
    Kim SS; Ko SM; Song MG; Chee HK; Kim JS; Hwang HK; Lee JH
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():103-14. PubMed ID: 25011534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of normal mitral Medtronic Hancock II, Medtronic Mosaic, and Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprostheses early after implantation.
    Blauwet LA; Malouf JF; Connolly HM; Hodge DO; Evans KN; Herges RM; Sundt TM; Miller FA
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2010 Jun; 23(6):656-66. PubMed ID: 20497863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization of Effective Orifice Areas of Mitral Prosthetic Heart Valves: An In-Vitro Study.
    Evin M; Magne J; Grieve SM; Rieu R; Pibarot P
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 Nov; 26(6):677-687. PubMed ID: 30207118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional assessment of bioprosthetic mitral valves by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: An in vitro validation and comparison to Doppler echocardiography.
    Maragiannis D; Jackson MS; Autry K; Flores Arredondo JH; Aggeli C; Tousoulis D; Zoghbi WA; Shah DJ; Little SH
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 Jul; 22(1):55. PubMed ID: 32727590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for the estimation of effective orifice area in aortic stenosis.
    Garcia J; Kadem L; Larose E; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2011 Apr; 13(1):25. PubMed ID: 21527021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated 4D flow cardiac MRI pipeline to derive peak mitral inflow diastolic velocities using short-axis cine stack: two centre validation study against echocardiographic pulse-wave doppler.
    Assadi H; Li R; Grafton-Clarke C; Uthayachandran B; Alabed S; Maiter A; Archer G; Swoboda PP; Sawh C; Ryding A; Nelthorpe F; Kasmai B; Ricci F; van der Geest RJ; Flather M; Vassiliou VS; Swift AJ; Garg P
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2023 Jan; 23(1):24. PubMed ID: 36647000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Normal echocardiographic characteristics of the Sorin Bicarbon bileaflet prosthetic heart valve in the mitral and aortic positions.
    Badano L; Mocchegiani R; Bertoli D; DeGaetano G; Carratino L; Pasetti L; Caudullo M; Budini A; Mannello B; Passerone G
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 1997; 10(6):632-43. PubMed ID: 9282353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative assessment of primary mitral regurgitation using left ventricular volumes obtained with new automated three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic software: A comparison with 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Levy F; Marechaux S; Iacuzio L; Schouver ED; Castel AL; Toledano M; Rusek S; Dor V; Tribouilloy C; Dreyfus G
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2018; 111(8-9):507-517. PubMed ID: 29610031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position.
    Eichinger WB; Botzenhardt F; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Keithahn A; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):382-8; discussion 388-9. PubMed ID: 15222284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
    Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional Assessment of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves by CMR.
    Maragiannis D; Jackson MS; Flores-Arredondo JH; Autry K; Schutt RC; Alvarez PA; Zoghbi WA; Shah DJ; Little SH
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 9(7):785-793. PubMed ID: 27184505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Absolute assessment of aortic valve stenosis by planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and cardiac catheterisation.
    Reant P; Lederlin M; Lafitte S; Serri K; Montaudon M; Corneloup O; Roudaut R; Laurent F
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Aug; 59(2):276-83. PubMed ID: 16873006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for direct assessment of anatomic regurgitant orifice in mitral regurgitation.
    Buchner S; Debl K; Poschenrieder F; Feuerbach S; Riegger GA; Luchner A; Djavidani B
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Sep; 1(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 19808532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemodynamic differentiation of pathologic and physiologic stenosis in mitral porcine bioprostheses.
    Czer LS; Gray RJ; Bateman TM; DeRobertis MA; Resser K; Chaux A; Matloff JM
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1986 Feb; 7(2):284-94. PubMed ID: 3944346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated quantification of mitral inflow and aortic outflow stroke volumes by three-dimensional real-time volume color-flow Doppler transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with pulsed-wave Doppler and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
    Thavendiranathan P; Liu S; Datta S; Walls M; Nitinunu A; Van Houten T; Tomson NA; Vidmar L; Georgescu B; Wang Y; Srinivasan S; De Michelis N; Raman SV; Ryan T; Vannan MA
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2012 Jan; 25(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 22105057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.